Guest guest Posted October 27, 2008 Report Share Posted October 27, 2008 Hate to tell you this but Chocalate is aspergillius based, like soy suace. From: joseph salowitz <josephsalowitz@...> Subject: [] Re: A Warm Cup of Ochratoxin? Date: Monday, October 27, 2008, 5:14 AM I put up a pot of water to boil, to make my morning instant coffee. While I waited for it to come to a boil, I read the below posting, by barb1283. I clicked on the first link to the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and read the report. I noticed, at the bottom of that report, a further link to the instruction booklet that the FAO hopes that coffee growers and processors will read, to minimize the amount of mold in my morning cup of coffee. As I was skimming through that instruction manual, the water kettle began to whistle, from the boiling water. I went into the kitchen, turned off the kettle, AND MADE MYSELF A NICE CUP OF HOT CHOCOLATE! Thanks barb. ............. ......... ......... ......... .... > > Coffee is usually contaminated with Ochratoxin A, from aspergillus, as well as wine and grape juice. All articles on Ochratoxin in food mentioned coffee. A few mentioned coffe, wine and grape juice though. Perhaps the concern over coffee is growing due to the increased consumption of coffee? > > http://www.fao. org/ag/magazine/ 0607sp1.htm > > http://www.medicaln ewstoday. com/articles/ 14906.php > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2008 Report Share Posted October 27, 2008 Where does it say that a large amount of US coffee is contaminated with OTA? Clearly, OTA is a contaminant farmers and the food industry have to be viglant about, and coffee is a crop that often has issues with it, but its also my understanding that the US food supply is far less contaminated than many other countries. Certainly, there are issues, but I think it's inaccurate to imply that typically coffee is contaminated with OTA. That is also not what those documents Barb linked say. So why imply that it is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2008 Report Share Posted October 27, 2008 Responsible US food distributors and farmers (although there are only a few coffee producers in the US and they tend to produce extremely expensive, high end coffee only) devote a LOT of energy to testing food for mycotoxins.. In fact, there is a substantial business in the US testing food for mycotoxins.. If we could get even a tiny fraction of those folks interested in helping us improve the safety of homes it would be a BIG accomplishment. I don't think it would be at all impossible. They want to help. They know that these things DO happen, too. Honestly, I think many of them would very much like to help us, but they don't know where to begin. The business angle is that this is a field they are not very familiar with. They would need some help. Also, the economics of scale need to be brought to bear on a number of technical issues to make them more affordable. That also isn't really that out of the question, I don't think. Its not " rocket science " (or even close). Its basically a problem of moving a lot of air and capturing stuff out of it. In particular, the sampling technologies that are affordable for use by most of us would need to improve. Anybody can operate a vacumn pump and a spore trap. That is why so many people are hanging out shingles as " mold inspectors " . But spore traps are not effective as a total solution for mold testing. Mold health issues and the presence of spores are not the same thing. QPCR would be a far better candidate for a single method used if only one method is used, but IMO, for something this important, simply using one method is anadequate. Toxin testing is something we need to be able to do much more and much more affordably. Disturbingly, the most significant mycotoxins from a public health standpoint are extremely powerful- they effect health at levels well below our current ability to detect them on surfaces, for example. So, that means that in order for mycotoxin testing to be able to offer the holy grail of a go / no go test for buildings, a huge amount of air needs to be sampled and the mycotoxin in it needs to be captured in something, (I would say the most viable option is a buffered solution) for analysis. Thats what it would take to be able to concentrate it to the point where it was able to be analyzed meaningfully. Thats a technology that is still not available to most (almost all!) of the people who need it. The cost needs to come down and the hardware needed to do it needs to shrink in both size and cost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2008 Report Share Posted October 27, 2008 Barb, I don't know if what you are saying is true or not, but its scary as hell if it is true. For that reason, I would like to see some references if you have them. (I'm assuming that's what you mean when you say " my research " , right?) Honestly, I would be very surprised if more than a tiny percentage of coffee say, randomly bought in US supermarkets, was found to be contaminated with OTA. If it is, this would be a significant health issue..because OTA is a neurotoxin, one that has the potential to cause major problems like parkinsonism. If you have evidence that there is, then it would stand to reason that this was a significant health issue on a lot of different levels. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16844142 * *J Neurol Sci. <javascript:AL_get(this,%20'jour',%20'J%20Neurol%20Sci.');>2006 Nov 1;249(1):68-75. Epub 2006 Jul 14.[image: Click here to read]<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/utils/fref.fcgi?PrId=3048 & itool=Abstrac\ tPlus-def & uid=16844142 & db=pubmed & url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii\ /S0022-510X%2806%2900290-5> Links <javascript:PopUpMenu2_Set(Menu16844142);> Can low level exposure to ochratoxin-A cause parkinsonism? *Sava V*<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed & Cmd=Search & Term=%22Sava%20\ V%22%5BAuthor%5D & itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_D\ iscoveryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus>, *Reunova O*<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed & Cmd=Search & Term=%22Reunova\ %20O%22%5BAuthor%5D & itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubme\ d_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus>, *Velasquez A*<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed & Cmd=Search & Term=%22Velasqu\ ez%20A%22%5BAuthor%5D & itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pub\ med_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus>, *-Ramos J*<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed & Cmd=Search & Term=%22\ -Ramos%20J%22%5BAuthor%5D & itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel\ ..Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus> .. University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. Mycotoxins are fungal metabolites with pharmacological activities that have been utilized in the production of antibiotics, growth promoters, and other classes of drugs. Some mycotoxins have been developed as biological and chemical warfare agents. Bombs and ballistic missiles loaded with aflatoxin were stockpiled and may have been deployed by Iraq during the first Gulf War. In light of the excess incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in veterans from Operation Desert Storm, the potential for delayed neurotoxic effects of low doses of mycotoxins should not be overlooked. Ochratoxin-A (OTA) is a common mycotoxin with complex mechanisms of action, similar to that of the aflatoxins. Acute administration of OTA at non-lethal doses (10% of the LD(50)) have been shown to increase oxidative DNA damage in brain up to 72 h, with peak effects noted at 24 h in midbrain (MB), caudate/putamen (CP) and hippocampus (HP). Levels of dopamine (DA) and its metabolites in the striatum (e.g., CP) were shown to be decreased in a dose-dependent manner. The present study focused on the effects of chronic low dose OTA exposure on regional brain oxidative stress and striatal DA metabolism. Continuous administration of low doses of OTA with implanted subcutaneous Alzet minipumps caused a small but significant decrease in striatal DA levels and an upregulation of anti-oxidative systems and DNA repair. It is possible that low dose exposure to OTA will result in an earlier onset of parkinsonism when normal age-dependent decline in striatal DA levels are superimposed on the mycotoxin-induced lesion. PMID: 16844142 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Related Articles - Acute neurotoxic effects of the fungal metabolite ochratoxin-A.<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16140385?ordinalpos=1 & itool=Ent\ rezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Disco\ very_RA & linkpos=1 & log$=relatedarticles & logdbfrom=pubmed> [Neurotoxicology. 2006] - Rubratoxin B elicits antioxidative and DNA repair responses in mouse brain.<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15200233?ordinalpos=1 & itool=EntrezSyst\ em2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_RA\ & linkpos=2 & log$=relatedarticles & logdbfrom=pubmed> [Gene Expr. 2004] - A new approach to studying ochratoxin A (OTA)-induced nephrotoxicity: expression profiling in vivo and in vitro employing cDNA microarrays.<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12700408?ordinalpos=1 & itool=Entr\ ezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discov\ ery_RA & linkpos=3 & log$=relatedarticles & logdbfrom=pubmed> [Toxicol Sci. 2003] - Oxidative damage and stress response from ochratoxin a exposure in rats.<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11369498?ordinalpos=1 & itool=EntrezSyste\ m2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_RA & \ linkpos=4 & log$=relatedarticles & logdbfrom=pubmed> [Free Radic Biol Med. 2001] - Oxidative DNA damage in the aging mouse brain.<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10584672?ordinalpos=1 & itool=EntrezSyst\ em2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_RA\ & linkpos=5 & log$=relatedarticles & logdbfrom=pubmed> [Mov Disord. 1999] - » See all Related Articles...<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed & DbFrom=pubmed & Cmd\ =Link & LinkName=pubmed_pubmed & LinkReadableName=Related%20Articles & IdsFromResult=1\ 6844142 & ordinalpos=1 & itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubm\ ed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_RA & log$=relatedarticles & logdbfrom=pubmed> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 5:28 PM, barb1283 <barb1283@...> wrote: > ...but actually Live, my research DOES seem to say that most, if not > all, coffee is contaminated with ochratoxin. It's just a matter > of 'how much' is in it. There are efforts to figure out a way to > manage production to keep level low and try to figure out what level of > ochratoxin could safely be allowed. > Sorry..I thought you said that 'I said that US was singled out' in > article and it was not. > > > > > > Certainly, there are > > issues, but I think it's inaccurate to imply that typically coffee is > > contaminated with OTA. > > > > That is also not what those documents Barb linked say. So why imply > that it is? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2008 Report Share Posted October 27, 2008 Unfortunately, I can't drink coffee, I have not been able to for a very long time. I can't even drink tea. I have reflux. Caffeine and reflux don't mix. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.