Guest guest Posted September 20, 2000 Report Share Posted September 20, 2000 http://web.philly.com/content/inquirer/2000/09/13/business/SUN13.htm?templat e=aprint.htm Wednesday, September 13, 2000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Refinery incidents lead to charges By Mark Jaffe INQUIRER STAFF WRITER The city yesterday charged Sunoco's South Philadelphia refinery with 15 air-quality violations related to a string of fires, explosions and air-pollution incidents over the summer. The refinery was cited for three separate incidents. Each violation has a maximum fine of $25,000. " We are concerned that so many incidents happened in such a short space of time, " said Fine, director of Air Management Services, the city agency that oversees air quality. Fine said his agency would meet with Sunoco Inc. officials to review the incidents. " We want to get a clear idea of what happened and what can be done to prevent these accidents in the future, " he said. Fine said Sunoco can appeal the citations to the city's Licenses Review Board and, if the two sides are still at odds, the case could go to court. Gerald , a spokesman for Sunoco, said the company received the violation notices yesterday and is reviewing them. But he said that the company would arrange quickly to meet with city officials and that it " hopes to address the issues in a spirit of cooperation. " " No one feels it more than Sunoco when things of this kind happen, " said. Community groups issued a statement yesterday calling for stronger inspections and enforcement actions by the city. " South Philadelphia deserves reasonable assurances these events will not be repeated, said Schultz, associate director of Clean Water Action, a local environmental group. Schultz said the community was concerned about U.S. Labor Department complaints filed against the refinery dealing with operator training. The first accident in the most recent events occurred on June 21, when an operating failure resulted in the release of a huge cloud of alumina silica catalyst - a gritty, yellow dust - which settled on the surrounding community. While the dust is not toxic, Sunoco recommended that people not come in prolonged contact with it, and that individuals with pulmonary problems avoid the dust. " If reports linking operator error to pollution emissions from the catalytic cracking unit are true, " Schultz said, " the incident might have been avoided. " On June 30, an underground pipe carrying heated gasoline under high pressure exploded and caused a fire. One worker was hurt. The explosion was so strong that it rattled windows throughout South Philadelphia. It took two hours to control the fire, which billowed thick, black smoke and caused traffic jams on the Schuylkill Expressway and the nearby C. Platt Bridge. The final incident occurred on Sept. 7 when an explosion and fire rocked the heat exchanger of a crude-oil unit. Three Sunoco workers and one city fireman were injured. In 1995, the city and community groups were preparing to take Sunoco to court over air-pollution problems at the refinery. But after two years of negotiations, the community, city and company reached an agreement. Sunoco agreed to pay $150,000 in civil fines and spend $5 million to upgrade air-pollution controls at the refinery. It also provided $350,000 to the community for environmental projects. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Mark Jaffe's e-mail address is mjaffe@... © 2000 Philadelphia Newspapers Inc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.