Re: accuracy of 9/11 health reports is questioned

[Guest guest]

The way I read this is " they are damned if they do and damned if they don't "

So, doctors who have watched many people get sick in really horrible ways

that destroyed their lives are supposed to not feel any emotion or draw any

general conclusions about the situation?

That is sort of what they seem to me to be saying.

> " They are doing the workers a disservice, " he said, " because any time you

veer from objective and confirmable statements, you're destroying your own

case. "

> " They are people with a cause, " Dr. said.

Also, - since its clear that they needed them, why didn't they get adequate

resources given to them to address these perceived issues?

It sounds an awful lot ot me like the situation with mold illness and not

being able to get tests. One has to wonder if its intentional.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/07/nyregion/07sinai.html<http://www.nytimes.com/2\

007/09/07/nyregion/07sinai.html?>