Guest guest Posted June 6, 2008 Report Share Posted June 6, 2008 Ginny, While I am pleased they are acknowledging CFS is real. There are many on this board who do not fit classic CFS, yet carry many of the symptoms. There was no need for that malingering comment in their paper. Makes me think that if one does not fit neatly into a peg hole they are designing, then these people will be deemed liars...yet again. It makes no sense that one would use that term when advancing the understanding of CFS. It's like saying if you don't have CFS, yet you are sick with unexplained symptoms, then you must be a liar. I find this study somewhat dangerous from the tone it is projecting. In a message dated 6/6/2008 1:20:58 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, ginloi@... writes: " Inspire a sudden recovery in malingers " - could mean that if there are blood typing groups that could offer " hard evidence " of M.E. - then, those who even " think " they could " pass themselves off " as sick - would know that their blood work would not show the markers... Those people certainly exist, and make everyone else vulnerable to the broad brush of criticism. " Malingerer " is a legal term of art...but a blood marker test, and those other factors like irregular heart beat and chronic low blood pressure do see like real HARD data possibilities, that sound good to me. In other words, a blood test will chase-off the malingers. **************Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch " Cooking with Tyler Florence " on AOL Food. (http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4? & NCID=aolfod00030000000002) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.