Update from the OK Corral

[Guest guest]

Dear All,

Thank all of you who sent words of support yesterday. Greatly appreciated.

This trial stuff is pretty weird business if you ask me. We did not even

get far enough to pick a jury yesterday.

There is a BUNCH of stuff Kelman wants kept out of this libel suit. Like

the Wall Street Journal article, all of my published writings, my advocacy work

in DC. Senator Kennedy's GAO audit request. And all the groups that are

supporting the need for a Congressional hearing into the conflicts of interest

of the matter.

The judge does not appear to be getting it as to why I wrote the phrase

" altered his under oath statements " PLURAL " statements " . She is focusing on one

alliteration, which is exactly what Kelman wants her to do. We got a brand new

judge yesterday. She knew virtually nothing of the case other than what she

has read from prior rulings.

VeriTox does not want to go into the science one iota. If you were a

scientists who was claiming your reputation had been defamed, wouldn't you want

to

go into the science?

I am going to have a hard time explaining to the jury why Kelman was

waffling when describing the relationship of ACOEM and the US Chamber of

Commerce

paper when forced to discuss them together in front of a jury without going

into his little feat of scientific magic.

You can read his testimony in question and my press release here.

_http://moldwarriors.com/SK/index.htm_ (http://moldwarriors.com/SK/index.htm)

The judge may not get why he was " altering his under oath statements " , but I

know all of you do. So we are not going to discuss Kelman's " science " aka

" marketing " . So it is going to be very weird when I get on the witness stand.

How do I answer questions for the jury of why Kelman was altering without

being able to answer questions?

We will see what today brings. ...C'est la vie! Whatever happens in the

court case, I am not shutting up about Kelman applying mathematical

extrapolations to a study of rodents and from there, concluding that humans

claiming of

illness from " toxic mold " are simply a result of " trial lawyers, media hype

and junk science " .

BTW, did anyone read the USA Today about the soldiers at Fort Sills being in

moldy environments?

_http://www.usatodayhttp://wwwhttp://wwhttp://www.http://www_

(http://www.usatoday.com/news/military/2008-08-17-mold_N.htm)

Guess who the Department of Justice hired to defeat the claims of illness in

children in military housing at Fort Sills. And guess which position paper

they relied on to say these children's symptoms " could not be " from their

moldy military housing.

See Coreen Robbins and Bruce Kelman in vs. US attached.

**************It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel

deal here.

(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)