Re: He calls medical board's charges 'totally bogus'

[Guest guest]

You know, I don't know as much about Dr. Rea as I would like to but its

obvious to me that the insurance company establishment as well as the

medical establishment feels threatened by him because of what they imply

about other treatments and society's use of chemicals generally.

And the fact that clearly, they work. (as many people here have attested to)

I have seen photos of Dr. Rea's suites and they clearly must have cost a

huge amount of money to build because they apper to be completely sterile.

They look like 1950s diners or operating rooms in that everything is metal

or glass - cleanable. The air is highly filtered.

I gather that the goal is to provide a temporary stay in a controlled

environment where the body can get a jump start on the healing process. Such

environments, if available, would be very useful for us, because they would

enable us to briefly, isolate ourselves completely away from mold, something

that isn't possible in most uncontrolled environments. (Of course, it is

possible to get out of bad mold environments, but wherever you go you do get

exposed to lots of other products of society, as well as low-level exposures

that may prolong mold illness)

I am surprised that they quoted this quackwatch character.. as I think he

and his company has been under scrutiny for questionable practices.

Why aren't treatments like this covered by insurance? They wouldn't be so

expensive if they were. (the economics of scale would bring down the price)