Guest guest Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 In a message dated 8/28/2008 9:54:26 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, happyru@... writes: " All truth goes through three stages. First it is ridiculed. Then it is violently opposed. Finally, it is accepted as self-evident.is (Schopenhauer) Yep. And we are rapidly moving into phase three. That's why they are making such asses of themselves, kicking and screaming all the way. **************It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here. (http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 Correct. The jury did not get to hear what the ACOEM statement really is or how it is used in litigation. We spoke to them afterwards. Based on what they were able to be told, they formed their conclusion. Here is the real kicker. They said they felt I do good work and they want me to continue. I don't think they realized by labeling me a malicious liar, they made it much more difficult for me to be heard as credible. We were able to get thru to them that Kelman is an old tobacco scientist. They got that. Kelman's lawyer told them to be sure to read the LA Weekly article. Dr. Harriet Ammann sat in a hotel room for two days waiting for the chance to testify. Mulvey was here, too. But we decided not to put her on because she would not be able to talk about the science or the usage of ACOEM either. There was a first amendment attorney on the jury panel. I think she was more upset than I was. She said they misinterpreted my passion for anger and that is how they determined malice. The judicial system is utterly amazing. It is no wonder our courts are clogged with things that should be easily decided. In a message dated 8/29/2008 11:51:11 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, ldelp84227@... writes: So basically the only evidence aloud pertaining in this case was to him changing his testimony and that is why all other info was denied. What happened on the Veritox part of the case. If Sharon had filed a case that this man or company is hurting people by writing the wrong info in these journals and getting paid as defense witnesses at the same time would she have been able to keep her evidence in this case. I know it gets very technical what is aloud and not and some times it is difficult to understand the reasons. I don't understand why we can't just go after the government for negligence or not doing anything to help people-- just as people have for autism, or governments go after the EPA, etc. Or at least how they fail to tell that healthy people can become ill, not just sick, infants, elderly, or even chemical sensitive such as FEMA just did. I think we were all healthy first then got candida, asthma, migraines, neurological problems, etc. **************It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here. (http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.