Guest guest Posted July 28, 2008 Report Share Posted July 28, 2008 http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed & pubmedid=1726724\ 7 Fungal Genet Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 July 1. Published in final edited form as: Fungal Genet Biol. 2007 July; 44(7): 641–647. Published online 2006 December 24. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2006.12.007. *Biomechanics of conidial dispersal in the toxic mold Stachybotrys chartarum * Tucker, L. Stolze, H. Kennedy, and P. Money1 Department of Botany, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, USA 1Corresponding author; e-mail, moneynp@... The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at Fungal Genet Biol. *Abstract* Conidial dispersal in Stachybotrys chartarum in response to low-velocity airflow was studied using a microflow apparatus. The maximum rate of spore release occurred during the first 5 min of airflow, followed by a dramatic reduction in dispersal that left more than 99% of the conidia attached to their conidiophores. Micromanipulation of undisturbed colonies showed that micronewton (μN) forces were needed to dislodge spore clusters from their supporting conidiophores. Calculations show that airspeeds that normally prevail in the indoor environment disturb colonies with forces that are 1,000-fold lower, in the nanonewton (nN) range. Low-velocity airflow does not, therefore, cause sufficient disturbance to disperse a large proportion of the conidia of S. chartarum. Keywords: allergen, conidiophore, digital video analysis, micromanipulation, mycotoxin, satratoxin, spore PDF: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1950243 & blobtype=pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.