RE : Re: Re: Legalitis infects St. 's Medical Center

[Guest guest]

Really???

Could you find that reference for us and give us the location, law, etc?

Thank you!

On 7/31/07, ginloi <ginloi@...> wrote:

>

> The only hysteria is on the other side. Homeland Security and the

> Transportation Safety Administration clearly articulates at the end of their

> legislation information about biohazards and microbials, but disclaims by

> using the language " not naturally occuring " or similar language.

>

> They KNOW - that is why the chase is on. The harder they are fighting

> means the other side is winning.

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

One of the reasons that a lawyer might not be able to take a suit is because of

lack of NEXUS

which is the causal proof that is required. If you have no biopsy and just

reading that Univ. of Fl is going to work with a couple of hospitals Brigham and

Womens alongside others, mentioned a possible urine test which would be

fabulous, and non invasive. Then you need to have the exposing mold match

exactly what they found in your body. It is truly a tough task. Finding the

right doc who knows what they are doing and beating back the other powers that

be make it really hard. Then you get into the whole victim-blaming game... Not

enough lawyers really have their arms around the problem. To get to first base,

you have to have the NEXUS. And, an expert witness who is qualified in that

state to speak to the exposure. That expert has to blow holes in the defense,

usually the insurance people, who have deep pockets and whose job it is to

minimize their exposure. They have people and lawyers who work for them

full-time for defense work. The plaintiff has to bankroll

the expenses and even if it is done on a contingency fee basis, where if the

case prevails, the lawyer gets a percentage of the proceeds, and that would be

after the appeal period. The Civil Action movie is the perfect example of the

risk involved for the lawyer. We have all been out there on the limb. Unless

the lawyer is really informed in this area, he or she climbs out there, subject

to the prospect that the limb will be sawed off by the defense. Unless the firm

or the individual attorney can take the risk because their work volume and

income is great, finding good counsel for any case will be tough. Their is no

safety net for them, either. It can be very discouraging for both sides, even

if the lawyer would really love to take a mold case, financial risk can be too

great.

LiveSimply <quackadillian@...> a écrit :

I was told by someone who is in a position to know that the in CA at

least,

the high cost of bringing in expert witnesses means that ALL RENTERS MOLD

LAWSUITS NOMATTER HOW NASTY THE SITUATION