Guest guest Posted December 29, 2007 Report Share Posted December 29, 2007 KC: Hope yours and all who visit and appreciate the " Sickbuildings " board have a very happy New Year. Thank you so very much for your comments. A couple years ago I made some promises that we would have some major developments wherein mold exposures and illness are concerned. I believed then that this news would arise from the massive mold exposure problems that Air Traffic Controllers are continuing to face in Control Towers across the nation (which the FAA has all but put on its very low priority list). I was one of four original consulting experts on environmental health that had been contacted for this arbitration/litigation process. I chose to depart from that process, mainly due to the " snail pace " of the case. When a team we organized to visit Washington DC in April 2007 to speak with members of the Senate and Congress, the president of the Detroit Metro Air Traffic Controller's Association chapter accompanied us. Others who dedicated their time and own expenses to make the trip and contribute greatly were Dr. Jack Thrasher (Expert Toxicologist, exp., environmental fungi and health), Dr. Dennis Hooper (Medical Mycology/Genetic Researcher), Ms. Cheryl Bossio, Esq. (expert plaintiff's attorney greatly experienced in litigating mold exposure health-related cases), Overton, Esq. (who also is experienced with mold and health litigation). These people have been working hard either behind the scenes or publicly to bring about greatly needed change. My thought then was that 2007 was going to be a positive-explosive year for mold exposure victims. This visit WAS successful in its own right, and Sharon Kramer's work to this regard has been nothing less than exceptional, given the pressures and fiscal issues facing her in her own litigation matter, but what has happened in reality with all of our efforts in 2007, is that what we have accomplished as set up 2008 as a banner year for mold victims. In January several things will start to happen to demonstrate clearly what I am telling you now. Look for news coming out of Sacramento, California concerning this topic. And, remember all throughout 2008, that you heard it here on " Sickbuildings " first. Sometime between January 7-11, I will write " THE " post that I have been waiting to write for over 11-years, AND I will guarantee that we will have some delightful fun with all of those " naysayers " who have expressed the views/writings that " mold exposures are not harmful. " God Bless and take care. Doug Haney EnviroHealth Research & Consulting, Inc. Email: _Haney52@... @...: tigerpaw2c@...: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 03:08:40 +0000Subject: [] Re: EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW, 2007 Doug,Thank you very much for this post. It is one of the best I have even seen on explaining the Ig panels. Very informative and easy to understand. Now if we can only get the rest of our physicians to grasp this information we would all be better off. KC--- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2007 Report Share Posted December 29, 2007 Doug, Don't leave us hanging!!!! What happens Jan 7th thru the 11th?? What are we missing? Can you give us a hint? Regards a Haney <_Haney52@...> wrote: KC: Hope yours and all who visit and appreciate the " Sickbuildings " board have a very happy New Year. Thank you so very much for your comments. A couple years ago I made some promises that we would have some major developments wherein mold exposures and illness are concerned. I believed then that this news would arise from the massive mold exposure problems that Air Traffic Controllers are continuing to face in Control Towers across the nation (which the FAA has all but put on its very low priority list). I was one of four original consulting experts on environmental health that had been contacted for this arbitration/litigation process. I chose to depart from that process, mainly due to the " snail pace " of the case. When a team we organized to visit Washington DC in April 2007 to speak with members of the Senate and Congress, the president of the Detroit Metro Air Traffic Controller's Association chapter accompanied us. Others who dedicated their time and own expenses to make the trip and contribute greatly were Dr. Jack Thrasher (Expert Toxicologist, exp., environmental fungi and health), Dr. Dennis Hooper (Medical Mycology/Genetic Researcher), Ms. Cheryl Bossio, Esq. (expert plaintiff's attorney greatly experienced in litigating mold exposure health-related cases), Overton, Esq. (who also is experienced with mold and health litigation). These people have been working hard either behind the scenes or publicly to bring about greatly needed change. My thought then was that 2007 was going to be a positive-explosive year for mold exposure victims. This visit WAS successful in its own right, and Sharon Kramer's work to this regard has been nothing less than exceptional, given the pressures and fiscal issues facing her in her own litigation matter, but what has happened in reality with all of our efforts in 2007, is that what we have accomplished as set up 2008 as a banner year for mold victims. In January several things will start to happen to demonstrate clearly what I am telling you now. Look for news coming out of Sacramento, California concerning this topic. And, remember all throughout 2008, that you heard it here on " Sickbuildings " first. Sometime between January 7-11, I will write " THE " post that I have been waiting to write for over 11-years, AND I will guarantee that we will have some delightful fun with all of those " naysayers " who have expressed the views/writings that " mold exposures are not harmful. " God Bless and take care. Doug Haney EnviroHealth Research & Consulting, Inc. Email: _Haney52@... @...: tigerpaw2c@...: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 03:08:40 +0000Subject: [] Re: EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW, 2007 Doug,Thank you very much for this post. It is one of the best I have even seen on explaining the Ig panels. Very informative and easy to understand. Now if we can only get the rest of our physicians to grasp this information we would all be better off. KC--- --------------------------------- Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2007 Report Share Posted December 31, 2007 Dr. Thrasher: First, let me say that your wisdom and opinions have always been held in the highest esteem with me, and continue as such. Second, there is no question what so ever that Sharon Kramer's dedicated service to mold exposed victims has been of unparalleled by our trip to Washington, DC, or anything else. And our trip was not meant to compete with anyone or boost anyone's ego. Our mission was clearly spelled out: (Mission/Objective: extracted from the trip report.) WASHINGTON DC MISSION/OBJECTIVE Our primary focus was to educate federal lawmakers and special interest groups as to the scientific facts relating to the complex pathogenic environment to promote serious interest in order to enact responsible legislation that will educate and guide fields involved sufficiently to adequately protect the health and safety of American citizens. The Politicians in Washington clearly demonstrated a proactive interest in the welfare of the American public. They actively listened and posed thoughtful questions in response to the material presented. OUR CALL TO ARMS · Encouraged advanced medical training · Positively impact our fight against human disease. · Investigate dangerous and unhealthy exposures. · Investigate alleged fraudulent concealment, cohesion, and unethical activity · Mandate monitoring with public reporting and accountability · Punish unethical destructive behavior against others and publicly identify the perpetrators to discourage future such activity The team suggested consideration of classification of mold-related diseases as “reportable diseases” by healthcare professionals or facilities by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)., Mold infections have proven to be more difficult to medically diagnose and treat than bacteria or viruses despite the availability genetic analysis to rapidly identify the disease. AUTHOR/COORDINATOR’S SUMMARY For eight years now, I have been planning a trip such as this. Each person who joined our venture in Washington DC paid their own expenses and were not sponsored by any other party. No conflict of interest issues were present. The teams mission was to initiate education as to the seriousness of health issues involving human exposures. We did our best as a cohesive team, and everyone gave outstanding presentations unified in the goal to help educate the decision makers of our nation. There are forces that do not want laws assisting in the health, safety, and prevention of indoor exposures to unhealthy environments to come into effect in the United States. As we push forward and demand full accountability and disclosure it becomes ever clearer who the obstacles are behind the prevention of initiation of safety measures with accountability for all Americans. We are truly fighting a war of economy verses human quality, and the stakes are much higher than other types of warfare because we are fighting invisible entities within our own fold. I believe in the American way of life, and that justice will endure. Dr. Thrasher, as I recall, you went further than any of us in your dedication because you were in quite a bit of pain at the time, and for that reason I consider your participation extraordinary. However, I believe we did accomplish quite a bit as a result of that trip because I have received several calls from congress and senate aids since. To this regard, I do not believe that Sharon Kramer feels anything but respect for our attention to mold exposure health issues, and knowing her as I do, as we have spoken in the past, I believe she feels as I do, that we are all in this effort together. I would welcome many people to visit their political leaders and personally do not care in the least who finally accomplishes the best results as I care about public involvement more than anything. As I have stated before, this public health problem involves a literal WAR between the values of American economics and the sciences AND an American public that has suffered greatly because the " cause and effect " of exposures to indoor pathogenic microfungi and the multitude of products with microfungi and microfungi produced mycotoxins/MVOCs has been terribly neglected and maligned in regard to human health and serious diseases. Beyond that scope of interest, my personal work and efforts are simply part of the overall effort. Third: Dr. Thrasher, until this date, I had no idea of the deep chemical composites of MDF-500. However, your recommendations or not, I have found this to be the very best answer in killing and sustaining the kill ratio of molds, bacteria, and viruses that the government has ever produced as I have personally used it in my home and on my patio area with exceptional results. It was used in a surgical center in Roseville, CA with exceptional results as monitored through standard remediation protocol. One year later, air sampling demonstrated clearly that this product was highly effective. All of your concerns regarding this product's can certainly be answered much better by the manufacturing folks at Modec, Inc., of Denver, CO. The reason I promoted it in Washington DC, was that it was being used for remediation efforts in other federal buildings, nationally by HASMAT teams coast to coast, had been properly reviewed and registered by the CA EPA, and might be useful in the Detroit Metro Control Tower situation, and at the Walter Medical Hosptial. I will continue to suggest its use to anyone who might find it useful. I suffer with MCS, sugar diabetes II (mellitus II), polycystic kidney disease, severe GERD/acid reflux disease, and have 10 species of microfungi at 4-7x the ranges formerly posed by ImmunoSciences Laboratory, and this product's use has done nothing after use in my own home to harm me in any manner. In fact, this year I have felt better than in years past. I can only speak for myself on this subject, but though I absolutely value your opinions, on this one humbly, I submit that I have to waiver and will look into your considerations to a greater degree. Fourth: Thank you for the update on the Detroit metro situation. I am aware of that matter as well as several others around the country. My point overall is that it moved too slowly for my involvement. Prior to your commitment to it I had been reviewing this matter for nearly a year, and that is precisely why I requested that you go to Washington DC, to meet with my friend and then, Detroit Metro Air Traffic Controllers chapter President, Mr. Sugent. I wanted him to meet you and for you to hear of their plight first hand. Another person who should be working with Controllers, nationwide and not just in Detroit, is Dr. Hooper. I have all the faith in the world, that with your expert assistance, and that of Dr. Lipsey (whom I also hold in the highest of esteem), this matter will resolve sooner than later, and that the mold exposed victims who have been made seriously ill as a result of working there, will find effective medical attention as a result. God Bless you and your work, and I wish you and yours the very best New Year. With warmest regard, Doug Haney @...: toxicologist1@...: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 06:03:46 +0000Subject: [] Re: EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW, 2007 Doug: I was on the trip to Washington, D.C. as you stated in the post below. However, I strongly feel that Sharon Kramer's work was of greater benefit to the indoor mold problem than what we accomplished. Also, the Air Traffic Control Towers litigation is on the move. Both Dr. Lipsey and I are involved in this matter. All litigation moves slowly. Finally, I remember on the trip that you were promoting a fogging mixture of chemicals to be used in damp indoor spaces to kill mold and bacteria. I just looked up the California Pesticide Registration of this product at the request of an individual who wanted information on its toxicology. The product is a petroleum distillate of the diesel fuel and kerosene group. I would not recommend this product under any condition, particularly when occupants may have developed MCS or chemical hypersensitivity. The product I am referring to is MDF 500, California Pesticide Registration No. 218536 and 21548. The USEPA number is 80364-1 and 9036r-2. A registered pesticide is a pesticide. If I am wrong please let me know. Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D.>> KC: Hope yours and all who visit and appreciate the " Sickbuildings " board have a very happy New Year. Thank you so very much for your comments. A couple years ago I made some promises that we would have some major developments wherein mold exposures and illness are concerned. I believed then that this news would arise from the massive mold exposure problems that Air Traffic Controllers are continuing to face in Control Towers across the nation (which the FAA has all but put on its very low priority list). I was one of four original consulting experts on environmental health that had been contacted for this arbitration/litigation process. I chose to depart from that process, mainly due to the " snail pace " of the case. When a team we organized to visit Washington DC in April 2007 to speak with members of the Senate and Congress, the president of the Detroit Metro Air Traffic Controller's Association chapter accompanied us. Others who dedicated their time and own expenses to make the trip and contribute greatly were Dr. Jack Thrasher (Expert Toxicologist, exp., environmental fungi and health), Dr. Dennis Hooper (Medical Mycology/Genetic Researcher), Ms. Cheryl Bossio, Esq. (expert plaintiff's attorney greatly experienced in litigating mold exposure health-related cases), Overton, Esq. (who also is experienced with mold and health litigation). These people have been working hard either behind the scenes or publicly to bring about greatly needed change. My thought then was that 2007 was going to be a positive-explosive year for mold exposure victims. This visit WAS successful in its own right, and Sharon Kramer's work to this regard has been nothing less than exceptional, given the pressures and fiscal issues facing her in her own litigation matter, but what has happened in reality with all of our efforts in 2007, is that what we have accomplished as set up 2008 as a banner year for mold victims. In January several things will start to happen to demonstrate clearly what I am telling you now. Look for news coming out of Sacramento, California concerning this topic. And, remember all throughout 2008, that you heard it here on " Sickbuildings " first. Sometime between January 7-11, I will write " THE " post that I have been waiting to write for over 11-years, AND I will guarantee that we will have some delightful fun with all of those " naysayers " who have expressed the views/writings that " mold exposures are not harmful. " > > God Bless and take care. Doug Haney> EnviroHealth Research & Consulting, Inc.> Email: _Haney52@...> > > > @...: tigerpaw2c@...: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 03:08:40 +0000Subject: [] Re: EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW, 2007> > > > > Doug,Thank you very much for this post. It is one of the best I have even seen on explaining the Ig panels. Very informative and easy to understand. Now if we can only get the rest of our physicians to grasp this information we would all be better off. KC---> _________________________________________________________________ i’m is proud to present Cause Effect, a series about real people making a difference. http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/MTV/?source=text_Cause_Effect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 Dr. Thrasher: You are absolutely right about the dedicated service and accomplishments of Sharon Kramer, and I am deeply appreciative of her contributions and her valued friendship. To this respect, I do not believe there is a big enough frame to hold all of the commendations this lady deserves, and not enough words in the dictionary to cover all that she has done for victims of unhealthy environmental exposures. You know, sort of how I feel about you, Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, Dr. Gray, Dr. Vojdani, and Dr. Lipsey, among the many. One person who is not here, but who gave his patients his ultimate best was Dr. Marinkovich. His loss has created a void as well as a setback for all of us that will never be fully refilled. Personally speaking, I owe my life to his medical dedication. As for the MDF-500 product, I have personally used the fog application in my home. and I both have acute chemical sensitivity and have experienced nothing with its use. I have either applied this product or monitored its application in several homes, offices, and one surgical center and as yet, have never had one complaint from anyone as to any adverse reactions. On the contrary, I have had nothing but complete satisfaction. In California, which has the most stringent EPA regulations in the Country, this product after over one year of investigation and testing was given registration for use in indoor environments. However, knowing of the general chemical components and how they are used, I was unaware of any adverse levels of petroleum based activity within the product. I am going to speak directly with Dr. Mark D. Tucker the primary scientist who invented it, and get his take on your valid concerns. I will tell you, that I have only observed excellent results in the use of this product, but I am no longer involved with its application at present. My direct work with this product has been primarily in a study of its overall effectiveness, and I am greatly impressed. However, when you are concerned, due to the fact that I value your vast experience and overwhelming knowledge base, I am concerned as well. I am pleased to hear that your health concerns related to your leg have improved, but to this regard, you are not that old in my book. However, shall I now refer to you as my " old " friend? Just a bit of humor in the New Year, which I wish you the best of. Take care. With warmest regard, Doug Haney @...: toxicologist1@...: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:05:14 +0000Subject: [] Re: EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW, 2007 Doug: I did not mean to imply that we did not accomplish our goal. I only meant to point out that Sharon Kramer has done outstanding work in this area, particularly with the ongoing GA0 investigation. She is to be commended.I am surprised that you are not aware of the chemical compopsition of MDF 500. There is at least three products with this registration. One is known to release copious amounts of ammonia. However, all are petroleum based. I do not recommend their use, partcularly where an individual has chemical hypersensitivity. When it comes to this illness some people are highly sensitive. The manufacturer and registrar of these products do not warn regarding the issue of chemical hypersensitivity. You may have used it successfully, but in my experience many will not, particularly with respect to the diesel fuel rating of these products. Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D.P.S. My left leg injury has pretty well healed. It has taken its time to heal. I had a severe muscle pull in the left gastrocnemius muscle that probably will never be 100% at my age.>> KC: Hope yours and all who visit and appreciate the " Sickbuildings " board have a very happy New Year. Thank you so very much for your comments. A couple years ago I made some promises that we would have some major developments wherein mold exposures and illness are concerned. I believed then that this news would arise from the massive mold exposure problems that Air Traffic Controllers are continuing to face in Control Towers across the nation (which the FAA has all but put on its very low priority list). I was one of four original consulting experts on environmental health that had been contacted for this arbitration/litigation process. I chose to depart from that process, mainly due to the " snail pace " of the case. When a team we organized to visit Washington DC in April 2007 to speak with members of the Senate and Congress, the president of the Detroit Metro Air Traffic Controller's Association chapter accompanied us. Others who dedicated their time and own expenses to make the trip and contribute greatly were Dr. Jack Thrasher (Expert Toxicologist, exp., environmental fungi and health), Dr. Dennis Hooper (Medical Mycology/Genetic Researcher), Ms. Cheryl Bossio, Esq. (expert plaintiff's attorney greatly experienced in litigating mold exposure health-related cases), Overton, Esq. (who also is experienced with mold and health litigation). These people have been working hard either behind the scenes or publicly to bring about greatly needed change. My thought then was that 2007 was going to be a positive-explosive year for mold exposure victims. This visit WAS successful in its own right, and Sharon Kramer's work to this regard has been nothing less than exceptional, given the pressures and fiscal issues facing her in her own litigation matter, but what has happened in reality with all of our efforts in 2007, is that what we have accomplished as set up 2008 as a banner year for mold victims. In January several things will start to happen to demonstrate clearly what I am telling you now. Look for news coming out of Sacramento, California concerning this topic. And, remember all throughout 2008, that you heard it here on " Sickbuildings " first. Sometime between January 7-11, I will write " THE " post that I have been waiting to write for over 11-years, AND I will guarantee that we will have some delightful fun with all of those " naysayers " who have expressed the views/writings that " mold exposures are not harmful. " > > God Bless and take care. Doug Haney> EnviroHealth Research & Consulting, Inc.> Email: _Haney52@> > > > @: tigerpaw2c@: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 03:08:40 +0000Subject: [] Re: EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW, 2007> > > > > Doug,Thank you very much for this post. It is one of the best I have even seen on explaining the Ig panels. Very informative and easy to understand. Now if we can only get the rest of our physicians to grasp this information we would all be better off. KC---> > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________> i'm is proud to present Cause Effect, a series about real people making a difference.> http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/MTV/?source=text_Cause_Effect> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]> _________________________________________________________________ i’m is proud to present Cause Effect, a series about real people making a difference. http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/MTV/?source=text_Cause_Effect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.