Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

interview with DR. CROFT

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Angel, if there's something your not saying just say it. there appears

to be info. under a " william a. croft,medical pathologest "

if theres some fogginess about it, let's get it cleared up. people need

to know facts. things are hard enough.

In , ntefusa@... wrote:

>

> thrasher would be able to answert that

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I have interviews with Dr Croft on my website, its divided into 5 or 10

minute segments from WBEN near Buffalo. He spoke about body indicators

of mold invasion.

libertyschoolmold.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I know Dr Rae of Dallas used to use Dr Croft to do pathology work but

has switched to Dr Hooper, who is down in Texas near him and in the

same complex of office buildings. I know he started out in life as a

vet, but know he took further education in human pathology. Perhaps he

became interested in mold in finding fungal infection and toxic

conditions in animals and led him in this direction. I can't imagine

that dog tissue would be any different than human in respects to

succuming to toxic effects of mold, or much different. Afterall most

of all knowledge of medical science comes from studies on rats.

>

> hust wondering, does anyone know if DR. SHOEMAKER and DR. CROFT has

> worked together on any cases?

> WILLIAM A. CROFT,MEDICAL PATHOLOGEST

>

> http://str8talk.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/toxic-mold-show/

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

It IS true that Dr. Croft has a degree in veterinary medicine (DVM)

and he is not an M.D. In addition, he has a second doctorate in

Medical Pathology from University of Wisconsin, Madison, which means

that he actually has MORE experience in human pathology than most M.D.s.

I'm not sure how much the program has changed in the decades since he

earned his Ph.D. in Medical Pathology, but this link is to the program

which seems to my uneducated eye to be the current version of the

program: http://www.pathology.wisc.edu/gradprogram/mission.aspx .

You can look it up for yourself, the Mission of this program is: To

train students for careers as independent investigators and teachers

with a focus on basic cellular and molecular mechanisms of human disease.

Training in veterinary medicine means that scientists can do research

in vivo (not just in vitro) to study the animal systems most similar

to human ones since testing poisons on humans is illegal.

You'll also note that Public Law 107-188 actually elevates individuals

with his training above M.D.s who do not have this level of training

and experience with in vivo pathology with respect to declaring public

health emergencies in the case of poisoning and potential bioterrorism.

Each of these men of science, albeit Croft, Thrasher, Hooper,

Shoemaker, Kilburn, Crago, Gray, , Johanning, Markovich,

Strauss, Lipsey, Rhea or any of the other researchers in fungus and

the effects on human health, deserve our gratitude for sticking their

necks out to further the cause of getting medical treatment for those

injured. We need not try to pit one against the other with innuendo

as they have a whole host of naysayers and critics on the other side

that would love to discredit them and their research. If someone needs

the services of one of these men, TALK to them, ask them what they do

and YOU and/or your lawyer decide how their services can fit into your

situation. They don't all do the same thing but they all have gone

above & beyond to help advance the science of mold effects on human

health and for this, I am grateful for each & every one of them.

> >

> > thrasher would be able to answert that

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I second everything you said. Thanks for stating this so well. They

all are very important, and I appreciate them all.

>> Each of these men of science, albeit Croft, Thrasher, Hooper,

> Shoemaker, Kilburn, Crago, Gray, , Johanning, Markovich,

> Strauss, Lipsey, Rhea or any of the other researchers in fungus and

> the effects on human health, deserve our gratitude for sticking their

> necks out to further the cause of getting medical treatment for those

> injured. We need not try to pit one against the other with innuendo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I tried posting this before but somehow it didn't go thru but yes Dr.

Croft is a DVM and also has a PhD. Why all the confusion with what he

is? It clearly states in his speach " Pathology of Tricothecene

Mycotoxins in Man " at the 21st Annual International Symposium on The

stages of mycotoxicosis: for inhalation of mycotoxin that he is a DVM

with a PhD. Hope this clears up the confusion.

> > >

> > > thrasher would be able to answert that

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I suggest that you ask Dr. Croft what he means by vapor. Mycotoxins are not

very volatile. The odors that you detect are most likely volatile organic

compounds released by both bacteria and molds that are present in damp indoor

spaces.

Jack-Dwayne: Thrasher, Ph.D.

Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist

www.drthrasher.org

toxicologist1@...

Off: 916-745-4703

Cell: 575-937-1150

L. Crawley, M.ED., LADC

Trauma Specialist

sandracrawley@...

916-745-4703 - Off

775-309-3994 - Cell

This message and any attachments forwarded with it is to be considered

privileged and confidential. The forwarding or redistribution of this message

(and any attachments) without my prior written consent is strictly prohibited

and may violate privacy laws. Once the intended purpose of this message has been

served, please destroy the original message contents. If you have received this

message in error, please reply immediately to advise the sender of the

miscommunication and then delete the message and any copies you have printed.

Thank you in advance for your compliance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Diane,

I think someone (Dr Thrasher) already answered this. VOCs are

what would be smelled because they are " volatile, " easily

airborne. Mycotoxins are not volatile, not easily airborne. So I

don't know what Dr Croft meant by " vapors. "

Dogs smell the VOCs. When mold dogs are trained using known

molds they are being trained to respond to the microbial VOCs. I

assume there are other " smells " associated with mold spores,

hyphae and other growth components and maybe mycotoxins are

included in that list. But they would not be primary.

Carl Grimes

Healthy Habitats LLC

-----

I was wondering if any of you listened to the interview with Dr. Croft

about mycotoxicosis that posted last week. I had a question about

something he said about mycotoxins being a " vapor. " I have always said

that I could smell the toxins in my home and on my body and was told

that mycotoxins had no smell. My golden retreiver could actually detect

the same smell on my hands. (I can too) May I ask, what is Dr. Croft

referring to when he is talking about the " vapor " and mycotoxins?

Anyone? Thanking you in advance. Diane Bolton

----------

The following section of this message contains a file attachment

prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.

If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any other MIME-compliant system,

you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer.

If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance.

---- File information -----------

File: DEFAULT.BMP

Date: 16 Jun 2009, 0:10

Size: 358 bytes.

Type: Unknown

Link to comment
Share on other sites

---

Thank you to both of you for answering. Diane

In , " Carl E. Grimes " <grimes@...> wrote:

>

> Diane,

>

> I think someone (Dr Thrasher) already answered this. VOCs are

> what would be smelled because they are " volatile, " easily

> airborne. Mycotoxins are not volatile, not easily airborne. So I

> don't know what Dr Croft meant by " vapors. "

>

> Dogs smell the VOCs. When mold dogs are trained using known

> molds they are being trained to respond to the microbial VOCs. I

> assume there are other " smells " associated with mold spores,

> hyphae and other growth components and maybe mycotoxins are

> included in that list. But they would not be primary.

>

> Carl Grimes

> Healthy Habitats LLC

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...