Guest guest Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 THIS IS GREAT,IT SHOULD BE ON TV,PLAYED OVER AND OVER AGAIN, PEOPLE NEED TO GET PISSED AND DO SOMETHING. MAYBE ALL KIDS EVERYWHERE SHOULD JUST REFUSE TO GO TO MOLD INFESTED SCHOOLS AND THEIR PARENTS SHOULD STAND BEHIND THEM. WE ALL KNOW THIS PROBLEM IS NOT GOING TO JUST GO AWAY BY ITSELF. I PERSONALLY FELL THAT THE MEMBERS OF THE ACOEM AND AAAAI THAT HINDERED THE PROCESS OF TOXIC MOLDS BEING RECONIZED AND CAUSED SO MANY TO SUFFER SHOULD BE LINED UP AND SHOT. IT IS A DISGRACE TO OUR COUNTRY THAT THIS HAS BEEN ALLOWED TO HAPPEN. IT'S NOTHING SHORT OF A TERROIST ATTACK ON OUR ON PEOPLE BY OUR OWN PEOPLE. WHY ARE WE SPENDING MILLIONS ON ANOTHER COUNTRY WHILE OUR OWN KIDS ARE SUFFERING? IT'S DISCUSTING! --- In , " tigerpaw2c " <tigerpaw2c@...> wrote: > > Westview High School > > WHS Mold Documentary - by a student > Please take the time to watch, in its entirety. > This is and has always been about THEM! > Thanks! > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 I don't think kids refusing to go to mold infested schools would work because the 'lower taxes' advocates would just LOVE that. They hate the idea of public schooling and they are trying to destroy the public education system and mold is one of the ways they hope to do it. No, those kids should wear N100 masks and other PPE while they go to school and their parents should fight for healthy schools by informing the news media what is going on and WHY. On Nov 30, 2007 12:16 PM, who <jeaninem660@...> wrote: > > THIS IS GREAT,IT SHOULD BE ON TV,PLAYED OVER AND OVER AGAIN, > PEOPLE NEED TO GET PISSED AND DO SOMETHING. MAYBE ALL KIDS EVERYWHERE > SHOULD JUST REFUSE TO GO TO MOLD INFESTED SCHOOLS AND THEIR PARENTS > SHOULD STAND BEHIND THEM. WE ALL KNOW THIS PROBLEM IS NOT GOING TO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 what surprised me was that there were less than 100 protestors. i don't know the full story, but if half the student body + their parents were to get involved, then just maybe the mold problem would be remediated...or if the high schoolers were to transfer to another school, that may get the schoolboard's attention. > > > > Westview High School > > > > WHS Mold Documentary - by a student > > Please take the time to watch, in its entirety. > > This is and has always been about THEM! > > Thanks! > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2007 Report Share Posted December 1, 2007 , it's called apathy. Unless something affects those people personally, they'd rather not bother helping the victims. Barth --- x> what surprised me was that there were less than 100 protestors. i x> don't know the full story, but if half the student body + their x> parents were to get involved, then just maybe the mold problem would x> be remediated...or if the high schoolers were to transfer to another x> school, that may get the schoolboard's attention. x> x> >> > >> > Westview High School >> > >> > WHS Mold Documentary - by a student >> > Please take the time to watch, in its entirety. >> > This is and has always been about THEM! >> > Thanks! >> > >> > >> > >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2007 Report Share Posted December 1, 2007 This is the most ludricous arguement I have read yet. I am personally opposed to higher property taxes, but I am not in favor of the chronic illness that mold/bacterial exposure causes when water intrudes into buildings. The children, even if wearing masks as suggested by LS, stand a high risk of becoming permanently injured. The injuries will last a life time and may cause death and an early age. Besides, look at property taxes today. They are sufficient to build safe schools. The politicians, school authorities, architects and constractors are the ones who actually refuse to build safe schools. For example, I am involved in a case near Corpus Christi, Texas where improper sealing of pipes, window, and celing wall plates junctures occurred. When the new 10 million dollar building was open, water came into the building along with mold and bacteria. It took another 10 million to repair and some of the occupants are still ill. Many of the affected children graduated but the staff remained behind. Also, some of the new repairs were not done correctly. There are many more schools throughout the country in the same condition. My recommendation is to replace those who are responsible with individuals are are concerned with the health and welfare of our children. We do not have to raise or lower taxes in order to build safer schools. Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D. Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist www.drthrasher.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2007 Report Share Posted December 1, 2007 The government wont help. I got sick in a governmentrt building and they did everything they could to deny me workmens comp and they won. Janet ************************************** Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest products. (http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2007 Report Share Posted December 1, 2007 Well said Dr. Thrasher. --------------------------------- Never miss a thing. Make your homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2007 Report Share Posted December 1, 2007 tHIS IS HOW i SEE IT. A NATURAL HAZARD IS- ANYTHING CAUSED BY NATURE THAT HARMS YOUR HEALTH. READ THAT IN A INSURANCE PAMPLET. WHAT IS TOXICMOLD? IT'S A NATURAL HAZARD A NATURAL DISASTER SHOULD INCLUDE SCHOOLS RIDDLED WITH TOXICMOLDS. TO ME MY OWN TOXICMOLD HOMES WERE ALSO A NATURAL DISASTER BECAUSE EACH AND EVERYONE OF OUR LIVES SUPPOSED TO BE JUST AS IMPORTANT AS THE OTHER. WHERE ARE THE INSURANCE COMPANIES, WHERE IS FEMA, WHERE IS OUR GOVERMENT? I DONT THINK OUR GOVERMENT SHOULD BE SITTING ON THEIR ASSES WHILE A WAR IS GOING ON RIGHT HERE. THEY SHOULD BE HELPING US AND GOING AFTER THE INSURANCE COMPANIES WHO DENIE PAYMENTS FOR NATURAL HAZARDS THAT HARM OUR HEALTH. > > This is the most ludricous arguement I have read yet. I am personally opposed to higher property taxes, but I am not in favor of the chronic illness that mold/bacterial exposure causes when water intrudes into buildings. The children, even if wearing masks as suggested by LS, stand a high risk of becoming permanently injured. The injuries will last a life time and may cause death and an early age. Besides, look at property taxes today. They are sufficient to build safe schools. The politicians, school authorities, architects and constractors are the ones who actually refuse to build safe schools. For example, I am involved in a case near Corpus Christi, Texas where improper sealing of pipes, window, and celing wall plates junctures occurred. When the new 10 million dollar building was open, water came into the building along with mold and bacteria. It took another 10 million to repair and some of the occupants are still ill. Many of the affected children graduated but the staff remained behind. Also, some of the new repairs were not done correctly. There are many more schools throughout the country in the same condition. My recommendation is to replace those who are responsible with individuals are are concerned with the health and welfare of our children. We do not have to raise or lower taxes in order to build safer schools. > > Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D. > Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist > www.drthrasher.org > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2007 Report Share Posted December 1, 2007 Dr Thrasher, Texas legislation for years required that schools be built by the lowest bidder. Period. This created many substandard buildings especially in terms of water damage along with the subsequent mold and bacterial amplification. Is that legislative limitation still in place or are schools now being built to a more appropriate standard? Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC ----- > This is the most ludricous arguement I have read yet. I am personally opposed to higher property taxes, but I am not in favor of the chronic illness that mold/bacterial exposure causes when water intrudes into buildings. The children, even if wearing masks as suggested by LS, stand a high risk of becoming permanently injured. The injuries will last a life time and may cause death and an early age. Besides, look at property taxes today. They are sufficient to build safe schools. The politicians, school authorities, architects and constractors are the ones who actually refuse to build safe schools. For example, I am involved in a case near Corpus Christi, Texas where improper sealing of pipes, window, and celing wall plates junctures occurred. When the new 10 million dollar building was open, water came into the building along with mold and bacteria. It took another 10 million to repair and some of the occupants are still ill. Many of the affected children graduated but the staff remained behind. Als > > Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D. > Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist > www.drthrasher.org > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2007 Report Share Posted December 1, 2007 Dr. Thrasher, I agree with everything you said. I just have another fear for this country which I was mostly trying to express which is that our leaders are throwing our future away by ignoring the need to update educational priorities for the 21st century. I used to work in a very technical field, like yourself, and I am acutely aware of how few students coming out of college these days are really prepared for the kind of work that they will need to be able to do to get a job. I get the very strong feeling that the long term economic picture for this country is dismal unless we change the ways we fund education, nationally. Property taxes are not the right way because using property taxes ensures that poor districts remain poor and rich districts remain rich. That is the state of things these days. Kids who don't have math or science literacy are not going to be able to get decent jobs. Some home schooled and charter schooled kids are very good but many are not. I don't know what we can do, I agree, sending kids back to schools that are poisoning them is not the answer but what do you say to parents who don't have the alternative of putting their child in a private school. (most don't) This is a really terrible situation. In many communities, that money to fix things is NOT going to appear. Lawsuits don't create more money in poor communities either. I am trying to think, what is the long term solution and the only solution I can think of is building new schools and that is going to take Federal money. On Dec 1, 2007 10:32 AM, Jack Thrasher, Ph.D. <toxicologist1@...> wrote: > This is the most ludricous arguement I have read yet. I am personally > opposed to higher property taxes, but I am not in favor of the chronic > illness that mold/bacterial exposure causes when water intrudes into > buildings. The children, even if wearing masks as suggested by LS, stand a > high risk of becoming permanently injured. The injuries will last a life > time and may cause death and an early age. Besides, look at property taxes > today. They are sufficient to build safe schools. The politicians, school > authorities, architects and constractors are the ones who actually refuse to > build safe schools. For example, I am involved in a case near Corpus > Christi, Texas where improper sealing of pipes, window, and celing wall > plates junctures occurred. When the new 10 million dollar building was open, > water came into the building along with mold and bacteria. It took another > 10 million to repair and some of the occupants are still ill. Many of the > affected children graduated but the staff remained behind. Also, some of the > new repairs were not done correctly. There are many more schools throughout > the country in the same condition. My recommendation is to replace those who > are responsible with individuals are are concerned with the health and > welfare of our children. We do not have to raise or lower taxes in order to > build safer schools. > > Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D. > Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist > www.drthrasher.org > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2007 Report Share Posted December 1, 2007 The cost of remediations are much higher than they should be. If there is one thing that could be changed to make this situation a little more manageable its that. We need an initative to build a national technical partnership without a hidden agenda to come in and research ways to make these older buildings safe without spending obscene amounts of money. I know we would all like to replace them but that money isn't there, and it won't materialize. Using the economics of scale, we could thnk out ways to get from where we are (many unsafe schools) to safe buildings and schools. OLDER SCHOOLS OFTEN HAVE SOME ADVANTAGES TOO.. like not having as many formaldehyde-laden woods in them, etc. Its a multi-factorial problem.. There ARE ways to deal with the situation as long as we don't make the same mistakes that we have in the past which is letting any single INDUSTRY tell us how we can give them our money and get very little in return. I'm sorry, I am ranting again.. but do you all understand what I am getting at? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2007 Report Share Posted December 1, 2007 Another thing I have read is that many of these older buildings had fairly sophisticated heating and (for their time) ventilation systems that have been disabled or overridden with crappy modern HVAC systems that generate mold because nobody knew how they worked. And that buildings designed to hold say, 1000 people might be holding 2000 now without modification. Many schools have had their windows locked shut for security reasons, etc. The list of issus is long. Buildings that have had longterm mold issues need to be cleaned down to the insides of their walls and every moldy piece of anything needs to be replaced. Dry ice blasting and complete replacement - That kind of stuff being left and the money being spent on overpriced 'consultants' instead of elbow grease to fix the situations - is simply not acceptable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 DITTO!!!!! I'm a former teacher and have been saying the same thing for years!!!! I believe that the future leaders of America are in great danger! Some thing needs to be done immediately if not sooner, but unfortunately it's just not going to happen soon enough for most. Sue Dr. Thrasher, I agree with everything you said. I just have another fear for this country which I was mostly trying to express which is that our leaders are throwing our future away by ignoring the need to update educational priorities for the 21st century. I used to work in a very technical field, like yourself, and I am acutely aware of how few students coming out of college these days are really prepared for the kind of work that they will need to be able to do to get a job. I get the very strong feeling that the long term economic picture for this country is dismal unless we change the ways we fund education, nationally. Property taxes are not the right way because using property taxes ensures that poor districts remain poor and rich districts remain rich. That is the state of things these days. Kids who don't have math or science literacy are not going to be able to get decent jobs. Some home schooled and charter schooled kids are very good but many are not. I don't know what we can do, I agree, sending kids back to schools that are poisoning them is not the answer but what do you say to parents who don't have the alternative of putting their child in a private school. (most don't) This is a really terrible situation. In many communities, that money to fix things is NOT going to appear. Lawsuits don't create more money in poor communities either. I am trying to think, what is the long term solution and the only solution I can think of is building new schools and that is going to take Federal money **************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest products. (http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 Good for your son!!! I wish all the parents and children at my old school could hear his story. Good luck. I hope and pray he will remain healthy and well. Westview high school was built and opened in August 1997. In june of 1998 during the summer when nobody was there, the HVAC failed and two weeks went unnoticed because nobody was in the building. The water and condensation grew mold. I have been told by teachers there was slime everywhere, lockers, floors, walls, desks, books, vents etc. They said you could skate on the slime. This is what I would call a fairly new building. I did not know this happened until November 2005 as we moved in to this state in 2002. When my son started getting sick, I started researching. Actually 98 percent of the parents didn't seem to be aware of this happening. My son said he wouldn't return to that building unless it was completely torn to the ground and rebuilt. He knows that won't happen so he's staying in the new school 25 miles from our home. He is having a good school year. He knows he is not valued by Weakley County School administration and neither are the other children. He chooses not to return. Intelligent young man of 17 years old. --- In **************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest products. (http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 Westview high school was built and opened in August 1997. In june of 1998 during the summer when nobody was there, the HVAC failed and two weeks went unnoticed because nobody was in the building. The water and condensation grew mold. I have been told by teachers there was slime everywhere, lockers, floors, walls, desks, books, vents etc. They said you could skate on the slime. This is what I would call a fairly new building. I did not know this happened until November 2005 as we moved in to this state in 2002. When my son started getting sick, I started researching. Actually 98 percent of the parents didn't seem to be aware of this happening. My son said he wouldn't return to that building unless it was completely torn to the ground and rebuilt. He knows that won't happen so he's staying in the new school 25 miles from our home. He is having a good school year. He knows he is not valued by Weakley County School administration and neither are the other children. He chooses not to return. Intelligent young man of 17 years old. > > Another thing I have read is that many of these older buildings had > fairly sophisticated heating and (for their time) ventilation systems > that have been disabled or overridden with crappy modern HVAC systems > that generate mold because nobody knew how they worked. > > And that buildings designed to hold say, 1000 people might be holding > 2000 now without modification. Many schools have had their windows > locked shut for security reasons, etc. The list of issus is long. > > Buildings that have had longterm mold issues need to be cleaned down > to the insides of their walls and every moldy piece of anything needs > to be replaced. > > Dry ice blasting and complete replacement - That kind of stuff being > left and the money being spent on overpriced 'consultants' instead of > elbow grease to fix the situations - is simply not acceptable. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 Yes, LiveSimply, I understand what you are saying. You have some excellent ideas. Wouldn't it be great if we could take all of this expertise and create our own company and implement changes that would help save lives!! Unfortunately, the government and the insurance companies would not allow it. LiveSimply <quackadillian@...> wrote: The cost of remediations are much higher than they should be. If there is one thing that could be changed to make this situation a little more manageable its that. We need an initative to build a national technical partnership without a hidden agenda to come in and research ways to make these older buildings safe without spending obscene amounts of money. I know we would all like to replace them but that money isn't there, and it won't materialize. Using the economics of scale, we could thnk out ways to get from where we are (many unsafe schools) to safe buildings and schools. OLDER SCHOOLS OFTEN HAVE SOME ADVANTAGES TOO.. like not having as many formaldehyde-laden woods in them, etc. Its a multi-factorial problem.. There ARE ways to deal with the situation as long as we don't make the same mistakes that we have in the past which is letting any single INDUSTRY tell us how we can give them our money and get very little in return. I'm sorry, I am ranting again.. but do you all understand what I am getting at? --------------------------------- Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2007 Report Share Posted December 4, 2007 you're absolutely right. and honestly, if i hadn't gotten sick from mold exposure, i would have been like everyone else (who's never been exposed) and not realize how how much havoc it can cause on one's body. :-( > > , it's called apathy. Unless something affects those people > personally, they'd rather not bother helping the victims. > > Barth > --- > > x> what surprised me was that there were less than 100 protestors. i > x> don't know the full story, but if half the student body + their > x> parents were to get involved, then just maybe the mold problem would > x> be remediated...or if the high schoolers were to transfer to another > x> school, that may get the schoolboard's attention. > > x> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2007 Report Share Posted December 4, 2007 My family and I have felt as if we've been on an island by ourselves in this mold battle for two years. We aren't completely alone any longer. There are seven families involved now but most of the people are very apathetic. I cannot wrap my brain around this; the apathy and " this won't happen to my child " so I'm not getting involved kind of parent. Probably 98 percent of the parents were unaware of the true condition of the school,but now they know because of media coverage. There were not more students at the protest because the administration and the athletic coaches threatened all athletes they would benched and NOT be playing their sport if they participated in the protest. What is really ironic about the coaches is that their particular hall/olassrooms have some of the worst mold conditions in the school. All students were threatened with out-of-school suspension. There were still more than 80 brave, courageous students who took the chance and participated. I thank them from the bottom of my heart for their bravery and show of care and concern. They were the smart ones. This school administration in this school district is beyond comprehension. I've never seen anything like them, although I know from information on this website, there are FAR too many of their kind out there. --- In , " xhannahx24 " <xhannahx24@...> wrote: > > you're absolutely right. > > and honestly, if i hadn't gotten sick from mold exposure, i would have > been like everyone else (who's never been exposed) and not realize how > how much havoc it can cause on one's body. :-( > > > > > --- In , Patilla DaHun <glypella@> wrote: > > > > , it's called apathy. Unless something affects those people > > personally, they'd rather not bother helping the victims. > > > > Barth > > > --- > > > > x> what surprised me was that there were less than 100 protestors. i > > x> don't know the full story, but if half the student body + their > > x> parents were to get involved, then just maybe the mold problem would > > x> be remediated...or if the high schoolers were to transfer to another > > x> school, that may get the schoolboard's attention. > > > > x> > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.