Guest guest Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 Dr Thrasher, Thank you for the pointer! Górny RL - I had never heard of his work until now. A lot of his full papers ave available for download. This fills in a blank area for me.. http://www.aaem.pl/pdf/aaem9907.htm Ann Agric Environ Med 1999, 6, 45-51 APPLICATION OF THE CLASSIC LIMULUS TEST AND THE QUANTITATIVE KINETIC CHROMOGENIC LAL METHOD FOR EVALUATION OF ENDOTOXIN CONCENTRATION IN INDOOR AIR Rafał L. Górny1, Jeroen Douwes2, Pieter Versloot2, Dick Heederik2, Jacek Dutkiewicz3 1Department of Indoor Exposure Assessment, Institute of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, Sosnowiec, Poland 2Environmental and Occupational Health Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands 3Department of Occupational Biohazards, Institute of Agricultural Medicine, Lublin, Poland Full text available in Adobe Acrobat format.Full text available in Adobe Acrobat Format AAEM Home Page Górny RL, Douwes J, Versloot P, Heederik D, Dutkiewicz J: Application of the classic Limulus test and the quantitative kinetic chromogenic LAL method for evaluation of endotoxin concentration in indoor air. Ann Agric Environ Med 1999, 6, 45-51. Abstract: The classic (gel-clot procedure) Limulus test (CLT) and the quantitative kinetic chromogenic LAL method (KQCL) used for the evaluation of bacterial endotoxin concentration in the indoor air of dwellings were compared. The scientific procedure included analyses of 40 air samples supplemented by the analysis of 20 sample duplicates (selected at random) which were taken during the fall season from 10 flats located in 3 towns of the Upper Silesian region (southern Poland). The particulate aerosol probes were sampled by Harvard impactor and Casella sampler. The same samples were analyzed in the Netherlands using the quantitative kinetic chromogenic LAL method, and in Poland using the classic Limulus test. Comparison of both methods revealed that the quantitative kinetic chromogenic LAL method was more precise, with better reproducibility (the coefficient of variation between analyses of the main probe and its duplicate was over two times smaller in the KQCL method than in the CLT method), fully automated in the phase of analysis and data reading, and faster and more effective than the classic Limulus test. Nevertheless, on the basis of the obtained results, the usefulness of the classic Limulus method for assessment of the degree of pollution of indoor air with bacterial endotoxin seems to be confirmed as in the majority of examined samples (21 out 40) the results obtained by both methods were of the same order of magnitude, and in the remaining 19 samples did exceed one order of magnitude. Thus, the data received by means of the classic Limulus test may be regarded as acceptable. Address for correspondence: Rafał L. Górny, PhD, Department of Indoor Exposure Assessment, Institute of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, Kościelna 13, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland. E-mail: r-gorny@... Key words: endotoxin, classic Limulus test, quantitative kinetic chromogenic LAL method, indoor air, dwellings. also http://www.aaem.pl/pdf/aaem9915.htm Ann Agric Environ Med 1999, 6, 105-113 SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF BACTERIAL AND FUNGAL BIOAEROSOLS IN INDOOR AIR Rafal L. Gorny1, Jacek Dutkiewicz2, Ewa Krysinska-Traczyk2 1Department of Indoor Exposure Assessment, Institute of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, Sosnowiec, Poland 2Department of Occupational Biohazards, Institute of Agricultural Medicine, Lublin, Poland Full text available in Adobe Acrobat format.Full text available in Adobe Acrobat Format AAEM Home Page Gorny RL, Dutkiewicz J, Krysinska-Traczyk E: Size distribution of bacterial and fungal bioaerosols in indoor air. Ann Agric Environ Med 1999, 6, 105-113. Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine the size distribution of bacteria and fungi occurring in the air of human dwellings. The concentration and size distribution of particulate aerosol, Gram-positive mesophilic bacteria, Gram-negative mesophilic bacteria and fungi were examined in 60 flats situated in the Upper Silesia conurbation, southern Poland. The investigated flats comprised three quantitatively equal (20 flats each) groups: flats without additional emission sources of particulate aerosol and microorganisms (Group I), flats with persons who smoke at least one packet of cigarettes per day (Group II), and flats located near steelworks (Group III). The concentrations of four fractions of particulate aerosol were measured by Harvard impactors (PM 2.5 and PM 10) as well as by cyclone HD and 37 mm filter disc holder (PM 5 and TSP). The concentrations of bacteria and fungi were measured by a particle-sizing six-stage Graseby-Andersen impactor. It was found that the concentrations of particulate aerosol in examined flats were below 0.6 mg/m3 and the concentrations of microorganisms were below the level of 104 cfu/m3. The dominant bacteria present in the air of examined dwellings (Micrococcus/Kocuria spp., Staphylococcus spp., Bacillus spp., Pseudomonadaceae, Aeromonas spp., Nocardia spp.) occurred mostly as single particles in the dwellings without additional emission sources, while in the air of dwellings inhabited by tobacco smokers, they often formed aggregates composed of bacterial and dust particles. The fungi dominant in the air of examined dwellings (Penicillium spp., Aspergillus spp., yeasts) occurred mostly as single particles. Address for correspondence: Rafal L. Gorny, Ph.D., Department of Indoor Exposure Assessment, Institute of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, Koscielna 13, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland. E-mail: r-gorny@... Key words: indoor air, bacteria, fungi, size distribution, particulate aerosol. Ann Agric Environ Med 2004, 11, 185-197 FILAMENTOUS MICROORGANISMS AND THEIR FRAGMENTS IN INDOOR AIR - A REVIEW Rafal L. Gorny Department of Biohazards, Institute of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, Sosnowiec, Poland Full text available in Adobe Acrobat format.Full text available in Adobe Acrobat Format AAEM Home Page Gorny RL: Filamentous microorganisms and their fragments in indoor air - a review. Ann Agric Environ Med 2004, 11, 185-197. Abstract: The paper summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding the role of filamentous microorganisms (i.e., fungi and actinomycetes) and their submicrometer propagules (fragments) in formation of indoor bioaerosol. It discusses the importance of water damages in buildings and the role of humidity as a cause of fungal and actinomycetal contamination and subsequent deterioration of indoor spaces. The importance of the size of airborne microbial propagules for adverse health effects is broadly commented as well. Regarding the microbial fragments, the method of their release from the contaminated surfaces (including factors influencing their aerosolization, i.e., air velocity, colony structure, moisture conditions, vibration of the surface, time factor), modern measurement techniques and newly obtained results of the immunological reactivity of fragments are discussed. The novel ideas concerning the dynamic description of the release process of microbial propagules from their sources are also presented. Address for correspondence: Dr Rafal L. Gorny, Department of Biohazards, Institute of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, Koscielna 13, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland. E-mail: r.gorny@... Key words: indoor air quality, moisture, building materials, biodeterioration, fungi, actinomycetes, fragments, release mechanisms, immunological reactivity. On Jan 2, 2008 8:40 PM, Jack Thrasher, Ph.D. <toxicologist1@...> wrote: > > > > > > > Dr. Kong'u is quite correct. The other aspect that mold cultures do not > examine is the fine particulate matter (less than the size of hyphae and > spores). The studies in Poland by Gorny and those in the U.S by Brael and > Straus clearly demonsrate that the fine particulates contain many toxic > compounds, including mycotoxins. If you are going to do air sampling, then > also consider the fine (nanoparticulates) in the sampling protocol. > > Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D. > Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist > www.drthrasher.org > toxicologist1@... > Off: 775-636-8513 > Cell - 505-937-1150 > Fax - 775-636-7403 > > L. Crawley, M.ED., LADC > Trauma Specialist > sandracrawley@... > 530-644-6035 - Off > 775-309-3994 - Cell > > This message and any attachments forwarded with it is to be considered > privileged and confidential. The forwarding or redistribution of this > message (and any attachments) without my prior written consent is strictly > prohibited and may violate privacy laws. Once the intended purpose of this > message has been served, please destroy the original message contents. If > you have received this message in error, please reply immediately to advise > the sender of the miscommunication and then delete the message and any > copies you have printed. Thank you in advance for your compliance. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.