Guest guest Posted January 13, 2008 Report Share Posted January 13, 2008 We all, as well as the EPA, as stated here, know that physical removal is best. But, as we know, many people often won't take that advice. Its my understanding from reading this that this scrubbing with borax, etc, is whats suggested in the not unusual worst-case scenario when the owner is too cheap to remove the sheetrock. But if stachy is found on the front, stachy which requires high humidity to grow, what is on the back? There is a need to know. There is a need to remove that sheetrock to replace it, but also to find out whats on the back. The back has probably been just as wet as the front if not wetter. I really don't like the fact that they are giving the benefit of the doubt to people to make this decision in this dangerous and financially-skewed situation, but its also probably unrealistic for us to think that in the current political environment we could hope for laws that would require replacement either. Whats growing on the back, unseen? What if the building where this was done was a home or workplace? I think they published this in an attempt to address 'what is the best soap-and-scrubbing like method' to physically remove stachybotrys from porous materials as a prelude to rinsing it away and then following with water. Stachy sheetrock needs to be removed. What you don't know, CAN hurt you. (Often there is much more mold on the back than on the front) what do other people think? I don't think borax is a good alternative to removal in either homes or workplaces. But there are uses for this knowledge. ____cut here____ Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2007 Nov;14(7):523-8. Testing antimicrobial cleaner efficacy on gypsum wallboard contaminated with Stachybotrys chartarum. Menetrez MY, Foarde KK, Webber TD, Dean TR, Betancourt DA. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA. menetrez.marc@... GOAL, SCOPE AND BACKGROUND: Reducing occupant exposure to indoor mold is the goal of this research, through the efficacy testing of antimicrobial cleaners. Often mold contaminated building materials are not properly removed, but instead surface cleaners are applied in an attempt to alleviate the problem. The efficacy of antimicrobial cleaners to remove, eliminate or control mold growth on surfaces can easily be tested on non-porous surfaces. However, the testing of antimicrobial cleaner efficacy on porous surfaces, such as those found in the indoor environment such as gypsum board can be more complicated and prone to incorrect conclusions regarding residual organisms. The mold Stachybotrys chartarum has been found to be associated with idiopathic pulmonary hemorrhage in infants and has been studied for toxin production and its occurrence in water damaged buildings. Growth of S. chartarum on building materials such as gypsum wallboard has been frequently documented. METHODS: Research to control S. chartarum growth using 13 separate antimicrobial cleaners on contaminated gypsum wallboard has been performed in laboratory testing. Popular brands of cleaning products were tested by following directions printed on the product packaging. RESULTS: A variety of gypsum wallboard surfaces were used to test these cleaning products at high relative humidity. The results indicate differences in antimicrobial efficacy for the six month period of testing. DISCUSSION: Results for the six types of GWB surfaces varied extensively. However, three cleaning products exhibited significantly better results than others. Lysol All-Purpose Cleaner-Orange Breeze (full strength) demonstrated results which ranked among the best in five of the six surfaces tested. Both Borax and Orange Glo Multipurpose Degreaser demonstrated results which ranked among the best in four of the six surfaces tested. CONCLUSIONS: The best antimicrobial cleaner to choose is often dependent on the type of surface to be cleaned of S. chartarum contamination. For Plain GWB, no paint, the best cleaners were Borax, Lysol All-Purpose Cleaner-Orange Breeze (full strength), Orange Glo Multipurpose Degreaser, and Fantastik Orange Action. RECOMMENDATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES: These results are not meant to endorse the incomplete removal of mold contaminated building materials. However, it is recognized that complete removal may not always be possible and solutions to control mold regrowth may contribute to reduced occupant exposure. *Current recommendations of removal and replacement of porous building materials should be followed*. *It is not the intension of this discussion to endorse any product. Reporting on the performance of these products under the stated conditions was and remains the only purpose.* PMID: 18062486 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.