Guest guest Posted September 27, 2007 Report Share Posted September 27, 2007 KC, Yes, I totally agree. People should also inform themselves about the history of places like the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.. (i.e. the Human Genome Project, etc.) so they can see the situation in historical perspective. Genetic pseudoscience theories that were later proven to be completely wrong under the name of eugenics have also been used to justify some of the worst atrocities in human history. Rationalization is very powerful. http://www.eugenicsarchive.org/ http://www.waragainsttheweak.com/ On 9/27/07, tigerpaw2c <tigerpaw2c@...> wrote: > > I read the pdf and I agree with everything that was mentioned except > for one thing. In my opinion I do not believe that MCS is a genetic > predisposition. I do believe everyone has a suceptability one way or > the other and of course at different severities. If you are being > exposed to whatever chemical sooner or later you will have a reaction, > mild or severe and become sensitized. It just goes to show that > everyone is different and your immune system will react accordingly. > For this reason I will not sign the petition. I also believe that this > favors the chemical industry that only some will react with this > disposition (MCS) and furthr allow them to continue using some of > their chemicals, since it doesn't affect all, supposedly. > > KC > > _ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2007 Report Share Posted September 28, 2007 I haven't read it yet. I guess it is like smoking everyone doesn't get lung cancer, and people get it at differnt ages some earlier than others. Some get lung cancer from second hand smoke, we are all different. > > KC, > > Yes, I totally agree. > > People should also inform themselves > about the history of places like the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.. > (i.e. the Human Genome Project, etc.) so they can see the situation in > historical perspective. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2007 Report Share Posted September 28, 2007 If it's the one I think, I never read it either, couldn't get nothing to work on the site, may of been my puter at the time. I don't believe any genitic predisposition plays a role either. this is the only thing that bothered me about s interview, she daid allergies have nothing to do with it but than said there was believed to be a genitic disposition but didn't say what. I believe the info. I just posted regarding the cranial sensory system play the major role in mcs/mci, fobromyalgia,cfs,ect. basoca;;y its all from the brain damage and the cranial sensory system controls all other organs including the liver and kidneys. if a organ sends a message to the brain and it's malfunctioning it cant be good. theres a reason why I didn't get mcs/mci in my first home. or should I say full blown mci as I'm sure these organ were affected but my liver and brain was still communacating to detox it. but it took the high amounts at the second home to push these organs pver the edge.and with the second home haveing high moisture, bacteria may have played a big roll. so yes I do believe thers a difference based on level of damage. I dont know how many read the article I posted from tox.sci on mci and ethanal but according to tox.sci the new term is multiple chemical intolerance and haveing a bad intolerance to alcohol is a pretty good clue of haveing mci. and after my exposure in this second home, one or two sop's of any alcoholic beverage had very bad effects on me, anywhere from terriable dierrhia with blood to throwing my guts up and haveing some kind of asthma type attack at the same time (thought I was going to die)to hallusinations and verly being able to stand. the last time I let someone talk me into trying a drink with a couple of sips I went from verily makeing it to the car to not knowing where I was in my own town and grabbing the stearring whell because I thought he was in the lane of oncoming traffic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2007 Report Share Posted September 28, 2007 I have to agree on this one, I would not sign this either. I never became chemically sensitive until recently with some products, odors of other kinds, and this is being very ill from molds for 19 months. I have not been genetically predispositioned to molds and certainly not for starting to experience MCS. Everyone is unique in their own body's system's, we are not going to react the same, or experience the same symptoms as another, we might come close. My take, is that if I was predispositioned genetically, wouldn't my family members be. After all, we are talking about genetic's here. So therefore I would not sign this petition, and would not recommend anyone else to either. Darlene > > I read the pdf and I agree with everything that was mentioned except > for one thing. In my opinion I do not believe that MCS is a genetic > predisposition. I do believe everyone has a suceptability one way or > the other and of course at different severities. If you are being > exposed to whatever chemical sooner or later you will have a reaction, > mild or severe and become sensitized. It just goes to show that > everyone is different and your immune system will react accordingly. > For this reason I will not sign the petition. I also believe that this > favors the chemical industry that only some will react with this > disposition (MCS) and furthr allow them to continue using some of > their chemicals, since it doesn't affect all, supposedly. > > KC > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.