Guest guest Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 Find out the basis for the protocol: EPA, NYC Guidelines, S520. It should reference something other than their personal preference. Interpretation of the lab data is essential. HOW it will be interpreted should be disclosed and discussed prior to sampling. Otherwise each side can provide their own interpretation instead of relying on objective data. If the hygenist is not trained in health and risk assessment then she is correct in not providing an opinion of whether you should move out or stay. However, if she defers to your preference then she should support your decision and not side with the builder by saying it is unnecessary. She already told you she couldn't advise you, so she should not advise the builder. I don't know of any definition of habitability other than if you stay it is habitable, if you leave it may not be habitable. Go to www.epa.gov/iaq/molds and download the free " Mold Remediation in Schools and Commercial Buildings. " Then go to page 26 item 5. You don't have to accept the builder's methods. You can conduct your own assessment with your own people. Yes, that will cost you money but if you don't then you have no way to dispute the builder's claims. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC ----- > The builder hired a hygenist who came to my home last Thursday, she > was from a different town so I'm hoping she isn't biased ot the > builder. I videoed the whole thing. She is making a protocol for > how to clean up the mess. Surprisingly she did not wear any > protection, use any fans in my house before sampling, or wear any > kind of shoe covers after stepping in the mold and then tracking it > through the rest of my home. They all act like I am freiking out > about nothing! We will have the results from the air sampling on > Monday, she told us that its a personal decision, whether or not to > stay in the home when there is mold and that she couldn't advise us > one way or the other about it. > > ------------------------------------ > > FAIR USE NOTICE: > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 , Your bulk sampling did the same thing - it identified the suspect substance as mold and what genera of mold. It could also be swabbed. Air sampling would probably be of little use here. The differences between bulk, swab and tape have mainly to do with whether or not they can be cultured. Bulk and swab can be analysed with both microscopy or culturing. Tape only by microscopy. For tape lifts, any clear tape will work, but Scotch tape (not the Magic Transparant) is thinner than packing tape. This makes it easier for the lab to analyze and it reduces identification error. The tape is pressed against the mold so the spores and hyphae stick to it. Then the tape can be stuck to a microscope slide or the inside of a clear baggie. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC ----- > Carl, regarding tape sampling: I did bulk sampling years ago in one > moldy place so I know how to do that. I wanted to know how you do the > tape sampling. I suppose you stick the sticky side of the tape on the > mold or water damage spot. What do you do with the tape just put it is > plastic bag? Thanks, > > > ------------------------------------ > > FAIR USE NOTICE: > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.