Guest guest Posted March 9, 2008 Report Share Posted March 9, 2008 Interesting that smoking seemingly protects from this disease. Sarcoidosis http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/496208 Dec. 17, 2004 � A case-control study published in the Dec. 15 issue of the American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine suggests environmental and occupational risk factors for sarcoidosis. " The prevailing view suggests that sarcoidosis occurs as the consequence of exposure to one or more environmental agents interacting with genetic factors, " write Lee S. Newman, MD, MA, from the National Jewish Medical and Research Center and University of Colorado Health Sciences Center in Denver, Colorado, and colleagues. " Previous investigators have suggested that environmental exposures to microbial agents may prove causative because of their infectious and/or antigenic properties. " At 10 centers, the investigators recruited and interviewed 706 patients newly diagnosed as having sarcoidosis and an equal number of age-, race-, and sex-matched control subjects, using questionnaires regarding occupational and nonoccupational exposures. Univariable analyses demonstrated positive associations between sarcoidosis and agricultural employment (odds ratio [OR], 1.46; confidence interval [CI], 1.13-1.89), work exposure to insecticides (OR, 1.52; CI, 1.14-2.04), and work environment containing mold or mildew with possible exposure to microbial bioaerosols (OR, 1.61; CI, 1.13-2.31). Compared with control subjects, those with sarcoidosis were less likely to have a history of ever smoking cigarettes (OR, 0.62; CI, 0.50-0.77). Multivariable modeling suggested increased sarcoidosis risk for work in areas with musty odors (OR, 1.62; CI, 1.24-2.11) and for occupational exposure to insecticides (OR, 1.61; CI, 1.13- 2.28), and a decreased OR related to ever smoking cigarettes (OR, 0.65; CI, 0.51-0.82). " The study did not identify a single, predominant cause of sarcoidosis, " the authors write. " We identified several exposures associated with sarcoidosis risk, including insecticides, agricultural employment, and microbial bioaerosols. " Study limitations include potentially missing risk factors not considered in questionnaire design, the possibility that some of the statistically significant results may have occurred due to chance alone, possible ascertainment bias, failure of many potential control subjects to participate in the study, differential information bias, and recall bias. " Sarcoidosis is considered to be a hypersensitivity disorder, in which an antigen induces a T cell-mediated cellular immune response. As a result, it is possible that the etiologic agent or agents may initiate disease at very low doses of exposure, " the authors conclude. " Efforts should be directed at integrating exposure data with our emerging understanding of other sarcoidosis risk modifiers such as tobacco use, genetics, and familial aggregation. " Two of the authors report a financial relationship with Centocor. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170:1324-1330 Learning Objectives for This Educational Activity Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to: * Identify the differential diagnosis of sarcoidosis based on clinical and pathologic features. * Describe environmental and occupational exposures that can increase the risk of developing sarcoidosis. Clinical Context Sarcoidosis is thought to be the result of an antigen-specific cell- mediated immune response, and the authors of the current study note that sarcoidosis can be difficult to distinguish in terms of clinical and histologic clues from other disease states associated with antigen exposure. These antigen-related disorders include chronic beryllium disease, hypersensitivity pneumonitis due to inhaled antigens, and fungal and mycobacterial antigen-induced granulomatous lung disease. An increased risk of sarcoidosis has been associated with those working in multiple occupations, including firefighting and health care, and environmental exposures to mold or agricultural products. Because the significance of these possible risk factors remains controversial, the authors of the current study performed a multicenter case-control examination of patients with sarcoidosis. Study Highlights * Ten centers participated in the study. Subjects with sarcoidosis were included if they had tissue confirmation of noncaseating granulomas on biopsy within 6 months of study enrollment, clinical signs and symptoms of sarcoidosis, and if they were older than 18 years. Subjects with tuberculosis were excluded, as were most patients with a history of beryllium exposure. * Control subjects were recruited by randomized dialing of telephone numbers. * All participants received questionnaires regarding specific jobs, hobbies, and exposures at home and work. They were interviewed regarding all jobs held within the previous 6 months, and smoking status was ascertained. * 736 patients with sarcoidosis were recruited into the study, and they were compared with 706 controls. 64% of cases were women, and 53% of all subjects were white. 44% of participants were black. The median age of cases was 42.1 years. * On univariable analysis, occupations associated with an increased risk of sarcoidosis included agricultural employment, physician, jobs involving raising birds, automotive manufacturing, and middle and secondary school teacher. * Exposures more frequently associated with sarcoidosis included insecticides, pesticides, mold and mildew, and musty odors. All of these exposures were related to the subject's occupation, but the use of home central air conditioning was also associated with an increased risk of sarcoidosis. * Location in urban vs rural areas did not affect the risk of sarcoidosis, and other health care workers besides physicians did not have an increased risk of disease. * A reduced risk of sarcoidosis was associated with either active or passive smoking, and subjects with occupations that limited exposure to other people, such as motor vehicle operator or computer programmer, were also at reduced risk of sarcoidosis. * Multivariable analysis confirmed most of the univariable conclusions of the study. In the multivariable model, the occupation of physician was no longer associated with an increased risk of sarcoidosis. * The authors did not confirm previous reports of an increased risk of sarcoidosis related to exposure to wood dust, metals, silica, or talc. They also did not demonstrate that employment as a firefighter or in the U.S. Navy was associated with sarcoidosis, although the researchers note that their study may not have been adequately powered to appropriately analyze these possible risk factors. Pearls for Practice * Sarcoidosis can be mistaken on clinical and pathologic findings for exposure diseases such as hypersensitivity pneumonitis, chronic beryllium disease, and mycobacterial and fungal granulomatous disease. * The current study found an increased risk of sarcoidosis associated with agricultural employment and exposure to pesticides, but smoking conferred protection against the development of sarcoidosis. Post Test 1. Which of the following is least likely to be part of the differential diagnosis of a patient with pulmonary sarcoidosis who has undergone a lung biopsy? a. Chronic beryllium disease b. Fungal granulomatous disease c. Mycobacterial granulomatous disease d. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis e. Mesothelioma 2. Which of the following risk factors was not associated with a higher risk of sarcoidosis in the current study by Newman and colleagues? a. Agricultural employment b. Smoking c. Employment in automotive manufacturing d. Pesticide exposure e. Mold exposure About News CME News CME is designed to keep physicians abreast of current research and related clinical developments that are likely to affect practice, as reported by the Medscape Medical News group. Send comments or questions about this program to cmenews@.... Medscape Medical News 2004. © 2004 Medscape Legal Disclaimer The material presented here does not reflect the views of Medscape or the companies providing unrestricted educational grants. These materials may discuss uses and dosages for therapeutic products that have not been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. A qualified health care professional should be consulted before using any therapeutic product discussed. All readers or continuing education participants should verify all information and data before treating patients or employing any therapies described in this educational activity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2008 Report Share Posted March 9, 2008 it is pretty interesting and I have researched sarcoidosis quite a bit and have some thoughts on this. the navy has done a lot of research as they seem to deal with this disease alot. they deturmined it was caused by toxins,molds and bacterias. who would have guessed, anyway, sence I live diagnoseing myself, I have xame to some very interesting conclusions on this. I smoke. and ny exposure in my second home was so bad it fulled my lungs with mold and no dought, the distroyed mucus. I had hardly any bteathing compasity at all, however after I got out of there I started coughing up goobs of all colored mucus from my lungs and slowly regained my breathing compasity. now theres things going on infront of my lungs, swelling and pain against my rib cage,breasts, and alot of pain,burning on my back. but other than the closeing up of my airways when I get around things that cause reaction, my lungs theirself only hurt when I breath something that causes a infection or something like nemonia(spelling),maybe cold air but maybe whats in the cild air ? can hurt too. but anyway, I had read that lung infections can go straight into the cns so I thought this was what was happening but it didn't quite fit the diagnoses because these cns infections didn't just happen when my lungs hurt. so I continued lookung, and mainly because of the burning on my back side I needed to understand just what was happening there. than I went back to the cns,arachnoid, and waalaam it was right there staring me in the face and it all fit together. I now understand why my tremors happen from the waist down, because they happen from the point that the DDD and sponalcord adhesionm severe arachnoiditis was wotking it's way up my back. the butning pain on my back side above this point being part of whats going on with no dought arachnoid cysts there and the damage to the malyein sleath and because of that damage and infections and damage to the arachnoid villa,brain infection is part of that, and my cat scan report says several cysts in the frontal lobes and decreased white and gray matter. thats not all it shows but at least that was igknowledged. I also got the report from the neuro-opthamologest saying the cataracts cant be removed until other health problems are under control. hey, not bad considering what I've been up against which I cant get into at this time. anyway, I suppose that if I went to a sarcoidosis doctor, I'd probably get diagnosed with neurisarcoidosis, one of those rare cases where the lungs seemed to not be as invilved yet maybe still with phurel effusion(fluid in the lineing of the lungs and possably granulomas). --- In , " tigerpaw2c " <tigerpaw2c@...> wrote: > > Interesting that smoking seemingly protects from this disease. > > Sarcoidosis > > http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/496208 > > Dec. 17, 2004 � A case-control study published in the Dec. 15 > issue of the American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care > Medicine suggests environmental and occupational risk factors for > sarcoidosis. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.