Guest guest Posted November 21, 2007 Report Share Posted November 21, 2007 Carondeen: What you and others do not realize is that your are probably colonized with mold. The lalte Dr. Marinkovich firmly believed that this is what is occuring. An as example, indivdiuals with Aspergllosis from A. fumigatus, versicolor, ustus and niger have an infectious process going on. Also, the mycotoxin, Gliotoxin, as been demonstrated in lung secretions and sera of these patients. Those who do not want you to know the truth deny that mold colonization can take place in people with fairly normal immune systems. For your and others information gliotoxins are immune suppressing mycotoxins. Other mycotoxins can also have adverse affects on the immune system. Thus, you carry you illness with you no matter where you may go. Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D. Toxicologist Immunotoxicologist Fetal Toxicologyist toxicologist1@... [] Re: Need Help! Does mold remediation work? Please take my advice-do not by any means attempt to remediate- move- I have been fighting this illness now for many years, and if there is one thing I have learned-it is that taking extreme precautions early in the illness may pay off later in being able to have a life. Not being extreme enough will only mean continual moves and less and less healthy days. The more you are exposed the sicker you become-even with almost no toxin. I can now not live in even a normal house- I have tried remediation-if you are sensitized it will not work. > These results are for our moldy house #2. (We evacuated moldy house #1 about 7 months ago). We are highly sensitized to mold and are having symptoms from our new house already. We even brought contamination back with us to the hotel we're staying in. The industrial hygienist thinks the house can be remediated and we should be able to live in it. > > Any advice? Has anyone successfully remediated a moldy house? Thanks so much in advance.. > > Mold Hostage > > > --------------------------------- > Never miss a thing. Make your homepage. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2007 Report Share Posted November 21, 2007 Dear Dr. Thrasher, The other day I read that stachybotrys can produce a cyclosporin that suppresses the immune system, that is 1/3 as potent as cyclosporin A. (I'm reposting the PubMed abstract below) I've repeatedly seen it stated by those who should know that many mycotoxins in their role as immunotoxic compounds can also cause (many) autoimmune diseases and it makes total sense but I don't know the approach to locate, key phrases to use, etc. to find the science behind these particular mold driven toxic processes. There is TONS of stuff on T2 toxin and other of the non-macrocyclic trichothecenes that seemed to occur during a spurt of research during the 80s but I have not seen much else on immunotoxicity except one or two statements that the macrocyclic trichothecenes were much stronger and not much specif data other than one thing by Ueno (I forget the ref, I only have the abstract) on satratoxin H (I think) in which he says that the stachybotrys mycotoxins in general are the most immunotoxic, thats it. I don't have the paper, just the short abstract. No more. If you had any resources to point me to on mold and possible etiology of autoimmune disease, I'd appreciate it. This begs the question, why isn't research being done because this clearly is a BIG part of the health puzzle and its being left to the imagination? Technical is fine, I try to absorb as much as I can and learn what I need to learn as best as I can. Here is the cyclosporin in stachybotrys link. Cyclosporin isn't a trichothecene, I am gathering. Do you know of any references on its effects in chronic, low level exposure situations? J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1993 Dec;46(12):1788-98. Erratum in: * J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1994 Feb;47(2):C-1. FR901459, a novel immunosuppressant isolated from Stachybotrys chartarum No. 19392. Taxonomy of the producing organism, fermentation, isolation, physico-chemical properties and biological activities. Sakamoto K, Tsujii E, Miyauchi M, Nakanishi T, Yamashita M, Shigematsu N, Tada T, Izumi S, Okuhara M. Exploratory Research Laboratories, Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Ibaraki, Japan. FR901459, a novel immunosuppressant, has been isolated from the fermentation broth of Stachybotrys chartarum No. 19392. The molecular formula of FR901459 was determined as C62H111N11O13. FR901459 was found to be a member of the cyclosporin family. However, it is structurally distinct from any other cyclosporins discovered so far, in that Leu is present at position 5 instead of Val. FR901459 was capable of prolonging the survival time of skin allografts in rats with one third the potency of cyclosporin A. Publication Types: * Comparative Study PMID: 8294235 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] On Nov 21, 2007 4:04 PM, Jack Thrasher, Ph.D. <toxicologist1@...> wrote: > > Carondeen: What you and others do not realize is that your are probably > colonized with mold. The lalte Dr. Marinkovich firmly believed that this is > what is occuring. An as example, indivdiuals with Aspergllosis from A. > fumigatus, versicolor, ustus and niger have an infectious process going on. > Also, the mycotoxin, Gliotoxin, as been demonstrated in lung secretions and > sera of these patients. Those who do not want you to know the truth deny > that mold colonization can take place in people with fairly normal immune > systems. For your and others information gliotoxins are immune suppressing > mycotoxins. Other mycotoxins can also have adverse affects on the immune > system. Thus, you carry you illness with you no matter where you may go. > > Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D. > Toxicologist > Immunotoxicologist > Fetal Toxicologyist > toxicologist1@... > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2007 Report Share Posted November 21, 2007 I doubt that you totally regained your health. Most likely you felt a 1000 % better. Once you returmed to a close environment with all the chemicals and possibly mold that are present, your illness came back. Mold victims develop a variety of chemical sensitivities. Since the death of Dr. Marinkovich, the physicians in the country that do full diagnosis and treatment are Gray, Benson, Arizona and several others. [] Re: Need Help! Does mold remediation work? > > > Please take my advice-do not by any means attempt to remediate- move- > I have been fighting this illness now for many years, and if there is > one thing I have learned-it is that taking extreme precautions early > in the illness may pay off later in being able to have a life. Not > being extreme enough will only mean continual moves and less and less > healthy days. The more you are exposed the sicker you become-even > with almost no toxin. I can now not live in even a normal house- I > have tried remediation-if you are sensitized it will not work. > > > These results are for our moldy house #2. (We evacuated moldy > house #1 about 7 months ago). We are highly sensitized to mold and > are having symptoms from our new house already. We even brought > contamination back with us to the hotel we're staying in. The > industrial hygienist thinks the house can be remediated and we should > be able to live in it. > > > > Any advice? Has anyone successfully remediated a moldy house? > Thanks so much in advance.. > > > > Mold Hostage > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > Never miss a thing. Make your homepage. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2007 Report Share Posted November 21, 2007 It is 10:00 PM on the West Coast. I am going to bed and will answer and comment tomorrow morning. Good night to all and have a Happy Thanksgiving. [] Re: Need Help! Does mold remediation work? totally agree with your last sentence-- " Thus, you carry you illness with you no matter where you may go " . until deep detoxification occurs, any *improvement* or well-being felt will be temporary. > > Carondeen: What you and others do not realize is that your are probably colonized with mold. The lalte Dr. Marinkovich firmly believed that this is what is occuring. An as example, indivdiuals with Aspergllosis from A. fumigatus, versicolor, ustus and niger have an infectious process going on. Also, the mycotoxin, Gliotoxin, as been demonstrated in lung secretions and sera of these patients. Those who do not want you to know the truth deny that mold colonization can take place in people with fairly normal immune systems. For your and others information gliotoxins are immune suppressing mycotoxins. Other mycotoxins can also have adverse affects on the immune system. Thus, you carry you illness with you no matter where you may go. > > Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D. > Toxicologist > Immunotoxicologist > Fetal Toxicologyist > toxicologist1@... > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2007 Report Share Posted November 22, 2007 Dr. Thrasher, Have a Wonderful and Happy Thanksgiving. Darlene [] Re: Need Help! Does mold remediation work? totally agree with your last sentence-- " Thus, you carry you illness with you no matter where you may go " . until deep detoxification occurs, any *improvement* or well-being felt will be temporary. > > Carondeen: What you and others do not realize is that your are probably colonized with mold. The lalte Dr. Marinkovich firmly believed that this is what is occuring. An as example, indivdiuals with Aspergllosis from A. fumigatus, versicolor, ustus and niger have an infectious process going on. Also, the mycotoxin, Gliotoxin, as been demonstrated in lung secretions and sera of these patients. Those who do not want you to know the truth deny that mold colonization can take place in people with fairly normal immune systems. For your and others information gliotoxins are immune suppressing mycotoxins. Other mycotoxins can also have adverse affects on the immune system. Thus, you carry you illness with you no matter where you may go. > > Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D. > Toxicologist > Immunotoxicologist > Fetal Toxicologyist > toxicologist1@ ... > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2007 Report Share Posted November 22, 2007 : you are absolutely correct. Researchers at the May Clinic, NY have demonstrated in my professional opinion that molds cause chronic sinusitis and can be isolated from the sinuses. If one has chronic sinusitis that is refractory to antibiotics, then biops or sinus washings should be cultured for mold. [] Re: Need Help! Does mold remediation work? totally agree with your last sentence-- " Thus, you carry you illness with you no matter where you may go " . until deep detoxification occurs, any *improvement* or well-being felt will be temporary. > > Carondeen: What you and others do not realize is that your are probably colonized with mold. The lalte Dr. Marinkovich firmly believed that this is what is occuring. An as example, indivdiuals with Aspergllosis from A. fumigatus, versicolor, ustus and niger have an infectious process going on. Also, the mycotoxin, Gliotoxin, as been demonstrated in lung secretions and sera of these patients. Those who do not want you to know the truth deny that mold colonization can take place in people with fairly normal immune systems. For your and others information gliotoxins are immune suppressing mycotoxins. Other mycotoxins can also have adverse affects on the immune system. Thus, you carry you illness with you no matter where you may go. > > Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D. > Toxicologist > Immunotoxicologist > Fetal Toxicologyist > toxicologist1@... > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2007 Report Share Posted November 22, 2007 If stachy was found, I'd be very nervous because that indicates long term HIGH levels of moisture. Here is something to think about. Water permeation of a building with stachy may have permeated it with mycotoxins. I read some relatively new research the other day (see first abstract below) that some stachybotrys mycotoxins are water soluble which implies to me that if there was a very bad stachybotrys problem in a building, the building might have dissolved mycotoxins in any building materials that had been water saturated in close proximity to stachybotrys mold. (see the two papers below) To me, that may mean that to completely get rid of the toxicity in a building that had had an extreme stachy situation over a long time, it might have to be gutted and all porous materials replaced. Imagine the cost of stripping it down to its wooden frame, perhaps sand or dry ice blasting the top quarter or so inch of wood off that frame, even, and then having to completely rebuild it, floor walls, windows, everything. That could cost a lot. If there are spaces iside the walls that have mold inside of them, also don't expect them to say 'here we are' on tests. They don't, they are hard to find. Another recent study showed that 99% of the spores in stachy growth remain attached to the conidaphores, even under typical wind conditions. That says to me that we see a LOT of false negatives when spore tests are the only kind of tests done. A LOT. Because spore testing relies on spores just blowing into them or being deposited on them. Stchybotrys only sporulates when its dying. If a building has been unoccupied, and dry, the stachy in the walls will be dead and wont sporulate. It wont be found unless you go looking for it or are living there and get sick from it and realize it right away. The implications of both of these study results when taken together is pretty scary for those hoping to remediate buildings with serious, longterm water damage economically. It also runs counter to what most remediators profess to believe (that stachybotrys mycotoxins are not soluable in water and also, - separate issue - that the results of spore tests are in some way proportionate to the amount of health issues in a building.) One could make an argument that there is a very good chance that many buildings that had been repeatedly flooded and which had had stachybotrys problems it would make more sense to switch into a mode that emphasized removal and replacement of all water soluable building materials down to the studs, rather than spending precious money on cycles of testing in a futile hope that a building could be superficially remediated without replacing all the sheetrock.., etc. The reason being that testing would be likely to show false negatives and indicate the building was safe when it wasn't. Spore testing that shows spores present at a given time and place do show spores present at that time and spot. Its just that they often wont show stachy spores that may exist in situations just a few feet away, where there is a major stachy problem inside the walls. Also, a mycotoxin problem that is a legacy of long periods of mold growth- that wont show up on spore tests at all, the spores would likely have long ago turned to dust, but the toxins can persist and they do clearly then still make people sick. J Microbiol Methods. 2006 Aug;66(2):354-61. Epub 2006 Feb 23. Solvent comparison in the isolation, solubilization, and toxicity of Stachybotrys chartarum spore trichothecene mycotoxins in an established in vitro luminescence protein translation inhibition assay. Black JA, Foarde KK, Menetrez MY. Microbiology Department, RTI, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. jab@... It is well known that non-viable mold contaminants such as macrocyclic trichothecene mycotoxins of Stachybotrys chartarum are highly toxinigenic to humans. However, the method of recovering native mycotoxin has been without consensus. Inconsistencies occur in the methods of isolation, suspension, preparation, and quantitation of the mycotoxin from the spores. The purpose of this study was to provide quantitatively comparative data on three concurrent preparations of 10(6)S. chartarum spores. The experiments were designed to specifically evaluate a novel method of mycotoxin extraction, solubilization, and the subsequent inhibitory effect in an established in vitro luminescence protein translation assay from 30 day-old spores. The mycotoxin-containing spores swabbed from wallboard cultures were milled with and without glass beads in 100% methanol, 95% ethanol, or water. Milled spore lysates were cleared of cell debris by filter centrifugation followed by a second centrifugation through a 5000 MWCO filter to remove interfering proteins and RNases. Cleared lysate was concentrated by centrivap and suspended in either alcohol or water as described. The suspensions were used immediately in the in vitro luminescence protein translation assay with the trichothecene, T-2 toxin, as a control. Although, mycotoxin is reported to be alcohol soluble, the level of translation inhibition was not reliably satisfactory for either the methanol or ethanol preparations. In fact, the methanol and ethanol control reactions were not significantly different than the alcohol prepared spore samples. In addition, we observed that increasing amounts of either alcohol inhibited the reaction in a dose dependent manner. This suggests that although alcohol isolation of mycotoxin is desirable in terms of time and labor, the presence of alcohol in the luminescence protein translation reaction was not acceptable. Conversely, water extraction of mycotoxin demonstrated a dose dependent response, and there was significant difference between the water controls and the water extracted mycotoxin reactions. In our hands, water was the best extraction agent for mycotoxin when using this specific luminescence protein translation assay kit. PMID: 16497399 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] also (showing why spore testing of air and swabs will show false negatives) Fungal Genet Biol. 2007 Jul;44(7):641-7. Epub 2006 Dec 24. Links Biomechanics of conidial dispersal in the toxic mold Stachybotrys chartarum. Tucker K, Stolze JL, Kennedy AH, Money NP. Department of Botany, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA. Conidial dispersal in Stachybotrys chartarum in response to low-velocity airflow was studied using a microflow apparatus. The maximum rate of spore release occurred during the first 5 min of airflow, followed by a dramatic reduction in dispersal that left more than 99% of the conidia attached to their conidiophores. Micromanipulation of undisturbed colonies showed that micronewton (microN) forces were needed to dislodge spore clusters from their supporting conidiophores. Calculations show that airspeeds that normally prevail in the indoor environment disturb colonies with forces that are 1000-fold lower, in the nanonewton (nN) range. Low-velocity airflow does not, therefore, cause sufficient disturbance to disperse a large proportion of the conidia of S. chartarum. PMID: 17267247 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] also Detection of Airborne Stachybotrys chartarum Macrocyclic Trichothecene Mycotoxins in the Indoor Environment http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/full/71/11/7376 also Detection of Airborne Stachybotrys chartarum Macrocyclic Trichothecene Mycotoxins on Particulates Smaller than Conidia http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/full/71/1/114 etc.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2007 Report Share Posted November 23, 2007 Yes. Many mycotoxins are water soluble. Yes, stachy spores do not get into the air very readily. If they are in an air sample then the infestation of the home/bulding is very heavy. Stachy spores only get released upon dessicattion and disturbing the colony. This is one reason that bulk sample of materials is very important. Although stachy is no in the air, bulk samples will reveal either the modl by culture or its mycotoxins. Also, when culturing stachy it is very fastidious and other molds will crowd it out. Specific cultures must be done to reveal stachybotrys. Re: [] Re: Need Help! Does mold remediation work? If stachy was found, I'd be very nervous because that indicates long term HIGH levels of moisture. Here is something to think about. Water permeation of a building with stachy may have permeated it with mycotoxins. I read some relatively new research the other day (see first abstract below) that some stachybotrys mycotoxins are water soluble which implies to me that if there was a very bad stachybotrys problem in a building, the building might have dissolved mycotoxins in any building materials that had been water saturated in close proximity to stachybotrys mold. (see the two papers below) To me, that may mean that to completely get rid of the toxicity in a building that had had an extreme stachy situation over a long time, it might have to be gutted and all porous materials replaced. Imagine the cost of stripping it down to its wooden frame, perhaps sand or dry ice blasting the top quarter or so inch of wood off that frame, even, and then having to completely rebuild it, floor walls, windows, everything. That could cost a lot. If there are spaces iside the walls that have mold inside of them, also don't expect them to say 'here we are' on tests. They don't, they are hard to find. Another recent study showed that 99% of the spores in stachy growth remain attached to the conidaphores, even under typical wind conditions. That says to me that we see a LOT of false negatives when spore tests are the only kind of tests done. A LOT. Because spore testing relies on spores just blowing into them or being deposited on them. Stchybotrys only sporulates when its dying. If a building has been unoccupied, and dry, the stachy in the walls will be dead and wont sporulate. It wont be found unless you go looking for it or are living there and get sick from it and realize it right away. The implications of both of these study results when taken together is pretty scary for those hoping to remediate buildings with serious, longterm water damage economically. It also runs counter to what most remediators profess to believe (that stachybotrys mycotoxins are not soluable in water and also, - separate issue - that the results of spore tests are in some way proportionate to the amount of health issues in a building.) One could make an argument that there is a very good chance that many buildings that had been repeatedly flooded and which had had stachybotrys problems it would make more sense to switch into a mode that emphasized removal and replacement of all water soluable building materials down to the studs, rather than spending precious money on cycles of testing in a futile hope that a building could be superficially remediated without replacing all the sheetrock.., etc. The reason being that testing would be likely to show false negatives and indicate the building was safe when it wasn't. Spore testing that shows spores present at a given time and place do show spores present at that time and spot. Its just that they often wont show stachy spores that may exist in situations just a few feet away, where there is a major stachy problem inside the walls. Also, a mycotoxin problem that is a legacy of long periods of mold growth- that wont show up on spore tests at all, the spores would likely have long ago turned to dust, but the toxins can persist and they do clearly then still make people sick. J Microbiol Methods. 2006 Aug;66(2):354-61. Epub 2006 Feb 23. Solvent comparison in the isolation, solubilization, and toxicity of Stachybotrys chartarum spore trichothecene mycotoxins in an established in vitro luminescence protein translation inhibition assay. Black JA, Foarde KK, Menetrez MY. Microbiology Department, RTI, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. jab@... It is well known that non-viable mold contaminants such as macrocyclic trichothecene mycotoxins of Stachybotrys chartarum are highly toxinigenic to humans. However, the method of recovering native mycotoxin has been without consensus. Inconsistencies occur in the methods of isolation, suspension, preparation, and quantitation of the mycotoxin from the spores. The purpose of this study was to provide quantitatively comparative data on three concurrent preparations of 10(6)S. chartarum spores. The experiments were designed to specifically evaluate a novel method of mycotoxin extraction, solubilization, and the subsequent inhibitory effect in an established in vitro luminescence protein translation assay from 30 day-old spores. The mycotoxin-containing spores swabbed from wallboard cultures were milled with and without glass beads in 100% methanol, 95% ethanol, or water. Milled spore lysates were cleared of cell debris by filter centrifugation followed by a second centrifugation through a 5000 MWCO filter to remove interfering proteins and RNases. Cleared lysate was concentrated by centrivap and suspended in either alcohol or water as described. The suspensions were used immediately in the in vitro luminescence protein translation assay with the trichothecene, T-2 toxin, as a control. Although, mycotoxin is reported to be alcohol soluble, the level of translation inhibition was not reliably satisfactory for either the methanol or ethanol preparations. In fact, the methanol and ethanol control reactions were not significantly different than the alcohol prepared spore samples. In addition, we observed that increasing amounts of either alcohol inhibited the reaction in a dose dependent manner. This suggests that although alcohol isolation of mycotoxin is desirable in terms of time and labor, the presence of alcohol in the luminescence protein translation reaction was not acceptable. Conversely, water extraction of mycotoxin demonstrated a dose dependent response, and there was significant difference between the water controls and the water extracted mycotoxin reactions. In our hands, water was the best extraction agent for mycotoxin when using this specific luminescence protein translation assay kit. PMID: 16497399 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] also (showing why spore testing of air and swabs will show false negatives) Fungal Genet Biol. 2007 Jul;44(7):641-7. Epub 2006 Dec 24. Links Biomechanics of conidial dispersal in the toxic mold Stachybotrys chartarum. Tucker K, Stolze JL, Kennedy AH, Money NP. Department of Botany, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA. Conidial dispersal in Stachybotrys chartarum in response to low-velocity airflow was studied using a microflow apparatus. The maximum rate of spore release occurred during the first 5 min of airflow, followed by a dramatic reduction in dispersal that left more than 99% of the conidia attached to their conidiophores. Micromanipulation of undisturbed colonies showed that micronewton (microN) forces were needed to dislodge spore clusters from their supporting conidiophores. Calculations show that airspeeds that normally prevail in the indoor environment disturb colonies with forces that are 1000-fold lower, in the nanonewton (nN) range. Low-velocity airflow does not, therefore, cause sufficient disturbance to disperse a large proportion of the conidia of S. chartarum. PMID: 17267247 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] also Detection of Airborne Stachybotrys chartarum Macrocyclic Trichothecene Mycotoxins in the Indoor Environment http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/full/71/11/7376 also Detection of Airborne Stachybotrys chartarum Macrocyclic Trichothecene Mycotoxins on Particulates Smaller than Conidia http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/full/71/1/114 etc.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 24, 2007 Report Share Posted November 24, 2007 Do you know how they say that every woman has the total number of eggs that she is going to have at some early age.. and when they get used up, she goes into menopause? Thats why they suggest that women who have cancer that are going to get chemotherapy have some eggs removed in case they want to have children later. Radiation and chemotherapy cause early menarche. Many chemotherapy drugs are based on mycotoxins and their effects seem to be similar. There are quite a few things that might be happening. Cells can only divide a certain number of times. Something called a telomere limits the total number of divisions. Its known that mold toxins damage cells all over the body through oxidative stress and that damage needs to be repaired which I think uses up the cells allowable number of divisions. Perhaps that is one of the reasons why the damage from mold becomes harder for the body to repair as it gets older, simply your supply of those various cells, like stem cells get used up by having to repair the damage over and over? So, in that sense, mold may be basically stealing your 'life' in a way much more realistic than simple passage of time or damage to organs could explain. its not only damaging them and taking a chunk of time out of your ability to enjoy life, your health, your career and work, its also stealing your body's quite possibly finite and limited number of possible cell divisions that it uses to repair itself. At least that is what I suspect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.