Guest guest Posted October 24, 2008 Report Share Posted October 24, 2008 Tina, First, forgive my snarky response to your question, " How do you read a mold report? " My answer is with a flaming match held closely to the lower right hand corner. If you are left-handed, it will be the lower left hand corner. I had a long day at a new house, not quite finished, for what was supposed to be a simple mold inspection in the crawlspace. There was a little visible mold in one spot but was insignificant compared to what was needed to prevent big problems because of water issues and construction defects throughout. It is a case study on how irrelevant mold reports usualy are. Improper flashing at the edge of decks allowing water to soak back below the surface, stone steps with cracked grout and no protective membrane beneath alllowing snow-melt to leak inside the house with framing showing signs of rot - and the buyer is supposed to close next Wednesday. Flagstone walkways cracking as we walked on them because they were improperly installed, a wood panel installed to hold back dirt in a penetration to the foundation but it was saturated with water draining down to it and into the crawlspace, vapor barriers on exterior walls installed incorrectly, a radon contractor offering a lifetime guarantee but they been in business less than a year. Wonder if they will be around next year, let alone in 20 years. Shall I go on? Oh yes, it was not a house of cheap construction and ill-repute. It was a multi-million dollar house at a ski resort. I took no mold samples because to do so would be a waste of money. The priority, instead, is to work with the builder to gain his cooperation to stop the current leaks and fix the pending ones for prevention. It's going to cost him and his subcontractors at least $30,000 because they will have to tear out some construction and start over. Decent consultation fees for me and keeps me working but it is aggravating when problems such as these, and what many on this group experience, are so totally and absolutley unnecessary. Now that I have vented, I need to ask some questions before I know what the numbers mean. 1. Who took the samples and why did he take them? Only the person who developed the sampling plan, collected the samples and interpreted the data knows how to read his report. Everybody does it differently. Why samples of which type were collected at their particular locations are all necessary to begin to understand what the numbers mean. The fact he won't discuss the meaning is a giant red flag that he doesn't know what they mean either. It's called suck air, collect money, leave. 2. Where inside the house were they taken? 3. Where outside the house were they taken? 4. Was the outside sample taken first or last? Most take the outside sample last which completely destroys the outside to inside comparison based on the outside moving to the inside. 5. What sampling method? It appears a spore-trap was used based on the unit of measure in " spores/m3 " rather than culturing which would be in CFU/m3. Plus, the Penicillium/Aspergillus identification. So a better question would be what was the flow rate of the pump, how long did it run, had it been calibrated and what was the debris rating? 6. What is the history of the house? If it was flooded a month ago and this is what's left after clean-up you are in very good shape. If the samples were collected for " clearance " inside a containment with air scrubbers running there is still a source of mold. 7. Did you react when visiting the house? If so, did the complaints stop once you left? Or did it take several hours? Some people would have no reactions to 10 times these levels but another individual could have a life threatening asthma attack from exposure to any one of them at 1/10 these numbers. Where are you on the sensitivity scale? 8. The total lack of Cladosporium outside, because it is almost always present, raises questions about proper identification of the spores by the lab. Was the lab AIHA or A2LA certified and independant from the inspector? Was the sample was actually collected outdoors? Did you witness it? I've seen samples taken inside by others, right in front of me, with a window open. And the collection air pump was readjusted to an improper flow rate. 9. Are the numbers from just two samples or were others collected and the numbers given you are an average? There's more but I think you get the idea. The numbers must have a context in order to have any meaning. There is no meaning in the numbers themselves. They need a history of moisture events, the type of building and its systems, the climate and time of year, the susceptibility profile of the occupants, a definition of the problem so a question can be developed which only sampling can answer, etc. Because you are considering buying the property I suggest you need all the other information more than you need lab samples. I guarantee that if the same person took samples tomorrow in the same locations, they would get different results. What does that mean? So don't feel too badly about not figuring out how to interpret the numbers. Nobody can. Instead, focus on identifying locations of dampness conducive to the growth of mold and bacteria and how you personally experience the house. That will give you much more accurate and representative basis for making a decision than a few mold samples will. In the meantime, to learn more, start by going to http://www.epa.gov/iaq/molds/ and read the free information and take the short video training course. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats ----- > I just spent the last hour trying to research how to read a mold > report and there are no answers. I am considering buying a condo and > I had it inspected. The company that took the report is unwilling to > discuss it with me because I stupidly went through a middleman. > > What do these scores mean? They are spores/m3: > > Cladosporium (inside): 720 > > Curvularia (inside): 40 > > Other Basidiospores (outside): 40 > > Penicillium/Aspergillus (inside): 280 > Penicillium/Aspergillus (outside): 400 > > Unidentified spores (inside): 40 > > Are these scores bad? I'm trying to buy this property but now I am > thinking of canceling the deal. Can mold be removed? > > > > ------------------------------------ > > FAIR USE NOTICE: > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2008 Report Share Posted October 25, 2008 1) An inspector I hired took the samples and sent them to a company in Weston, FL. 2) Its a condo and they took them from the living room, according to the report. Which concerns me because I know there are loose tiles in the bathroom and I'm sure the count is much higher there. There was also moisture found on the adjacent wall in the bedroom. Not a lot, but present. 3) Outside they were taken on the first floor balcony which is right near the pool. 4) I'm not sure which was taken first or whether they were taken simultaneously. 5) I don't know any of these answers. Myself and the realtor showed up about an hour after he had arrived and the machine was running for at least a half hour after that. 6) Its a first floor condo near the ocean built in 1973. The grounds are impeccably maintained, as is the pool. It is an expensive place to live, relatively. 7) I didn't have any reactions. 8) All I know in response to these questions is that the lab is AIHA accredited. 9) Don't know the answers to these questions. I know that there is a problem with the tiles being loose in the shower. If this is fixed, is this likely to clear up the problem? Do I need to get rid of all the carpets? Thanks for your help. --- In , " Carl E. Grimes " <grimes@...> wrote: > > Tina, > > First, forgive my snarky response to your question, " How do you > read a mold report? " > > My answer is with a flaming match held closely to the lower right > hand corner. If you are left-handed, it will be the lower left hand > corner. > > I had a long day at a new house, not quite finished, for what was > supposed to be a simple mold inspection in the crawlspace. > There was a little visible mold in one spot but was insignificant > compared to what was needed to prevent big problems because > of water issues and construction defects throughout. It is a case > study on how irrelevant mold reports usualy are. > > Improper flashing at the edge of decks allowing water to soak > back below the surface, stone steps with cracked grout and no > protective membrane beneath alllowing snow-melt to leak inside > the house with framing showing signs of rot - and the buyer is > supposed to close next Wednesday. Flagstone walkways > cracking as we walked on them because they were improperly > installed, a wood panel installed to hold back dirt in a penetration > to the foundation but it was saturated with water draining down to > it and into the crawlspace, vapor barriers on exterior walls > installed incorrectly, a radon contractor offering a lifetime > guarantee but they been in business less than a year. Wonder if > they will be around next year, let alone in 20 years. > > Shall I go on? Oh yes, it was not a house of cheap construction > and ill-repute. It was a multi-million dollar house at a ski resort. > > I took no mold samples because to do so would be a waste of > money. The priority, instead, is to work with the builder to gain his > cooperation to stop the current leaks and fix the pending ones for > prevention. It's going to cost him and his subcontractors at least > $30,000 because they will have to tear out some construction and > start over. Decent consultation fees for me and keeps me > working but it is aggravating when problems such as these, and > what many on this group experience, are so totally and absolutley > unnecessary. > > Now that I have vented, I need to ask some questions before I > know what the numbers mean. > > 1. Who took the samples and why did he take them? Only the > person who developed the sampling plan, collected the samples > and interpreted the data knows how to read his report. Everybody > does it differently. Why samples of which type were collected at > their particular locations are all necessary to begin to understand > what the numbers mean. The fact he won't discuss the meaning > is a giant red flag that he doesn't know what they mean either. It's > called suck air, collect money, leave. > > 2. Where inside the house were they taken? > > 3. Where outside the house were they taken? > > 4. Was the outside sample taken first or last? Most take the > outside sample last which completely destroys the outside to > inside comparison based on the outside moving to the inside. > > 5. What sampling method? It appears a spore-trap was used > based on the unit of measure in " spores/m3 " rather than culturing > which would be in CFU/m3. Plus, the Penicillium/Aspergillus > identification. So a better question would be what was the flow > rate of the pump, how long did it run, had it been calibrated and > what was the debris rating? > > 6. What is the history of the house? If it was flooded a month ago > and this is what's left after clean-up you are in very good shape. If > the samples were collected for " clearance " inside a containment > with air scrubbers running there is still a source of mold. > > 7. Did you react when visiting the house? If so, did the complaints > stop once you left? Or did it take several hours? Some people > would have no reactions to 10 times these levels but another > individual could have a life threatening asthma attack from > exposure to any one of them at 1/10 these numbers. Where are > you on the sensitivity scale? > > 8. The total lack of Cladosporium outside, because it is almost > always present, raises questions about proper identification of the > spores by the lab. Was the lab AIHA or A2LA certified and > independant from the inspector? Was the sample was actually > collected outdoors? Did you witness it? I've seen samples taken > inside by others, right in front of me, with a window open. And the > collection air pump was readjusted to an improper flow rate. > > 9. Are the numbers from just two samples or were others > collected and the numbers given you are an average? > > There's more but I think you get the idea. The numbers must > have a context in order to have any meaning. There is no > meaning in the numbers themselves. They need a history of > moisture events, the type of building and its systems, the climate > and time of year, the susceptibility profile of the occupants, a > definition of the problem so a question can be developed which > only sampling can answer, etc. > > Because you are considering buying the property I suggest you > need all the other information more than you need lab samples. I > guarantee that if the same person took samples tomorrow in the > same locations, they would get different results. What does that > mean? > > So don't feel too badly about not figuring out how to interpret the > numbers. Nobody can. Instead, focus on identifying locations of > dampness conducive to the growth of mold and bacteria and how > you personally experience the house. That will give you much > more accurate and representative basis for making a decision > than a few mold samples will. > > In the meantime, to learn more, start by going to > http://www.epa.gov/iaq/molds/ and read the free information and > take the short video training course. > > Carl Grimes > Healthy Habitats > > ----- > > I just spent the last hour trying to research how to read a mold > > report and there are no answers. I am considering buying a condo and > > I had it inspected. The company that took the report is unwilling to > > discuss it with me because I stupidly went through a middleman. > > > > What do these scores mean? They are spores/m3: > > > > Cladosporium (inside): 720 > > > > Curvularia (inside): 40 > > > > Other Basidiospores (outside): 40 > > > > Penicillium/Aspergillus (inside): 280 > > Penicillium/Aspergillus (outside): 400 > > > > Unidentified spores (inside): 40 > > > > Are these scores bad? I'm trying to buy this property but now I am > > thinking of canceling the deal. Can mold be removed? > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > FAIR USE NOTICE: > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2008 Report Share Posted October 25, 2008 Mold exists in all homes. Its a matter of degree, and I'm trying to find out how high these levels are. > > Tina, > I wouldn't do it. If your sensetive to mold there shouldn't be any mold. > When in doubt throw it out, when in doubt get the heck out!! > When in doubt ? Don't go in!! > Not worth it. there are places with out moluds. > Thats my 2 cents for what it worth. > a > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.