Re: Body – Mind – Intelligence

[Guest guest]

Daddy,

It's surprising that this is coming from a biochemist. As simple as it may sound

prana is the difference between the living and nonliving. As you know we are

made of cells and the electricity etc is the result of cellular metabolism. That

is life. What keeps the cellular metabolism going is not the 'soul' but oxygen,

water and food. Ultimately it is cardiac arrest or pulmonary failure that

extinguishes the 'light'. Ultimately we owe our life to earth which is the

source of food, water and oxygen. That's why I like cremation. We come from

earth and we should go back to earth.

Respectfully the philosophers you quote are from an era when science had not yet

elucidated the 'life' processes.

How did life start ? The scientific community is working on that. The day is not

far when they will create life in a test tube. It is a scary thought, but then

that is what progress is about.

Ashok

Sent from my iPad

On May 17, 2012, at 1:09 AM, " Dr. Bhaskar C. Harinath "

wrote:

> Dear Ashok,

>

> Physical Science is half baked and comes to conclusions & theories

based on what you know today. When you get more information, one goes on

revising the theories. One example is Darwin’s theory of evolution. Forwarded

is the news item related to it.

>

> Regarding Body-Mind-Intelligence, Chinmaya shows the relationship

as B – M – I (Body – Mind – Intellect). In Vipassana, mind is athma or

Soul or life force attached with attributes (Vasanas) based on the actions in

previous life. To some extent this explains the question of neurologists, why

all children are not born normal. Some are with problems at the birth and also

acquire during growth. We find people suffering with different problems, some

based on the past karma and some acquired in this life. In Vipassana meditation

if some one develops wisdom of law of impermanence and develops equanimous

attitude of treating pleasure or sorrow equally witnessing and not reacting,

then the mind is purified and gets blessed and no more rebirth they say. In

Sanatana Dharma the same can be obtained by Gnana marg, Bhakti marg, Karma marg

or Raja marg (mind control) depending on one’s emotional make up. Athma or

Prana is the life force passes through all systems of the body like electricity

in all bulbs and electrical gadgets and gives life to them. Like ear, eye etc.

brain is also one system with specific function but requires life force for

action. Hence all the attempts will be to purify life force from attached greed,

dwesh etc. for enlightenment. Tough job indeed.

>

> With Love,

>

> Daddy

>

> ---------------------------------

> YOGism: live Simple, live Spiritual and live to Serve (Seva).

> ---------------------------------

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Subject: [sadhu Sanga] Darwin Was Wrong: Why We Need to Update our Model of

Evolution

> To: " Online_Sadhu_Sanga " <online_sadhu_sangagooglegroups>

> Date: Wednesday, 16 May, 2012, 5:00 AM

>

> Dear Members:

>

> It is interesting to see that this kind of news is now reaching the legacy

news media. The Huffington Post has published articles (especially the series of

microbiologist Shapiro) that regularly challenge Darwinian evolution as

the default concept in science. Such disobedience to the evolution-industry's

hegemonic taboo has appeared in The New Atlantis (series by Steve Talbott),

Scientific American (WF Doolittle, Uprooting the Tree of LIfe), and, of course,

the rapidly increasing number of books on the subject.

>

> But the following is unique in the comprehensive scope of its direct

confrontation with the whole evolutionary-minded world view:

>

> From:

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/ellen-grace-jones/darwin-was-wrong_b_1475385.htm\

l

>

> Darwin Was Wrong: Why We Need to Update Our Model of Evolution

> by Ellen Grace --May 5, 2012

>

> This week the University of Sheffield announced results of experiments which

promulgate Darwin's 'survival of the fittest' theory. Scientists claim we humans

continue to be subject to the forces and whims of natural selection like other

species.

>

> " We have shown advances have not challenged the fact that our species is still

evolving just like all the other species 'in the wild,' " posited Dr Virpi

Lummaa, from the University of Sheffield's department of animal and plant

sciences. " It is a common misunderstanding that evolution took place a long time

ago, and that to understand ourselves we must look back to the hunter-gatherer

days of humans. "

>

> The study, however, was nebulous in terms of expressing precisely what

'evolutionary changes' they found from the church records of almost 6,000 Finns

born between 1760 and 1849.

>

> An interesting experiment and indeed correct in that we are still evolving,

however to attribute it to the n, matter-based, Darwinian model of

evolution is backward-thinking and flawed given the recent leaps and bounds in

metaphysical sciences and physical historical evidence disproving linear

evolution. The ideology we randomly mutated from ocean slime to our

knuckle-dragging neanderthal long-long lost cousins to our current incarnation

is one that's been dogmatically accepted into mainstream evolutionary hegemony

without challenge until recent years.

>

> " If you take Darwinian theory, make a 'scientific' principal out of it, put it

into political action, then you have something like Nazi Germany " states the

pioneering Dr Bruce Lipton, author of Spontaneous Evolution. Lipton believes

it's 'cooperation not competition' which are the hallmarks of most natural

orders.

>

> Speaking in context of the current human-related environmental destruction of

the planet, " Much of this is related to the concept of us having arrived here as

accident, when in fact it's the opposite, there was purpose and design in the

process. The relevance is that when we bought into the Darwinian theory we

bought into a way of life that's based on survival of the fittest, but the

actual theory of evolution is survival of those that cooperate. "

>

> But if Darwin was wrong, that beardy fella on a cloud must have made us,

right? Well, no.

>

> The latest science suggests we are intelligently designed - not by some

sentient humanistic being from on high - moreover a higher, energetic, source

intelligence. Einstein's Unified Field theory equation was completed in 2007.

The breakthrough proves everything: matter (which derives from energy, which is

what we're made from) all natural laws and processes link to one underlying,

unifying consciousness - aka, God, Source, Allah, Yaweh - pick your favourite.

>

> According to Hagelin, leading particle and quantum physicist, " Everything

that's been discovered about the universe in modern science for the last 3

centuries can be systematically derived from the Unified Field's compact

expression. The self interacting dynamics of unity at the basis of life's'

diversity. "

>

> " The space between things isn't empty, it's full " claims maverick physicist

Nassim Haramein whose groundbreaking expansion of the Unified Field theory is

changing the face of physics as we know it. " We're bathing in energy which is

the fundamental source of all creation. This was known by ancient civilisations

but was lost due to the advancements of physics. My theories are starting to

show the source of everything, all the material world, is mostly space. It's the

medium that connects all things. "

>

> Quantum physicist Amit Goswami PhD supports the existence of a God

consciousness, " The evidence for God is within us, but to see it we have to be

subtle. To live it, we have to grow. Mystics, contrary to religionists, are

always saying that reality is not two things - God and the world - but one

thing, consciousness. The problem with science has always been that most

scientists believe that science must be done within a different monastic

framework, one based on the primacy of matter. Quantum physics showed us that we

must change that myopic prejudice of scientists, otherwise we cannot comprehend

quantum physics. "

>

> The problem with the Darwinian vs Creationist altercation is because it's so

polarised. Atheists feel obliged to cling onto the Darwinian model because until

now the only answer was a religious, faith-based one which they negate. Trouble

is, in our logical, left-brain thinking society we view religious and ancient

texts as literal rather than metaphorically encoded, hence their denunciation.

For the sake of its remembrance, truth was often encrypted in fables, myths and

legends. The highly-charged, energised space between things Haramein speaks of

is what the ancients - and religious - call spirit.

>

> One explicit way in which mankind is evolving for sure is in terms of our

consciousness. From the Arab Spring, to #Occupy, to other measured dissent,

there is a huge global shift and awakening to the corrupt, control system matrix

we've been locked into for so long.

>

> The Maya, who were acute astronomers, mathematicians and scientists knew this

and their precise Long Count calendar not just tracked time, but evolution of

consciousness. The much discussed end of it being December 21st 2012. Contrary

to Hollywood fear-mongering, it doesn't connote the 'end of the world', moreover

the transition into a more enlightened, evolved age.

>

> Engineer and scientist Maurice Cotterell studied the Mayan cycles of human

evolution and discovered they corresponded remarkably with his sunspot cycles of

magnetic emissions. " Research was carried out confirming modulating magnetic

fields caused genetic mutations in developing cells in test tubes. " Begins

Cotterell. " Here we have the mechanism whereby the sun's radiation affects the

magnetic field of the earth then the magnetic field of the earth shuttles up the

genes. "

>

> Everything is energy - including us. Life is the interaction of magnetic

vibrational fields and our evolution is subject to the cosmos, not random

selection. There have been peak sunspot emissions and coronal mass ejections in

2012 so it's little surprise humankind is awakening.

>

> Unlike Darwin, the Maya, ancient Hindus and Hopi Indians recognised

evolution/time as cyclical. There is overwhelming global, physical evidence that

vast, advanced civilisations preceded us: the technology in which to create,

many of today's engineers assert we do not possess.

>

> Off the coast of Yonaguni Japan, India and Cuba there are giant sunken

megalithic sites and pyramidal structures. In Bosnia Europe's first pyramid was

discovered and dated to 10,000 years plus. Geologist Dr Schoch has

accurately dated the Sphinx to be 7-9,000BC - throwing our mainstream historical

timeline into chaos and in need of serious re-writing.

>

> Despite our spiritually-impotent, techno-worshipping race's arrogance that

we're the height of all that's ever been, we are not actually the apex of human

evolution, as Darwin's linear theory would have us believe. Primordial soup was

never our ancestor. Dr Lummaa's archaic suggestion we should, " look back to the

hunter-gatherer days of humans " to understand ourselves is dangerously

reductionist. Yes the past can inform us, but by limiting our evolutionary

learning using an old-world paradigm will only hinder progress. We can waste

time searching for Darwin's 'missing link', but it will never be found.

>

>

> --

> ----------------------------

> Group Homepage: http://mahaprabhu.net/sadhusanga

>

> Download Monthly Newsletter

> The Harmonizer

> http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga/harmonizer

>

> To Contact Us or To Join Online Classes Please Visit:

http://mahaprabhu.net/OnlineClass

>

> Sadhu-Sanga MP3s: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga

>

> Submit your Paper: http://mahaprabhu.net/scsmath.siliguri/contact

>

> Donate: http://mahaprabhu.net/scsmath.siliguri/donate

> ----------------------------

>

> You received this message because you are subscribed to the " Transcendental

Nectar of Sadhu-Sanga " e-group.

> Group Subscription Details:

>

http://groups.google.co.in/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga/web/group-subscription-detai\

ls