re testing stuff in storage

[Guest guest]

FYI - re Dr Hooper, the urine test is actually $950 for one urine test

now! We just had one done...waiting for results, but it's definitely

quite expensive so hoping it's worth it!

Jill

[Guest guest]

It tests for three different toxins though but still it is expensive. I had one

and was disappointed it came out negative BECAUSE it was 950.00, but I was out

of building by then. You can test for ONE suspected toxin for 350.00. Dr Rae

wants me to do another one because ochratoxin was found in pancreatic cyst but I

just can't bear to put the money for it up again!

>

> FYI - re Dr Hooper, the urine test is actually $950 for one urine test

> now! We just had one done...waiting for results, but it's definitely

> quite expensive so hoping it's worth it!

>

> Jill

>

[Guest guest]

---

If you are doing the tricothecene urine test, the report just reads PRESENT or

NOT PRESENT. I had Dr. Hooper do that test, and I didnt see the point in

spending the money. If you know you were exposed the PRESENT isnt really telling

you anything you dont already know. Unless you have a legal matter and need

prrf, that would be different.

In , " barb1283 " <barb1283@...> wrote:

>

> It tests for three different toxins though but still it is expensive. I had

one and was disappointed it came out negative BECAUSE it was 950.00, but I was

out of building by then. You can test for ONE suspected toxin for 350.00. Dr

Rae wants me to do another one because ochratoxin was found in pancreatic cyst

but I just can't bear to put the money for it up again!

>

>

> >

> > FYI - re Dr Hooper, the urine test is actually $950 for one urine test

> > now! We just had one done...waiting for results, but it's definitely

> > quite expensive so hoping it's worth it!

> >

> > Jill

> >

>

[Guest guest]

The first time my urine was tested was from Dr Croft and he has you send an

entire whole days collection and gives you a 'quantity count'. Mine was

relatively high, so that was some important information. He only tests for one

toxin, tricothecenes, and as it turns out my house still had a problem and I

didn't realize it. However I've made alot of repairs to house and problem is

not high but still not as good as I need it to be for me, now that I am sick.

Before I knew about problem I was sofa-bound. Now I can function but minimally.

>

> ---

> If you are doing the tricothecene urine test, the report just reads PRESENT or

NOT PRESENT. I had Dr. Hooper do that test, and I didnt see the point in

spending the money. If you know you were exposed the PRESENT isnt really telling

you anything you dont already know. Unless you have a legal matter and need

prrf, that would be different.

>