Where is the military research?

[Guest guest]

The military has been studying the effects of toxic mold for decades.

Where is this research? Why isn't it being used by plaintiffs during

lawsuits?

[Guest guest]

There is a long " chapter 34 " most of us have read on trichothecene

mycotoxins in a military handbook on biological warfare that gives the

toxicity for inhaled T-2 toxin versus ingested vs dermal absorbtion that

conflicts clearly with the missatements of the troubled ACOEM and AAAAI

'position papers' - the thing that stands out is that the inhlation toxicity

is much higher than ingested - but they never mentioned that in the papers,

although it seems like its a very important fact that they really needed

to...

there is also a lot of research that shows that lipopolysaccharide

endotoxins potentiate the toxic effects of trichothecenes.. that seems as if

it would be important to mention too.. but surprise, they left it out...

wonder why?

[Guest guest]

The military did do some good research that is online that I've seen,

and it was honest about how dangerous they are.

I also read somewhere that the Chnese had studied the trichothecenes

(when the Russians were using them in some conflict in Asia somewhere,

maybe Afghanistan?) and that they thought they were extremely

dangerous..

[Guest guest]

I have read Chapter 34. If the military has been studying these biological

toxins for decades and likely have volumes of research material, then why isn't

that enough proof?

LiveSimply <quackadillian@...> wrote: The military did do some

good research that is online that I've seen,

and it was honest about how dangerous they are.

I also read somewhere that the Chnese had studied the trichothecenes

(when the Russians were using them in some conflict in Asia somewhere,

maybe Afghanistan?) and that they thought they were extremely

dangerous..

---------------------------------

Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles.

Visit the Auto Green Center.

[Guest guest]

I think it's because theirs is related to warfare and not indoor

exposures and someone somewhere once claimed that mold indoors

couldn't make you sick. one guess where that came from.

The military did do

some good research that is online that I've seen,

> and it was honest about how dangerous they are.

>

> I also read somewhere that the Chnese had studied the trichothecenes

> (when the Russians were using them in some conflict in Asia

somewhere,

> maybe Afghanistan?) and that they thought they were extremely

> dangerous..

>

>

>

>

>

> ---------------------------------

> Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative

vehicles.

> Visit the Auto Green Center.

>

>

[Guest guest]

There IS enough proof out there, and has been for a while, but the ACOEM and

AAAAI represent corporate naysayers (and often disregard the opinions of

their own members) and they are very influential and they are involved in a

dinsinformation campaign - WITH SOME US GOVERNMENT FUNDING !!!! apparently -

that has so far been able to OBSCURE the issue in a multitude of lies.