Doctor doesn't think mold harmed U? Read IJOEH Craner article to understand WHY!

[Guest guest]

Dear All,

If you are sick from mold and your doctor is not understanding or does not

believe mold can cause your symptoms, you really owe it to yourself to read the

IJOEH paper by Dr. Craner. It is a great paper that explains ALOT

about why your doctor might think that way and what he has had marketed to him

about mold induced illnesses.

_http://www.ijoeh.com/index.php/ijoeh/article/view/1081_

(http://www.ijoeh.com/index.php/ijoeh/article/view/1081)

Dr. Craner is a Fellow American College of Occupational and Environmental

Medicine. (ACOEM) His paper on how the Mold Position statement came to be,

really is quite good and enlightening about what a shoddy job ACOEM did with

their peer review, that has caused so much misery in the lives of many.

So just within the past week, the IJOEH publishes a paper by an ACOEM member

calling out the slacker peer review that brought us false science policy

claiming scientifically proven NOT plausible.

And the Federal GAO is recommending that it is time for the Federal

government to issue public health statements that are consistent between all

agencies, while noting there is indeed plausibility that many of the symptoms

are

caused/exaserbated by damp indoor environments/mold.

So within a week, one paper outs what is NOT legit science, while the other

brings greater light to what IS legit science.

Posted before, the recommendations of the Federal GAO are quite good.

I think the recommendations of the IJOEH/Craner paper are quite good, too:

1. The ACOEM should develop a formal process for

Declarations of Conflicts of Interest for all its members

and staff. These Declarations should also be

adopted by JOEM and its editorial and publications

staffs. ACOEM should establish a course of conduct

for when potential conflicts of interest influence the

practice of OEM, and enforce it accordingly. An

expedient but reliable method to verify the veracity

and completeness of such declarations, particularly

as they relate to disclosure of expert witness work in

related litigation, must be developed and consistently

implemented.

2. JOEM needs to develop a more rigorous system of

peer review. Management and editorial staff should

not make exceptions from the formal review

process.

3. The ACOEM should develop a formal Transparency

Policy to ensure that members are fully informed of

all activities and non-members can be informed

without impediment. The minutes of various committee

meetings should be placed on the website

and made available to members. All correspondence

between officers, staff, and committee members

should be put into electronic format and copied to

the website.

4. The ACOEM Code of Conduct must be extended to

include many topics ignored by the current document.

The ACOEM membership should develop a

Code that is enforceable, and one that would not allow

a recurrence of the problems that have characterized

the development of the ACOEM Mold Statement.

Slowly but surely, we are getting there!!!!

Sharon Noonan Kramer

**************BUY Indiana and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull on DVD

today!

(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1209326865x1200539441/aol?redir=http://\

www.indianajones.com/site/index.html)