Guest guest Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 Let us be careful regarding this health problem. I have been thinking about this case, because it has been about 4 years since I saw these two girls. The health history taken by me and Dr. are on record in Dr. 's office. As I recall there is also a good probability that these two girls were exposed to polluted waters (ponds/lakes?) near their home. At the time that I saw these girls we were unable to ascertain the nature of this water pollution. Not only were the exposed to microbial growth (Bacteria and Molds) in their home, there is also a good probability of other toxins in the polluted waters in their play environment. Thus. the toxic effects of both microgial growth and other toxins must be considered. was the worst of the two, while Jaci also had evidence of neurological damage. I am not trying to minimize the microbial exposure, but we must also recognize other potential interactions. I do believe a consultation with Dr. Gray is a good idea. Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D. Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist www.drthrasher.org toxicologist1@... Off: 530--644-6035 Cell - 575-937-1150 L. Crawley, M.ED., LADC Trauma Specialist sandracrawley@... 530-644-6035 - Off 775-309-3994 - Cell This message and any attachments forwarded with it is to be considered privileged and confidential. The forwarding or redistribution of this message (and any attachments) without my prior written consent is strictly prohibited and may violate privacy laws. Once the intended purpose of this message has been served, please destroy the original message contents. If you have received this message in error, please reply immediately to advise the sender of the miscommunication and then delete the message and any copies you have printed. Thank you in advance for your compliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 Not only that but 's Uncle Mike informed me that has also tested positive to bartonella, mycoplasma, and HHV-6 and her Bowen QRIBb test for Lyme disease was the highest at 1:128. So there are many factors concerning here. V > > Let us be careful regarding this health problem. I have been thinking about this case, because it has been about 4 years since I saw these two girls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 Dr.Thrasher & , Thanks for that info. Mike is also the one I have been speaking with. KC > > Let us be careful regarding this health problem. I have been thinking about this case, because it has been about 4 years since I saw these two girls. The health history taken by me and Dr. are on record in Dr. 's office. As I recall there is also a good probability that these two girls were exposed to polluted waters (ponds/lakes?) near their home. At the time that I saw these girls we were unable to ascertain the nature of this water pollution. Not only were the exposed to microbial growth (Bacteria and Molds) in their home, there is also a good probability of other toxins in the polluted waters in their play environment. Thus. the toxic effects of both microgial growth and other toxins must be considered. was the worst of the two, while Jaci also had evidence of neurological damage. I am not trying to minimize the microbial exposure, but we must also recognize other potential interactions. I do believe a consultation with Dr. Gray is a good idea. > > Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D. > Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist > www.drthrasher.org > toxicologist1@... > Off: 530--644-6035 > Cell - 575-937-1150 > > > L. Crawley, M.ED., LADC > Trauma Specialist > sandracrawley@... > 530-644-6035 - Off > 775-309-3994 - Cell > > > > > This message and any attachments forwarded with it is to be considered privileged and confidential. The forwarding or redistribution of this message (and any attachments) without my prior written consent is strictly prohibited and may violate privacy laws. Once the intended purpose of this message has been served, please destroy the original message contents. If you have received this message in error, please reply immediately to advise the sender of the miscommunication and then delete the message and any copies you have printed. Thank you in advance for your compliance. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 Dr. Thrasher, I have a question. I understand your post that other environmental exposures could affect these girls, however, their story did mention they went to MAYO. I, too, went to MAYO and the neurologists did just about every type of toxic exposure test except mold. (Unless there is another political taboo exposure). Do you think the water pollution should show up in some of the blood test? I believe mold cold do this because my body was shutting down before I fled my home. However, I, too, am not trying to state that mold is the reason. Puzzling thing is with twins, the genetic make up is so similar, I wonder why only one was affected? I wonder, have these girls been to the renowned Barrow Clinic? www.thebarrow.org > From: Jack Thrasher, Ph.D. <toxicologist1@...> > Subject: [] Re:Why is paralyzed? > > Date: Wednesday, December 24, 2008, 9:17 AM > Let us be careful regarding this health problem. I have > been thinking about this case, because it has been about 4 > years since I saw these two girls. The health history taken > by me and Dr. are on record in Dr. 's > office. As I recall there is also a good probability that > these two girls were exposed to polluted waters > (ponds/lakes?) near their home. At the time that I saw > these girls we were unable to ascertain the nature of this > water pollution. Not only were the exposed to microbial > growth (Bacteria and Molds) in their home, there is also a > good probability of other toxins in the polluted waters in > their play environment. Thus. the toxic effects of both > microgial growth and other toxins must be considered. > was the worst of the two, while Jaci also had evidence of > neurological damage. I am not trying to minimize the > microbial exposure, but we must also recognize other > potential interactions. I do believe a consultation with > Dr. Gray is a good idea. > > Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D. > Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist > www.drthrasher.org > toxicologist1@... > Off: 530--644-6035 > Cell - 575-937-1150 > > > L. Crawley, M.ED., LADC > Trauma Specialist > sandracrawley@... > 530-644-6035 - Off > 775-309-3994 - Cell > > > > > This message and any attachments forwarded with it is to be > considered privileged and confidential. The forwarding or > redistribution of this message (and any attachments) without > my prior written consent is strictly prohibited and may > violate privacy laws. Once the intended purpose of this > message has been served, please destroy the original message > contents. If you have received this message in error, please > reply immediately to advise the sender of the > miscommunication and then delete the message and any copies > you have printed. Thank you in advance for your compliance. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 Have they contacted the Barrow Institute in Phoenix??? www.thebarrow.org This place is worth a look at. > > Thanks for that info. Mike is also the one I have been speaking with. > KC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 whats the barrow institute? Have they contacted the Barrow Institute in Phoenix??? www.thebarrow. org This place is worth a look at. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 25, 2008 Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 Here's the website. www.thebarrow. org > > Have they contacted the Barrow Institute in Phoenix??? > > www.thebarrow. org > > This place is worth a look at. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 25, 2008 Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 Thanks. I sent your suggestion to the family. ________________________________ From: semco_semco_semco <semco_semco_semco@...> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 7:24:15 PM Subject: [] Re:Why is paralyzed? Have they contacted the Barrow Institute in Phoenix??? www.thebarrow. org This place is worth a look at. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 26, 2008 Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 Yes, I was in shut-down before I left a stachybotrys exposure as well. I had progressed from actively healthy to head-bobbling, drooling, and unable to bathe myself. There was a profound disconnect between what my brain was signalling and what my body was responding to. Chronic mycotoxin exposure is capable of this. > > Dr. Thrasher, > > I have a question. I understand your post that other environmental exposures could affect these girls, however, their story did mention they went to MAYO. I, too, went to MAYO and the neurologists did just about every type of toxic exposure test except mold. (Unless there is another political taboo exposure). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 26, 2008 Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 The Mayo clinic did every test for toxins from water damaged buidling EXCEPT for mold?? > > Dr. Thrasher, > > I have a question. I understand your post that other environmental exposures could affect these girls, however, their story did mention they went to MAYO. I, too, went to MAYO and the neurologists did just about every type of toxic exposure test except mold. (Unless there is another political taboo exposure). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 26, 2008 Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 Thank you. I have passed along your comments to 's family. (I am not including the names of any Sickbuildings members when I pass the suggestions to the family.) ________________________________ From: khalyal <khalyal@...> Sent: Friday, December 26, 2008 2:53:55 PM Subject: [] Re:Why is paralyzed? Yes, I was in shut-down before I left a stachybotrys exposure as well. I had progressed from actively healthy to head-bobbling, drooling, and unable to bathe myself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 26, 2008 Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 This isn't a surprise about Mayo Clinic. The insurance industry has been using their wealth to " shut up " everyone about toxic mold, so even the organizations (like Mayo) who can and should help--won't help. Keep in mind that the insurance industry is following the same " play book " that the tobacco companies used----deny, deny, deny and pay lots of money to their so-called experts to repeat those denials in court. Another example similar to the Mayo Clinic one relates to a family who went to National Jewish Medical Center in Denver, Colorado. During the appointment and testing, the doctor was 100% in support of the family and was very clear about the dangers of toxic mold. A few weeks later when the actual report was received by the family, the doctor had changed his tune. It's well known that Clorox is a big contributor to National Jewish, and Clorox has a big stake in the toxic mold situation. ________________________________ From: barb1283 <barb1283@...> Sent: Friday, December 26, 2008 3:27:15 PM Subject: [] Re:Why is paralyzed? The Mayo clinic did every test for toxins from water damaged buidling EXCEPT for mold?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 26, 2008 Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 They did all types of toxin testing, I don't know which was related water damaged buildings, probably none. It would lead to mold. MAYO does NOT treat environmental medicine... PERIOD. They do not test for mold toxins. They do not treat mold exposed patients. PERIOD. > > The Mayo clinic did every test for toxins from water damaged buidling > EXCEPT for mold?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 26, 2008 Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 Has anyone adviced them about possable chemical's, perfumes, laundry soap's, exc. that may be possably contributing to her illness as something to consider trying to avoid and see if it helps any? my throat often trys to close up when i get around things like this. just wondering because I can see how if in a constant state of being very ill one might not realize or know how to explain that certain smells might be bothering them. it may help and would be worth trying to see if any relief comes from ridding the house of all scented things. shampoo's, soap's, candles, laundy soap's exc. to see if it helps. --- In , <brianc8452@...> wrote: > > Thank you. I have passed along your comments to 's family. (I am not including the names of any Sickbuildings members when I pass the suggestions to the family.) > ________________________________ > From: khalyal <khalyal@...> > > Sent: Friday, December 26, 2008 2:53:55 PM > Subject: [] Re:Why is paralyzed? > > > Yes, I was in shut-down before I left a stachybotrys exposure as well. > I had progressed from actively healthy to head-bobbling, drooling, > and unable to bathe myself. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 I bring this up because I have been in situations where I couldn't get away quickly from what was causeing a chemical reaction and after awhile with some exposures the caughing stops but the airways remain closed up and the felling of unwellness and weakness continues and gets worse. a child in a constant invironment filled with this smells and haveing chemical sensitivitys would be fellong very bad all the time, maybe just from the blankets and sheets on her bed washed in perfumed laundry soaps. someone comes in with perfume on and she may caugh some more than it may stop again, but it adds to her felling of unwellness. a mold case of chemical sensitivity may not cause as bad of brain effects and if it was a very gradual happening the brain effects might not be realized. from my experience in my first home I fell strongly that certain exposures can and do cause spinal infections and damage to to nerves and spine and may be so sneaky about brain effects that you might not realize that you are not thinking the greatest. I would be welling to try anything and I think this would be amoung things I'd try rather I really understood it or not. I think anyone thats sick from anything would do better with very freah clean air. --- In , <brianc8452@...> wrote: > > Thank you. I have passed along your comments to 's family. (I am not including the names of any Sickbuildings members when I pass the suggestions to the family.) > ________________________________ > From: khalyal <khalyal@...> > > Sent: Friday, December 26, 2008 2:53:55 PM > Subject: [] Re:Why is paralyzed? > > > Yes, I was in shut-down before I left a stachybotrys exposure as well. > I had progressed from actively healthy to head-bobbling, drooling, > and unable to bathe myself. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 To All: You have missed my point. Secondly, toxins in general, have half-lives in the circulation. All of the tests on were done many months following exposure. Thus, if blood or urine tests were done for toxins they would have been missed. Also, according to the family no testing was done on the environment in which the girls played, i.e. ponds and lakes. Also, no air testing was done with respect to toxins in the outdoor air. Thus, I caution all to not point fingers at the MOLD and BACTTERIA and their by -products that are present in water damaged environments until all data are present. I dscussed the potential environmental problems with the girl's parents when the saw Dr. . I suggest that you become familiar with the problems created by exposure to pesticides, aromatic solvents, chlorinated solvens, hydrogen suflide, and the myriad of other chemicals that maybe present in such an environment in which these girls were raised and played. I am not denying the potential neurological problems caused by mycotoxins, but in this case we must be cautious and be aware of the enviornment surrounding these girls in addition to the mold. I will give you another example. Kaiser Hospital in Downey, California was constucted on an EPA priority site. The land originally was owned by JPL. The land underwent some remediation, but still contains toxins from JPL activity. The building also has mold. Workers in the building have become ill. Now you tell me, which has made the the occupants ill: Mold, bacteria and their by-products, the JPL toxins or both? Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D. Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D. Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist www.drthrasher.org toxicologist1@... Off: 530--644-6035 Cell - 575-937-1150 L. Crawley, M.ED., LADC Trauma Specialist sandracrawley@... 530-644-6035 - Off 775-309-3994 - Cell This message and any attachments forwarded with it is to be considered privileged and confidential. The forwarding or redistribution of this message (and any attachments) without my prior written consent is strictly prohibited and may violate privacy laws. Once the intended purpose of this message has been served, please destroy the original message contents. If you have received this message in error, please reply immediately to advise the sender of the miscommunication and then delete the message and any copies you have printed. Thank you in advance for your compliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 I can see this makes figuring out what did damage difficult, if not impossible in some circumstances as I can see situations in which there are a great number of contaminates and if you measured each one, none may raise concern but when you put them all together, you have a high percent of air being breathed in that is " unhealthy " and that brings the percent of healthy air very low, so a combination of things would be the hardest to resolve, which brings to mind the other subject discussed here often of leaving or not leaving some place. If you realize it is the environment, as you feel better elsewhere and done a reasonable search to find source and not been able to, moving may be the only answer. > > To All: You have missed my point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 I don't think everyone has missed your point. I pointed to a neurological institute that frankly, does not deal with mold related problems. It deals with difficult neurological problems and diagnosis. What, in your opinion, do you think the family wants? Sympathy, or solutions? Obvously a group cannot give solutions we are not doctors. --- In , " Jack Thrasher, Ph.D. " <toxicologist1@...> wrote: > > To All: You have missed my point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 Whats sad is some of the best research for fungal has come from the Mayo! K semco_semco_semco <semco_semco_semco@...> wrote: They did all types of toxin testing, I don't know which was related water damaged buildings, probably none. It would lead to mold. MAYO does NOT treat environmental medicine... PERIOD. They do not test for mold toxins. They do not treat mold exposed patients. PERIOD. > > The Mayo clinic did every test for toxins from water damaged buidling > EXCEPT for mold?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 Seems like it might be a little to late to prove what all caused the illness. so all we can offer is things to try that might help. I dont think anyone is trying to blame it all on mold, why would they? I don't think anyone here is stupied about other types of toxin exposures either. > > To All: You have missed my point. Secondly, toxins in general, have half-lives in the circulation. All of the tests on were done many months following exposure. Thus, if blood or urine tests were done for toxins they would have been missed. Also, according to the family no testing was done on the environment in which the girls played, i.e. ponds and lakes. Also, no air testing was done with respect to toxins in the outdoor air. Thus, I caution all to not point fingers at the MOLD and BACTTERIA and their by -products that are present in water damaged environments until all data are present. I dscussed the potential environmental problems with the girl's parents when the saw Dr. . I suggest that you become familiar with the problems created by exposure to pesticides, aromatic solvents, chlorinated solvens, hydrogen suflide, and the myriad of other chemicals that maybe present in such an environment in which these girls were raised and played. I am not denying the potential neurological problems caused by mycotoxins, but in this case we must be cautious and be aware of the enviornment surrounding these girls in addition to the mold. > > I will give you another example. Kaiser Hospital in Downey, California was constucted on an EPA priority site. The land originally was owned by JPL. The land underwent some remediation, but still contains toxins from JPL activity. The building also has mold. Workers in the building have become ill. Now you tell me, which has made the the occupants ill: Mold, bacteria and their by- products, the JPL toxins or both? Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D. > > > Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D. > Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist > www.drthrasher.org > toxicologist1@... > Off: 530--644-6035 > Cell - 575-937-1150 > > > L. Crawley, M.ED., LADC > Trauma Specialist > sandracrawley@... > 530-644-6035 - Off > 775-309-3994 - Cell > > > > > This message and any attachments forwarded with it is to be considered privileged and confidential. The forwarding or redistribution of this message (and any attachments) without my prior written consent is strictly prohibited and may violate privacy laws. Once the intended purpose of this message has been served, please destroy the original message contents. If you have received this message in error, please reply immediately to advise the sender of the miscommunication and then delete the message and any copies you have printed. Thank you in advance for your compliance. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 Hi Dr. Thrasher, This leads to a question that I've been considering for a while. I'm glad to have a chance to ask it. There is at least some evidence that not only can satratoxins (toxins made by stachybotrys) penetrate the blood-brain barrier, but that they can increase its permeability to other substances. For instance, here is a paper that investigates this phenomenon: http://dspace.lib.ttu.edu/bitstream/handle/2346/1269/Karunasena_Enusha_Diss.pdf?\ sequence=1 One hypothesis stemming from this finding seems to be that this increased permeability allows a variety of other chemicals (including ordinary household chemicals like air " fresheners " ) to get into the brain and cause damage, thus leading to Multiple Chemical Sensitivity. The question that I have for you is: Do other chemicals also increase the permeability of the blood-brain barrier (rather than just penetrating it themselves, as it seems may be the case with formaldehyde)? If not, then it seems that one could make an argument that even if a variety of chemicals are present in a water-damaged building, there is something special about stachybotrys mycotoxins that make them more " causative " for at least certain subsequent problems experienced by " Sick Building Syndrome " sufferers. Are there indeed other chemicals that are thought or proven to increase the permeability of the blood-brain barrier? If so, which ones are they? Thanks much! Best, > > I will give you another example. Kaiser Hospital in Downey, California was constucted on an EPA priority site. The land originally was owned by JPL. The land underwent some remediation, but still contains toxins from JPL activity. The building also has mold. Workers in the building have become ill. Now you tell me, which has made the the occupants ill: Mold, bacteria and their by-products, the JPL toxins or both? Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 I'm not a doctor but it's my understanding that many toxins or maybe any toxin in high amounts can cause vasculitis damageing the BBB and or meningitis also allowing toxins into the brain and also damage the olfactory bulbs and tracts which aren't classified as a BB but maybe should be. I know a man who got MCS from exposure to chemicals ar work, but I dont know what all chemicals he was exposed to. > > > > I will give you another example. Kaiser Hospital in Downey, > California was constucted on an EPA priority site. The land > originally was owned by JPL. The land underwent some remediation, but > still contains toxins from JPL activity. The building also has mold. > Workers in the building have become ill. Now you tell me, which has > made the the occupants ill: Mold, bacteria and their by-products, the > JPL toxins or both? Jack D. Thrasher, Ph.D. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2008 Report Share Posted December 28, 2008 --- In , " slayadragon " <slayadragon@...> wrote: > Are there indeed other chemicals that are thought or proven to > increase the permeability of the blood-brain barrier? -------------------------------------- Hi , The causation of brain injury by chemicals is nothing new to science. It is quite well documented and independent of mold sciences. Remember the cocktail effect, in which simultaneous exposure to chemicals leads to synergistic effects (not just additive). Chemicals poison not just through direct damage to organs and tissues, but also in the way they interfere in biochemistry as catalysts. When depleting the body of needed substances (e.g. nutrient loss as in solvent induced anemia) or depriving the body of single essential functions (e.g.acetylcholinesterase from pesticides), you interfere in multiple body functions causing multisystem failure. On top of that, you have inflammatory reactions which instigates a lot of disease conditions over time. I picture this as three distinct layers of damage. The Gulf War research by Dr. Abou-Donia, demonstrated the ease with which multiple chemicals penetrate the blood brain barrier with much greater ease than single chemical exposures. Add physiological stress (induced exercise and other traumas) and it gets even easier. In our society, the fact that exposures are generally unknown to bystanders leads to a lack of proper diagnostic information. Guesswork is useless after the initiating trauma is well hidden from the passage of time. The refusal by public agencies to test marginal or suspect environments; lack of disclosure requirements for product ingredients; lack of disclosure in the applications of chemicals by landlords, employers, farmers (yes, they do not have to disclose the use of many pesticides to their communities);lack of study regarding the persistence of chemicals post-application.... A recipe for destruction which is what we are seeing in the illness statistics and health care cost explosion. So many sick, so few solutions since the causation goes unreported. Damaged people will certainly be more vulnerable to the effects of microbial illness. Barb Rubin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2008 Report Share Posted December 28, 2008 Also not forgetting that bacteria might be involved also as she tested positive for bartonella and lyme disease. Dr. Jernigan's Hansa Center might also be a good option since they seem to thrive on difficult cases others can't figure out. But then I gave 's uncle Mike information on that. http://www.hansacenter.com/ V > > I can see this makes figuring out what did damage difficult, if not > impossible in some circumstances as I can see situations in which there > are a great number of contaminates and if you measured each one, none Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2008 Report Share Posted December 28, 2008 just for the record, I took a look at the barrow institute website, & typed in the name of my " rare " neurological illness. its not even on their website! V. From: <brianc8452@...> Subject: Re: [] Re:Why is paralyzed? Date: Thursday, December 25, 2008, 4:02 PM Thanks. I sent your suggestion to the family. ____________ _________ _________ __ From: semco_semco_ semco <semco_semco_ semco (DOT) com> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 7:24:15 PM Subject: [] Re:Why is paralyzed? Have they contacted the Barrow Institute in Phoenix??? www.thebarrow. org This place is worth a look at. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.