Guest guest Posted August 7, 2012 Report Share Posted August 7, 2012 Is AS a gift or a curse? Few topics seem to be as controversial in the neurodiversity community as this question. In my experience, that question can be tame stuff. I personally find any discussion of the CADD behavioral dynamic in AS/NT relationships to be far more controversial. Of all the topics that have a tendency to stir the AS community, this one seems to get the most knees jerking. I myself have been in two long-term relationships where the CADD behavioral dynamic existed. I don't much care whether the syndrome has been officially blessed by the DSM or not. I've experienced the emotions from both sides of the fence, and know that AS is not a requirement for the phenomenon to be present. This article is not new, yet it's new to me. If you are interested in CADD, you may want to take a look. What I especially like about this article is that it stresses the role that *both* parties play in the development and treatment of this destructive relationship dynamic. Excerpt: " Unfortunately, Maxine Aston’s earlier development of the concept was misconstrued by AS/autism advocates to mean that AS-individuals caused individual psychiatric disorders in loved ones, independent of the loved one’s contribution to the relational interaction. Some AS/autism advocates have interpreted these earlier concepts as blaming the partner with the neuro-developmental difference for harming the non-AS partner who is perceived as being blameless. In their view, the term reflects a prejudice against those with such differences; however, this perspective does not acknowledge the very real deficits which exist and must be addressed. Aston later broadened the diagnostic scope and applicability from CADD which applied to AS to include all relational disorders in which low emotional intelligence (EI) or alexithymia contributed to the relational dysfunction, labelling these conditions Affective Deprivation Disorder (AfDD). Affective Deprivation Disorder results from a relationship in which emotional needs are chronically unmet creating a sense of emotional deprivation. This in no way should be taken to mean that either partner is actively or deliberately depriving the other. The deprivation is created by the fact that the partners are emotionally out of sync and it is overly simplistic to say that one partner causes the deprivation of the other. Instead, the reality is that each partner may contribute to the dysfunction in different degrees. While the relational difficulties may have originated from one partner’s emotional constraints, the other partner’s reaction may exacerbate the tension leading to defensiveness and creating a spiralling effect. For instance, the non-alexithymic partner’s reactivity can affect the alexithymic individual potentially creating anxiety attacks, anger, or distressing physical symptoms just as the alexithymic individual has been shown to impact the non-alexithymic partner. " more... Affective Deprivation Disorder: Does it Constitute a Relational Disorder? http://affectivedeprivation.blogspot.com/ Enjoy (or not), ~CJ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ No matter how many mistakes you make or how slow you progress, you are still way ahead of everyone who isn't trying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.