Guest guest Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 Verdict: $125,000 in mold lawsuit ton Post Courier - ton,SC* By Prentiss Findlay (Contact) The Post and Courier Tuesday, August 19, 2008 http://www.charleston.net/news/2008/aug/19/verdict_mold_lawsuit51298/ A Berkeley County jury has returned a verdict of $50,000 in actual damages and $75,000 in punitive damages against Prudential Carolina Real Estate because an agent allegedly sold residential property without disclosing that it had a toxic mold problem, plaintiff's attorney said Monday. Prudential Carolina attorney Scarafile said post-trial motions have yet to be heard by trial Judge Young, so the verdict is not finalized. " This matter is not concluded at the trial court level, " Scarafile said. At issue in the trial was whether Prudential Carolina should have provided two mold reports on the property to the buyers, Scarafile said. He said an offer was made to remedy the mold problem but it was rejected. Dana E. Winters and la C. Winters filed suit against Prudential Carolina Real Estate and agent Barbara s in Berkeley County. The verdict was returned last Wednesday, said. The suit sought $1.5 million in damages. s did not return a call seeking comment. The Winters bought property at 2105 Live Oak Drive in Moncks Corner in 2005 for $110,000. It included a house and a store. The store is now a bike shop. They intended to renovate the home and offer it for rent but the Winters discovered it had a black mold problem. The suit alleged that the defendants knew or should have known about the mold problem and failed to disclose the information before the sale. " She (s) knew about the mold problem and she didn't tell us, " la Winters said. Scarafile said the property was sold under an " as is " contract with buyer acknowledgement of the presence of mold in the house. " They had to abandon the house. They're still paying the mortgage on it, " said. la Winters said that a woman who had an earlier contract to buy the property told them that the house had a problem with toxic black mold. The woman told the Winters about the mold issue after they bought the property, la Winters said. Another Berkeley County court case involving household mold is pending. A Island family who fled their home after receiving mold test results has sued builder D.R. Horton Inc., alleging negligence resulting in permanent and life-threatening physical injuries. An attorney for and Joy filed the lawsuit alleging that substandard construction led to water intrusion and mold that seriously affected their health and that of their 3-year- old daughter. The Winters' lawsuit does not allege detrimental health effects because of an undisclosed mold problem at the house on the property they purchased. Reach Prentiss Findlay at 937-5711 or pfindlay@.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 This award is WAY too small as they are sick. Even if you ignore that which would be crazy because the impact on somebody's life is huge, they are still out a huge amount of money because the lawyer takes at least a third. The award should take that and the difficulty of bringing these lawsuits in the face of an official cover-up into stock. I guess what I am trying to say is that public health demands that these things stop and the law needs to do whatever t takes to stop them, part of which I think should be punishing clear violations of the fiduciary duty of sellers. This kind of thing goes on all the time and when it happens, the ugly reality is that the mold reports often do not get shown to prospective buyers so they can make an informed decision and hire their own inspectors to do a THOROUGH inspection of the house. Its really important. That company should have provided the mold reports to the buyer before purchase. That is part of their responsibility as a FIDUCIARY. There is NO excuse for not doing so. Now they are quite possibly hypersensitized to mold. On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 7:30 AM, tigerpaw2c <tigerpaw2c@...> wrote: > Verdict: $125,000 in mold lawsuit > ton Post Courier - ton,SC* > By Prentiss Findlay (Contact) > The Post and Courier > Tuesday, August 19, 2008 > > http://www.charleston.net/news/2008/aug/19/verdict_mold_lawsuit51298/ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.