Guest guest Posted August 16, 2007 Report Share Posted August 16, 2007 In a message dated 8/16/2007 8:14:28 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, charlesb35@... writes: Do you remember anything else about the other article? I have some older articles that I could look through if you have any other details. The one article that was actually authored by Renata Zilch is helpful. But somewhere, I remember reading Renata is a high level risk manager. BTW, Renata Zilch is a fictitious name. And I a pretty sure it is a man, not a woman. I think I may even know which man. Soon to find out if I am right or not! If you come across anything with " Renata Zilch risk manager " that would be great. Thanks for your help, Sharon ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2007 Report Share Posted August 16, 2007 I found these 5 items. http://www.skepticreport.com/skepticism/dauberttest.htm http://www.skepticreport.com/general/m-skepticism.htm http://www.skepticreport.com/mythsmysteries/mold.htm http://www.skepticreport.com/crossref/cr-zi.htm http://www.skepticreport.com/pseudoscience/psitechsmart.htm > > Hey, > > I am looking for an old document with the name " Renata Zilch " on it. I > can't find it in my files. I have the one from the Skeptics Report where Steve > Loomis cites this person regarding Daubert and the Ballard case, but there is > another document that says this person is a high level risk manager over the > mold issue. Does anyone remember seeing this doc? > > Thanks, > Sharon K > > > > ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all- new AOL at > http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2007 Report Share Posted August 16, 2007 Do you remember anything else about the other article? I have some older articles that I could look through if you have any other details. > > Hey, > > I am looking for an old document with the name " Renata Zilch " on it. I > can't find it in my files. I have the one from the Skeptics Report where Steve > Loomis cites this person regarding Daubert and the Ballard case, but there is > another document that says this person is a high level risk manager over the > mold issue. Does anyone remember seeing this doc? > > Thanks, > Sharon K > > > > ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all- new AOL at > http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2007 Report Share Posted August 16, 2007 I remember reading, would it be in t-law archives? when, maybe a year ago?maybe longer, thinking both were posted, but dont remember topic. > > Hey, > > I am looking for an old document with the name " Renata Zilch " on it. I > can't find it in my files. I have the one from the Skeptics Report where Steve > Loomis cites this person regarding Daubert and the Ballard case, but there is > another document that says this person is a high level risk manager over the > mold issue. Does anyone remember seeing this doc? > > Thanks, > Sharon K > > > > ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all- new AOL at > http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 16, 2007 Report Share Posted September 16, 2007 So he is saying that the entire body of research that shows illness from all IAQ problems is a complete fabrication!!!!? " Sureness " that one is " always " right brings up danger flags for me.. also.. Nobody is always right.. nobody.. ever.. Grown ups admit them.. On 9/16/07, snk1955@... <snk1955@...> wrote: > > > PS. Love the concluding sentence on this one. > " As long as people need something to blame for their health problems, > juries > are sympathetic to visions of people's homes making them ill and insurance > > companies have money, this will continue. So there will be jobs for mold > experts, mold removal companies, and mold attorneys- and me for a long > time to > come. " > > ************************************** See what's new at > http://www.aol.com > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2007 Report Share Posted September 17, 2007 In a message dated 9/17/2007 6:22:11 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, quackadillian@... writes: So he is saying that the entire body of research that shows illness from all IAQ problems is a complete fabrication!IAQ " Sureness " that one is " always " right brings up danger flags for me.. also.. Nobody is always right.. nobody.. ever.. Grown ups admit them.. This has nothing to do with being right or wrong. It's all about the money. It was policy decision to put the interests of industry over the safety of the American public. They are working diligently to get the buildings cleaned up. They anticipate about a 20 year cycle before the materials and construction methods currently used, and being replaced, have been mostly depleted from the building stock. From the 2005, Surgeon General's Workshop: " Although the committee found no association of dampness to a wide range of other symptoms or conditions, given existing evidence, the committee found ample scientific justification to conclude that dampness is a public health problem. It therefore makes sense to adopt a widespread approach to correcting the condition rather than to take a clinical approach to treating the symptoms. " In other words, you are not important. Money is. Sharon Sharon ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.