Re: LA WEELY WRITES OF MY AND KELMAN'S LAWSUIT.

[Guest guest]

Fat fingers, filthy carpet? Trademark red lipstick...cheapens you up

a bit? This guy is out to cause some pain!!!

However he isn't so smart because he then tells us why:

" The Washington-based Manhattan Institute then paid Kelman to write a

simpler, lay version of the ACOEM report for the public in 2003. A

clearly elated U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which represents many

businesses and industries sued during the Mold Rush, released a very

abbreviated version. It stated: " The notion that toxic mold is an

insidious killer, as so many media reports and trial lawyers would

claim, is junk science. "

He then complains about Jed Waldman's clearly thoughtful position on

the issue as too costly, citing 'thousands' in mold abatement cost

per household affected, but considering the health care costs on the

other side of the equation, it's a costly savings.

" Jed Waldman, of the California Department of Public Health, says

that his agency's position is " that indoor mold contamination is

unhealthy and should be abated, whether or not those links become

better understood. "

At what cost? The state of California doesn't pay the bill, which can

easily amount to thousands of dollars by a middle-class family

on " mold abatement " in a home with normal, nonthreatening molds. "

>>

> Thank you, Sherry. I am blown away.