Guest guest Posted October 4, 2007 Report Share Posted October 4, 2007 Congress probes how labs handle lethal germs Incidents at labs run by CDC, others raise concern Atlanta Journal Constitution - GA* By LARRY MARGASAK Associated Press Published on: 10/03/07 http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/stories/2007/10/03/labgerms_1003 ..html Washington — American laboratories handling the world's deadliest germs and toxins have experienced more than 100 accidents and missing shipments since 2003, and the number is increasing as more labs do the work. The House Energy and Commerce investigations subcommittee plans hearings Thursday on the issue. The lab incidents have sparked bipartisan concern. • More Nation/World news • More Science news " It may be only a matter of time before our nation has a public health incident with potentially catastrophic results, " said Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), the panel's chairman. No one died, and regulators said the public was never at risk during the incidents. But the cases reflect poorly on procedures and oversight at high-security labs, some of which work with organisms and poisons that can cause illnesses with no cure. In some cases, labs have failed to report accidents as required by law. The mishaps include workers bitten or scratched by infected animals, skin cuts, needle sticks and more, according to a review of confidential reports to federal regulators. The accidents involved anthrax, bird flu virus, monkeypox and plague-causing bacteria at 44 labs in 24 states. The number of accidents has risen steadily. Through August, labs reported 36 accidents and lost shipments during 2007 — nearly double the number reported during all of 2004. Likewise, the number of labs approved to handle the deadliest substances has nearly doubled to 409 since 2004, and there are now 15 of the highest-security labs. Federal regulators inspect labs just once every three years, but accidents trigger interim inspections. In a new report, congressional investigators said little is known about labs that aren't federally funded or don't work with dangerous substances the government monitors most closely. Responsibility spread " No single federal agency ... has the mission to track the overall number of these labs in the United States, " said the Government Accountability Office report, expected to be released this week. " Consequently, no agency is responsible for determining the risks associated with the proliferation of these labs. " Thursday's congressional hearing on the labs comes in the wake of an hour-long power outage this summer at CDC's new infectious disease lab in Atlanta and as the University of Georgia in Athens is one of five finalists for a major new federal animal disease lab called the National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility. A senior CDC official, Dr. Besser, said his agency is committed to ensuring that U.S. labs are safe and that all such incidents are disclosed to the government. He said he was unaware of any risk to the public resulting from infections among workers at the high-security labs, but he acknowledged that regulators are worried about unreported accidents. " If you're asking if it's possible for someone to not report an infection, and have it missed, that clearly is a concern that we have, " Besser said. Lab accidents have affected the outside world: Britain's health and safety agency concluded there was a " strong probability " a leaking pipe at a British lab making vaccines for foot-and-mouth disease was the source of an outbreak in livestock this year. Britain suspended exports of livestock, meat and milk products and destroyed livestock. The disease does not infect humans. Accidents aren't the only concern. While medical experts consider it unlikely that a lab employee will become sick and infect others, these labs have strict rules to prevent theft of organisms or toxins. Among the previously undisclosed accidents: • In Decatur, a worker at the Georgia Public Health Laboratory handled a Brucella culture in April 2004 without high-level precautions. She became feverish months later and tested positive for exposure at a hospital emergency room in July. She eventually returned to work. The lab's confidential report defended her: " The technologist is a good laboratorian and has good technique. " • In Rockville, Md., ferret No. 992, inoculated with bird flu virus, bit a technician at Bioqual Inc. on the right thumb in July. The worker was quarantined for five days and directed to wear a mask to protect others. • An Oklahoma State University lab in December could not account for a dead mouse inoculated with bacteria that causes joint pain, weakness, lymph node swelling and pneumonia. The lab said an employee " must have forgotten to remove the dead mouse from the cage " before the cage was sterilized. • In Albuquerque, N.M., an employee at the Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute was bitten by an infected monkey in September 2006. The animal was ill from an infection of bacteria that causes plague. " When the gloves were removed, the skin appeared to be broken in two or three places, " the report said. The worker was referred to a doctor, but nothing more was disclosed. • In Fort , Colo., a worker at a CDC facility found three broken vials of Russian spring-summer encephalitis virus in 2004. Wearing only a laboratory coat and gloves, he used tweezers to remove broken glass and moved the materials to a special container. The virus, a potential bio-warfare agent, could cause brain inflammation and is supposed to be handled in a lab requiring pressure suits that resemble spacesuits. The report did not say whether the worker became ill. Leaks, lost shipments Other reports describe leaks of contaminated waste, dropped containers with cultures of bacteria and viruses, and defective seals on airtight containers. Some recount missing or lost shipments, including plague bacteria that was supposed to be delivered to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in 2003. The wayward plague shipment was discovered eventually in Belgium and incinerated safely. The reports must be submitted to regulators whenever a lab suffers a theft, loss or release of any of 72 substances known as " select agents " — a government list of germs and toxins that represent the horror stories of the world's worst medical tragedies for humans and animals.. Rules for working in the labs are tough and are getting more restrictive as the bio-safety levels rise. The highest is Level 4, where labs study substances that pose a high risk of life- threatening disease for which no vaccine or therapy is available. Besides wearing full-body, air-supplied suits, workers undergo extensive background checks and carry special identification cards. " The risk that a killer agent could be set loose in the general population is real, " said Hammond, who runs the Sunshine Project, which has tracked incidents at other labs for years. Atlanta Journal-Constitution staff writer Alison Young contributed to this article. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 4, 2007 Report Share Posted October 4, 2007 Isn't one of those biowarfare labs right next door to " Old Lyme, Connecticut " ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.