Fw : chi27-6.pdf (application/pdf Object)

[Guest guest]

See if any one can follow the way I am thinking.  These are the new NY  WTC

guidelines -

First, if the medical profession can invade our colons for colon cancer

screening which makes the profession a gazillion dollars, why are they not using

the same " endoscopy " for lungs that were breathing the " dust " and debris from

the World Trade Center?

Second, Why are they treating the after effects with steroids and shrinks? 

Third, Are they afraid of what a lung-wash would show?  They are washing out

America's colons as a cancer screening, without any symptoms.  Why are they not

washing out sick lungs who have symptoms?

I find this document well worth scrutiny from everyone.  It is beyond me as a

layperson why all that asbestos, flame retardants, chemical and biotoxins are

not going to be aggressively diagnosed instead of the " band aid " approach, which

makes the pharma people rich and keep the shrink's couches warm. 

I mean no slight to those great docs in the behavioral field, but for the love

of Pete, why are there not complete immunological  blood assays/ battery being

made part of mainstream medicine.  What is it going to take to  use " best

practices "   instead of the lowest common denominator for this catastrophic

building exposure syndrome?  Are they afraid of the concrete dust particles and

fiberglass debris in the lungs? 

Are they that afraid of what they will find?  Are they looking for sick people

to spend years doctor-shopping aimlessly for a competent diagnosis?  Are they

trying to drive people out of the U.S. to get competent medical treatment?

Objet: chi27-6.pdf (application/pdf

Obj " <ginloi@...>

Date: Lundi 23 Juin 2008, 17h07

 http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/downloads/pdf/chi/chi27-6.pdf

_____________________________________________________________________________

Envoyez avec . Une boite mail plus intelligente http://mail..fr