Guest guest Posted May 17, 2008 Report Share Posted May 17, 2008 Joe, The wording, " These findings extend the conclusions of insufficient evidence, " which appears at the conclusion of the study, are clumsy and ambiguous. When I first read it I interpreted it the same as you. But in the context of the full paragraph it seems to mean something different, that the conclusions go beyond (extend) the insufficient evidence and justifies more research. If the evidence supported the denial of asthma from mold exposure I doubt they would suggest further study. So which is true? The conclusion statement in the Abstact has different wording and is quite clear (thanks for including http://tinyurl.com/4fro2x ): Conclusions. Our findings extend the 2004 conclusions of the Institute of Medicine ... by showing that mold levels in dust were associated with new-onset asthma in this damp indoor environment. Hydrophilic fungi and ergosterol as measures of fungal biomass may have promise as markers of risk of building-related respiratory diseases in damp indoor environments. Interpreting studies can be as difficult as dissecting marketing claims. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC ----- > National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) continues to find " insufficient evidence " to link indoor mold in " water-damaged [office] building " to asthma. [Toxic Mold? What's toxic mold?] These tax-dollar-financed bozos are definitely on the fast-track (sarcasm), to " discover " what we ALL know to be true about the cause of our suffering. They confirmed their own 2004 study, but discovered a really " neat " new measuring tool, for mold, to allow them to come to the same stupid conclusion they reached in their 2004 study. Way to go guys! (sarcasm) > > Joe > .................................................................................\ ........... > (This is the last paragraph of their study) > > In conclusion, we showed that among employees in a building with a long history of water damage, respiratory symptoms and post-occupancy asthma were strongly associated with fungi in a linear exposure-response manner, especially the levels of hydrophilic fungi (including yeasts) in dust. These findings extend the conclusions of insufficient evidence for the development of asthma in relation to the presence of mold or other agents in damp indoor environments reported by the Institute of Medicine (2004). Because the markers (totl culturable fungi, hydrophilic fungi, and ergosterol) of potential mold exposure were associated with health outcomes, we suggest that further research to understand respiratory health effects in water-damaged indoor environments include measurements of both ergosterol and speciated culturable fungi in dust. > > > For Complete Study, Click this link: > http://tinyurl.com/4fro2x > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.