Guest guest Posted September 29, 2007 Report Share Posted September 29, 2007 > That means the mold entombed in the hospital's walls was killed, Murray said. They said that there were no patient complaints about mold so WHO WERE THE COMPLAINTS COMING FROM? The tradeoff when they use things like chlorine dioxide to 'kill' mold is that once the mold is dead and cell walls are disrupted some of these chemicals may act to liberate from and *accelerate* the release of toxins from them. It probably doesn't effect the allergenicity from mold either. And the mold would probably still cause allergic sensitization to it. Straus, , et al, showed that chlorine dioxide doesn't destroy mycotoxins at all, so it wouldn't probably make the mold in the walls any safer in those respects either, (although the gas would have killed most or maybe even all existing *viable spores* that would cause mycotic colonization of immunosuppressed patients, one of the big worries in hospitals.) New mold would not grow unless there was new moisture, condensation, leaks, etc. Did they change whatever conditions caused it to grow originally? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 29, 2007 Report Share Posted September 29, 2007 I finished the article pretty terrified - there was a reference in it to the water leaks remaining un-repaired and someone saying, essentially, nevermind the water, we've killed the mold. But of course if you still got wet, where ever that mold came from last time it will come from again... ~Haley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2007 Report Share Posted September 30, 2007 > Workers on scaffolding covered by huge plastic sheets continue to apply a waterproof coating to four stories of the hospital's exterior. They're sealing windows and replacing showers. The work could continue through May. Old buildings like hospitals need to be maintained aggressively, which in the case of a hospital really should include regularly scheduled moisture control work on any problem areas and additional insulation and ventilation for any ares where condensation might be a problem. > Murray said the costs of repairs and replacements is miniscule compared with savings realized by fumigating the hospital instead of fighting the mold in a piecemeal approach that would have taken several years. I don't know how much money they spent on the Giuliani company, but if it was a lot, it seems like that money would probably have been better spent on more maintenance and put towards a 'new building fund'. That money would probably mostly go to overtime for existing unionized employees, and things like new paint and building materials, and it isn't glamorous and new and flashy. Helping unionized workers feed their families wouldn't earn them political brownie points either, like it would have in the past. I wonder what will happen to employees there who complain about mold now? If large mats of hidden stachybotrys mold were killed, I think that could cause issues in the future which could effect health care there quite a bit, but that would not show up in spore testing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.