Guest guest Posted July 16, 2007 Report Share Posted July 16, 2007 Breaking the Mold Dealing With Dangers From the Fungus Among Us LA Downtown News Online - Los Angeles,CA* by Ed Ritchie http://www.ladowntownnews.com/thebodyshop/ It's in the air we breathe, the food we eat and on most everything we touch. It can turn milk to cheese or destroy an entire silo of grain. And like asbestos and lead-based paint in the past, it's the current focus of media hype, multi-million dollar litigation and widespread health fears. The culprit is mold, an essential part of the world's ecosystem. The tough fungus, which is represented by more than 100,000 varieties, travels as an airborne spore until it finds a moist, organic surface. Then it develops into its unpleasant counterpart ‹ a dark, wet-looking substance that often smells as bad as it looks. But is it really a health hazard? Apart from recent high-profile lawsuits blaming mold for everything from asthma to nerve paralysis (Ed McMahon was involved in a case of mold litigation), unless you have a weakened immune system, the odds are you don't have much to fear. But like mushrooms, some varieties are toxic, and public health agencies say mold of any kind shouldn't be allowed to proliferate. The National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH) notes that symptoms of mold exposure include hay-fever like allergies (dust or reactions to animal hair could also be a cause), and warns that young children and the elderly may be at increased risk for infection. The most common indoor molds are cladosporium, penicillium, aspergillus and alternaria. Stachybotrys chartarum, a toxic mold found in buildings, has been the subject of many lawsuits. It likes material with a high cellulose and low nitrogen content, which describes the composition of typical building materials such as fiberboard and gypsum board, and common household items like paper, dust and lint. According to the NCEH, " At present there is no test that proves an association between Stachybotrys chartarum (Stachybotrys atra) and particular health symptoms. However, if Stachybotrys chartarum or other molds are found in a building, prudent practice recommends that they be removed. " Suits and Lawyers There's no consensus within the scientific or medical communities about the health hazards of mold, but that hasn't stopped the flood of expensive legal battles taking place across the country. On one side are the insurance companies, building owners and construction and real estate industries, all potentially liable for the causes of mold or its hazards to health and property. On the other side are public and private employees, residential and commercial property occupants and trial lawyers. " Some molds are toxic, " says Loren Witkin, a principal with Glendale- based Citadel Environmental Services. " But I don't think there's ever a reason to hit the panic button and run screaming out of the building. " Yet the multi-million dollar lawsuits and media hoopla have spawned an army of mold lawyers and fungus finders who nearly encourage the public to panic ‹ and sue. Some observers say the litigation costs are devastating the construction industry, commercial and residential property owners, and the insurance companies that service these groups. " Many attorneys are dedicating a significant amount of their practice to these cases, " says Shafery, a partner at the law firm of Poole and Shafery. Shafery represents defendants in mold related suits and explains that such cases often become nightmares for anyone even remotely associated with the construction of a building. In one case, 400 condominium owners sued more than 100 parties involved with the building's construction. The suits are expensive. A recent case involved a California homeowner who was awarded $18.5 million, with all but $500,000 of it for punitive damages. Insurance companies are scrambling to control their losses. State Farm, one of the country's largest, has stopped writing new homeowners insurance coverage in California and 29 other states. The fear of mold-based litigation has forced many insurers to stop covering builders and their subcontractors, says Nichole Mahrt, spokesperson for the American Insurance Association. " Home construction and sales have been the shining lights in California's economy and if they can't get insurance, they're not going to build housing, " she warns. Insurance companies are also fighting existing claims, citing the fact that it's a general practice in the industry to exclude mold from damage coverage. " Policies don't include mold, " explains Mahrt, " yet the typical water damage claim forces us to protect ourselves from bad faith claims so we have to pay for additional steps. A toilet overflow that used to cost $3,000 now costs $30,000. " Safety Steps Despite the lack of legislated standards, it's possible for both building owners and occupants to develop a reasonably mold-safe environment, say experts at Citadel Environmental Services. Commercial building owners should have their buildings inspected for water damage and mold by a qualified company. Once an inspection is done and any remediation completed, management should have a proactive plan, including a written policy instructing maintenance staff how to respond to water leaks or mold growth, a program manager and training for field staff. " Most buildings don't have their systems cleaned as often as they should, which is every three to six years, " Witkin says. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.