the whole immune systrm thing blows me away

September 3, 2008

when someone gets it straight, give me a call. about the only thing I

know for sure is that allergy testing and immunoglobulin testing does

prove alot more than some would like us to know and I sujest it be done

asap after exposure or during exposure and again later on.

as it appears to me that it does show proof of exposure and immune

effects even if it's not totally understood exactly whats what. maybe

with more testing of immunoglobulins they would figure it all out.

still seems to me that by putting everything in one group and calling

them allergens/allergies is the biggest problem here as theres

obviously a difference in doses regarding allergens and toxins even

though they are all pathogenic or cause pathogenic immune effects. when

it all meshes together like that and no dose responce is figured out

than there needs to be a seperation in some other way. theres a hudge

difference in haveing a allergy effect and haveing a anaphylaxis

effect/like effect and so on. yes, I have come to detest the

word " allergy "

" IgG,infection,IgE,inflammation " search

th1,th2 responces in the lungs/cited

immunoglobulins,lung,mucosa, cited

September 6, 2008

I agree, I'm beginning to detest thet word " allergy " as well, even

thogh I know I have allergies to pollen, dust mites, animal dander,

etc but I have tested twice as not being " allergic " to molds. The

Infectious Disease doctor I went to (who didn't know much about mold

toxins/mycotoxins) basically said if I was having symptoms from mold

in my home that I should go back to the allergist since I was

basically having an allergy, ( " allergic " effects). He diagnosed me as

having " allergies " (which most doctors I have seen say the same thing

because they don't understand the difference between an " allergic "

response and a toxic response. It's so frustrating!!!!!!

Recommended Posts