Re: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Goes ''Green''

[Guest guest]

I'm happy that they have an awesome building but I believe that if

they REALLY believed in stewardship for their patients' health they

would COVER all of us who have become disabled by SICK BUILDINGS!We

need their policies to include our doctors, their assessment

protocols, tests, labs,and ongoing treatments for our chronic

compromises.We too deserve appropriate medical care from environmental

specialists who know protocols that actually can improve our

compromised health.Personally I think their priorities are a bit off!

We deserve to get treatment from any doctor we choose who knows about

environmental contaminants FIRST. They can brag about their GREEN

buildings after they take care of their patients.

[Guest guest]

Couldn't agree MORE!! I was denied a Rx from my Dr.because they didn't

agree. Who is my ins. to disagree with the physician who knows what is best for

me. After 3 months of phone calls, the Drs./office time, forms and letters I was

finally able to get it!! Shouldn't have to be that way!

Sue

[Guest guest]

I have Ble Cross and they argued with the doctors office to give me sporanox

Janet

**************************************

Get a sneak peek of the all-new

AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour

[Guest guest]

I think that our way of paying for healthcare is almost designed to keep people

sick..

Its certainly preventing the real causes of a lot of diseases from becoming

known.. instead they treat the symptoms at best and often dont even do that-

as all of us know..

Its a delaying tactic.. they want to delay indefinitely the process of

discovery of what in our current environment is unhealthy..

Perhaps because those factors effect poor people didproportionately much? I

don't know..

Think about it.. if we had universal healthcare, suddenly it would be in

(almost) everybodys best interests to get to the REAL causes of these

illnesses..

That is, except for the people responsible for them...

Can using these chemicals really make everything that much more profitable

that it is worth ruining so many lives for that money?

[Guest guest]

Next time they argue with you about the treatment protocol your doctor

requires, how about showing your card? Go to his website

and copy the card on your printer if you think it might help. It has

helped others. How about asking the executive offices if their CEO has

even been in a documentary film before, and perhaps he/she would give

an interview when the camera comes to his office.

[Guest guest]

You Got That right.

Elvira

LiveSimply <quackadillian@...> wrote:

I think that our way of paying for healthcare is almost designed to

keep people sick..

Its certainly preventing the real causes of a lot of diseases from becoming

known.. instead they treat the symptoms at best and often dont even do that-

as all of us know..

Its a delaying tactic.. they want to delay indefinitely the process of

discovery of what in our current environment is unhealthy..

Perhaps because those factors effect poor people didproportionately much? I

don't know..

Think about it.. if we had universal healthcare, suddenly it would be in

(almost) everybodys best interests to get to the REAL causes of these

illnesses..

That is, except for the people responsible for them...

Can using these chemicals really make everything that much more profitable

that it is worth ruining so many lives for that money?