Guest guest Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 Well, as long as the subject of this email doesn't mind it... Personally, I surely wouldn't like to encourage personal pokes. Ravin '82 > ** > > > There was a Meena. Then she transformed into MADHULILA (the capitals are > not mine). However, she still has some Meena left inside her. That explains > the use of parenthesis. The parenthetical Meena is smaller than MADHULILA . > Perhaps it proves that MADHULILA is growing and Meena is gradually getting > assimilated into the new form. It is confusing. If Meena has become > Madhulila, she should stop being Meena. She cannot be two persons. Nobody > can be. > > I am in a mood for some bakwas. Anyone keen to join in. > > Bharat > > PS: If MADHULILA (Meena) does not see any point in it, I apologise to her. > > ________________________________ > > To: " mgims " <mgims > > Sent: Friday, 6 July 2012 4:04 PM > Subject: Happy birthday- TarlikaParmar > > > > Dear Tarlika, > > Many many happy returns of the day > > God Bless > > MADHULILA ( Meena) 1980 > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 You must ask Amulya about MPDs Kishore Shah 1974 -------------------------------------------------- Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 5:00 PM To: <mgims > Subject: Bakwas > There was a Meena. Then she transformed into MADHULILA (the capitals are > not mine). However, she still has some Meena left inside her. That > explains the use of parenthesis. The parenthetical Meena is smaller than > MADHULILA . Perhaps it proves that MADHULILA is growing and Meena is > gradually getting assimilated into the new form. It is confusing. If Meena > has become Madhulila, she should stop being Meena. She cannot be two > persons. Nobody can be. > > I am in a mood for some bakwas. Anyone keen to join in. > > Bharat > > PS: If MADHULILA (Meena) does not see any point in it, I apologise to her. > > > ________________________________ > > To: " mgims " <mgims > > Sent: Friday, 6 July 2012 4:04 PM > Subject: Happy birthday- TarlikaParmar > > > > Dear Tarlika, > > Many many happy returns of the day > > God Bless > > MADHULILA ( Meena) 1980 > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 Dear Bharat Have fun with your bakwas Have a great day and a great life MADHULILA (Meena) 1980 > There was a Meena. Then she transformed into MADHULILA (the capitals are not mine). However, she still has some Meena left inside her. That explains the use of parenthesis. The parenthetical Meena is smaller than MADHULILA . Perhaps it proves that MADHULILA is growing and Meena is gradually getting assimilated into the new form. It is confusing. If Meena has become Madhulila, she should stop being Meena. She cannot be two persons. Nobody can be. > > I am in a mood for some bakwas. Anyone keen to join in. > > Bharat > > PS: If MADHULILA (Meena) does not see any point in it, I apologise to her. > > ________________________________ > > To: " mgims " <mgims > > Sent: Friday, 6 July 2012 4:04 PM > Subject: Happy birthday- TarlikaParmar > > > > Dear Tarlika, > > Many many happy returns of the day > > God Bless > > MADHULILA ( Meena) 1980 > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 I always believe in having an honorable intent. It is definitely not a joke on 'her'. It just gave me an idea. You can call it a flight of ideas. However, the postscript should not be ignored. Do I give anybody ideas? Hardly anyone knows me, but I would like to know how much you know about me even when you hardly know me. Any takers? I have already announced I am in a mood for some bakwas today. Bharat ________________________________ To: mgims Sent: Friday, 6 July 2012 6:44 PM Subject: Re: Bakwas Well, as long as the subject of this email doesn't mind it... Personally, I surely wouldn't like to encourage personal pokes. Ravin '82 > ** > > > There was a Meena. Then she transformed into MADHULILA (the capitals are > not mine). However, she still has some Meena left inside her. That explains > the use of parenthesis. The parenthetical Meena is smaller than MADHULILA . > Perhaps it proves that MADHULILA is growing and Meena is gradually getting > assimilated into the new form. It is confusing. If Meena has become > Madhulila, she should stop being Meena. She cannot be two persons. Nobody > can be. > > I am in a mood for some bakwas. Anyone keen to join in. > > Bharat > > PS: If MADHULILA (Meena) does not see any point in it, I apologise to her. > > ________________________________ > > To: " mgims " <mgims > > Sent: Friday, 6 July 2012 4:04 PM > Subject: Happy birthday- TarlikaParmar > > > > Dear Tarlika, > > Many many happy returns of the day > > God Bless > > MADHULILA ( Meena) 1980 > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 I know what he knows. I also know what you know. Bharat ________________________________ To: mgims Sent: Friday, 6 July 2012 9:09 PM Subject: Re: Bakwas  You must ask Amulya about MPDs Kishore Shah 1974 -------------------------------------------------- Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 5:00 PM To: <mgims > Subject: Bakwas > There was a Meena. Then she transformed into MADHULILA (the capitals are > not mine). However, she still has some Meena left inside her. That > explains the use of parenthesis. The parenthetical Meena is smaller than > MADHULILA . Perhaps it proves that MADHULILA is growing and Meena is > gradually getting assimilated into the new form. It is confusing. If Meena > has become Madhulila, she should stop being Meena. She cannot be two > persons. Nobody can be. > > I am in a mood for some bakwas. Anyone keen to join in. > > Bharat > > PS: If MADHULILA (Meena) does not see any point in it, I apologise to her. > > > ________________________________ > > To: " mgims " <mgims > > Sent: Friday, 6 July 2012 4:04 PM > Subject: Happy birthday- TarlikaParmar > > > > Dear Tarlika, > > Many many happy returns of the day > > God Bless > > MADHULILA ( Meena) 1980 > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2012 Report Share Posted July 7, 2012 That is very sporting of you, Madulila (Meena) :-) Ravin '82 > ** > > > Dear Bharat > Have fun with your bakwas > Have a great day and a great life > > MADHULILA (Meena) 1980 > > > > > > There was a Meena. Then she transformed into MADHULILA (the capitals are > not mine). However, she still has some Meena left inside her. That explains > the use of parenthesis. The parenthetical Meena is smaller than MADHULILA . > Perhaps it proves that MADHULILA is growing and Meena is gradually getting > assimilated into the new form. It is confusing. If Meena has become > Madhulila, she should stop being Meena. She cannot be two persons. Nobody > can be. > > > > I am in a mood for some bakwas. Anyone keen to join in. > > > > Bharat > > > > PS: If MADHULILA (Meena) does not see any point in it, I apologise to > her. > > > > ________________________________ > > > > To: " mgims " <mgims > > > Sent: Friday, 6 July 2012 4:04 PM > > Subject: Happy birthday- TarlikaParmar > > > > > > > > Dear Tarlika, > > > > Many many happy returns of the day > > > > God Bless > > > > MADHULILA ( Meena) 1980 > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.