Guest guest Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 As cited on GoozNews.com Health Care Marketplace | New England Journal of MedicineAlters Policies In Response to Complaints Over Conflicts of Interest [Jan 09, 2009] The New England Journal of Medicine changed its procedures regarding conflict of interest disclosures after a letter by the_Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education_ (http://www.accme.org/) criticized the publication for not disclosing a study author's financial conflicts of interest, the _New York Times_ (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/09/us/09journal.html?partner=rss & emc=rss) reports. The study in question was conducted in 2006 by Henschke of _Weill Cornell Medical College_ (http://www.med.cornell.edu/) . The study found that widespread use of CT scans could prevent 80% of lung cancer deaths. According to the Times, the study did not disclose that Henschke's work was funded in part by a $3.6 million grant from the parent company of the _Liggett Group_ (http://www.liggettvectorbrands.com/) , a cigarette maker. NEJM editors said they were unaware of the connection. Henschke did disclose to NEJM that she and her university had licensed a CT-related patent to _General Electric_ (http://www.ge.com/) , a maker of CT scanners, but NEJM decided not to disclose that information to readers. In a letter published in The Cancer Letter, a cancer research newsletter, the Accreditation Council wrote that NEJM and its publisher, the _Massachusetts Medical Society_ (http://www.massmed.org/) , were wrong by failing to disclose " relevant financial conflicts of interests of the authors. " The council is responsible for accrediting educational efforts by NEJM, in which physicians can receive continuing education credits for reading published studies and answering related questions. In a response letter dated Oct. 1, 2008, NEJM officials wrote, " When we published Dr. Henschke's article in 2006 it was not routine NEJM editorial policy to publish details about pending patents, " adding, " Since that time our thinking on this issue has evolved. " According to the Times, NEJM now asks authors to disclose all patents or royalties related to research and publishes that information with studies (, New York Times, 1/9). Sharon Noonan Kramer **************New year...new news. Be the first to know what is making headlines. (http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000026) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.