Guest guest Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 Sharon, Good luck! If they don't publish a PROMINENT retraction, then they are going to continue to look very bad, given the way they blatantly twisted every possible aspect of your story AND the mold story. Do they care about credibility? I guess we will see.. The LAWeekly hit piece on you STANDS OUT as an extreme example, Is so good that so many people spoke up for you.. You know, I know that there are lots of different viewpoints on mold, but there is also a lot that we agree about, even people who might differ about the importance of or best ways to present various issues. People who care are far better than people who don't care or worse, want to turn back the clock on knowledge. They need to be exposed. They are aggressively attacking us.. all of us.. by lying about what is happening. Which means that SO many different media outlets desperately need to be called to task for the TERRIBLE reporting jobs they are doing on environmental health issues. On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 2:34 PM, <snk1955@...> wrote: > > Dear Laurie, (Ochoa - Editor) > > Why do I have a feeling you all are going to again present me in a horrid > light with the edits tomorrow to the LAWeekly article ? Am I right? Could > be wrong. If I am, I'm sorry for being overly cautious. But this email is > just an insurance policy to show that LAWeekly has been told of what has > been going on over the mold issue..... etc.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.