Guest guest Posted February 28, 2009 Report Share Posted February 28, 2009 When did he move out of house? Has he had time to recover from exposure? I think Trump eventually paid the mortgage on his house or backed it as an act of charity and friend. Is house still empty? > > A close friend and past co-worker of Ed McMahon says he believes mold in > McMahon's home is the reason why he has cancer. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 ALL: Cancer; Ed McMahon causation answer: Yes. For reasons way above and beyond current medical thought or analysis, I have learned to place absolute trust in A.V. Constantini, M.D., who throughout my 22 years now in Molecular Science studies, and 10 years now focused on dedicated studies in Medical Mycology, Environmental Sciences, Cellular Evolution, and other sciences, has demonstrated clearly that he is a " master's master " in the study of molds and mycotoxins in the process of human diseases. Everytime I have investigated to correlate or confirm what this man wrote and investigated over his lifetime, as it was with my friend A. Marinkovich, M.D. (deceased), it either is confirmed or has been substantiated more recently by the Molecular Sciences as of late. I encourage all of you to read about this great doctor who wrote the orignal " Fungalbionics " while a professor at the University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco. Go to:http://www.njmoldinspection.com/fungalbionics.html For document research also: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed & Cmd=Search & Term=%22Costantini\ %20AV%22%5BAuthor%5D & itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubm\ ed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus On Google: type " AV Costantini M.D. Fungalbionics " Have a Blessed day. Doug Haney Environmental-Health Projects Email: _Haney52@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 Don't know about Ed McMahon, but there is an Italian doctor named Simoncini who says that fungal infections cause mold. He says that he has cured cancer with baking soda in water. Baking soda is a known anti-fungal agent. > > ALL: > > Cancer; Ed McMahon causation answer: Yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 I looked up Fungalbionics. I read about this before. I found it at mold_survivor site, so it is not a book, but an article? I couldn't find it as book anywhere but the length of it looks book length. Which reminds me Simoncini, Italian oncologist, that wrote " Cancer is a Fungus " , book used to be available at Amazon.com, paperback, reasonable price and I bought and gave it to my doctor. Now I see it is not available except for hardback covered used for about 70.00. This book should be selling, not unavailable!!! > > ALL: > > Cancer; Ed McMahon causation answer: Yes. > > For reasons way above and beyond current medical thought or analysis, I have learned to place absolute trust in A.V. Constantini, M.D., Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 From my reading, it says " Fungalbionics " was a series of books. I can't find them anywhere!!! > > I looked up Fungalbionics. I read about this before. I found it at > mold_survivor site, so it is not a book, but an article? I couldn't > find it as book anywhere but the length of it looks book length. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 Okay, I found where I can buy them from Germany, through the mold website information, very limited editions, not from bookstores. I haven't checked the library yet. It's probably pretty pricey because it says it's a series of four books. > > From my reading, it says " Fungalbionics " was a series of books. I > can't find them anywhere!!! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 I going to be a devil's advocate here and say that I think for some cancers that are fueled by hormone production this is not the case. As a carrier of the BRCA2 gene mutation that causes hormone receptor positive tumors in women who present with cancer I think the suppression of our hormones through low MSH has a protective effect. It was recommended that I have my breasts removed, a bi-lateral oophorectomy and a total hysterectomy. It was recommended that if I didn't do this to go on tamoxifen, a drug that suppresses estrogen production. Recently I was diagnosed with another autoimmune disorder that is directly related to low estrogen and testosterone so my theory is that for the cancers I am at high risk for and being exposed to mold had a protective effect. I asked my oncologist when I only had Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency what he thought about my theory and he said that the adrenals are only responsible for producing a small amount of our needs for estrogen. I wonder what he will say now that I have an autoimmune disorder related to low estrogen and testosterone. Sharon H. > > > RadarOnline.com Exclusive > > > Did Mold Cause Ed McMahon's Cancer? > > > > > A close friend and past co-worker of Ed McMahon says he believes mold in > McMahon's home is the reason why he has cancer. > > Schlatter, producer of the legendary '60's comedy show " Laugh In , " > spoke exclusively with RadarOnline.com about his dear friend, Ed McMahon. > > As RadarOnline.com reported earlier today, the 85-year old McMahon has been > in the hospital for nearly a month. The famed announcer is in serious > condition with pneumonia, according to his rep. > But Entertainment Tonight is reporting that Ed is suffering from bone > cancer. > Schlatter says he's been trying to reach out to Ed's wife Pam to see what's > happening with him. > Schlatter tells RadarOnline.com: " The last time I saw Ed was at the Carousel > of Hope (the Barbara charity event in Beverly Hills). I was talking to > him at least once a week and, since I hadn't heard from him in awhile, I > became a little worried about him. He had a whole bunch of problems weighing him > down--the house foreclosure and his ongoing battle with the insurance company > over his mold case. " They took mold in the house and they painted over it! > They just scraped it and painted over it, which disturbed it further--made it > more toxic! I believe that the mold may have something to do with his cancer > and other medical problems. It's very possible! " > Many medical experts say that prolonged exposure to mold can cause illness > and even death. > Keep checking RadarOnline.com for breaking developments in the Ed McMahon > story > > > > **************You're invited to Hollywood's biggest party: Get s > updates, red carpet pics and more at Moviefone. > (http://movies.aol.com/oscars-academy-awards? ncid=emlcntusmovi00000001) > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 If estrogen caused cancer, you would think the highest incidents of it would be in very young women, when they have the highest amount, rather than we get older and have less. My doctor, who is OB/GYNE who does alternative medicine and natural hormone therapy, says it isn't the amount of estrogen but that it gets out of balance to progesterone. As we age, the major hormone we lose is progesterone, as in 'pro -gest', or pro gestation, from our ovaries. That plummets, leaving estrogen higher relative to the progesterone. We may not want or should have progesterone levels high as when we were young, but high enough to offset the estrogen that is left there without it's natural counterpart. If you haven't already, I wouldn't let them take out all those organs and throw them away as causing the trouble. Just my opinion. Go to: http://www.power-surge.com/ and read up on your hormones and what you can do to be healthier. A healthy body has less chance of getting sick. > > I going to be a devil's advocate here and say that I think for some > cancers that are fueled by hormone production this is not the case. > As a carrier of the BRCA2 gene mutation that causes hormone receptor > positive tumors in women who present with cancer I think the > suppression of our hormones through low MSH has a protective effect. > It was recommended that I have my breasts removed, a bi-lateral > oophorectomy and a total hysterectomy. It was recommended that if I > didn't do this to go on tamoxifen, a drug that suppresses estrogen > production. Recently I was diagnosed with another autoimmune disorder > that is directly related to low estrogen and testosterone so my > theory is that for the cancers I am at high risk for and being > exposed to mold had a protective effect. > > I asked my oncologist when I only had Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency > what he thought about my theory and he said that the adrenals are > only responsible for producing a small amount of our needs for > estrogen. I wonder what he will say now that I have an autoimmune > disorder related to low estrogen and testosterone. > > Sharon H. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 Sharon H, How do you think mold had a protective affect on cancer? I'm not challenging you, just would like to understand what the theory is. Thanks, Barb > that is directly related to low estrogen and testosterone so my > theory is that for the cancers I am at high risk for and being > exposed to mold had a protective effect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 Read what Doug Haney posted, Fungalbionics and their theory on the concept of 'autoimmune diseases'. They are three doctors who were head of World Health Organization, who devoted research to this. > >Recently I was diagnosed with another autoimmune disorder > that is directly related to low estrogen and testosterone so my > theory is that for the cancers I am at high risk for and being > exposed to mold had a protective effect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 Barb thanks for your question. This is just my humble opinion and I don't know for sure, it's a theory. Most women who have the BRCA2 gene mutation have had cancer by my age. I am 52. My sister after taking high dose estrogen birth control pills and who also has the gene mutation had cancer at 34. If you research the two mutations and you have to have a mutation you would want the BRCA2. This is because women who present with cancer with the BRCA2 present with tumors that are estrogen positive or hormone receptor positive. Tumors that are hormone receptor positive are associated with a BETTER prognosis. Women with the BRCA1 gene mutation present with tumors that are hormone receptor negative. This is associated with a WORSE prognosis should you get cancer. My doctors have this knowledge. They know that estrogen is my enemy but should I get cancer it would be easier to treat and would be less likely to recur for me than women who have tumors that are hormone receptor negative. I'm talking percentages here based on studies. The recommendations I received from numerous doctors and two oncologists are to get my breasts removed and get a bi-lateral oophorectomy and a hysterectomy. If I don't do either of these things they recommend that I go on tamoxifen for five years to suppress my estrogen production because estrogen is my enemy according to them. I did neither of these things but I did get exposed to mold in my forties. Because I now have an autoimmune disorder that specifically means I have low estrogen and testosterone levels I believe this worked much like how the tamoxifen would work; it suppressed my estrogen. I ran it by a few of my doctors but they don't want to say I'm right because they think I'm nuts not to have the surgery or to go on the tomoxifen. But they had to concede that the theory made sense. > > Sharon H, How do you think mold had a protective affect on cancer? I'm > not challenging you, just would like to understand what the theory is. > Thanks, Barb > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 I think you have a point there Barb but we are not just exposed to the estrogen our bodies produce. We are bombarded with hormones in our drinking water and the foods we eat. That's why I have gone organic when I can. And this is why I believe a lot of women are getting breast cancer earlier even ones without the gene mutation. I believe in science but I am jaded and I also believe in holistic treatments. I depend on both and I keep my choices open. I have refused the surgery many times and I will continue to do so. In any case Barb you are preaching to the choir. Let's see these are the books I have read. Women's Bodies Women's Wisdom Wisdom in Menopause Women Who Run with the Wolves (great stories) Survival of the Sickest (Informative, entertaining and fascinating) Our Bodies Our Selves (I have had every issue) When I lived in Maine I went to Women to Women so I am familiar with holistic medicine. I also was treated by Dr. Kolb who is Chairman of the Board of Holistic Doctors I believe. I still believe in both traditional medicine and holistic medicine. Great discussion Barb, I appreciate your feed back. Sharon H. " If estrogen caused cancer, you would think the highest incidents of it would be in very young women, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 Well, I hope everything turns out okay. > > I think you have a point there Barb but we are not just exposed to > the estrogen our bodies produce. We are bombarded with hormones in > our drinking water and the foods we eat. That's why I have gone > organic when I can. And this is why I believe a lot of women are > getting breast cancer earlier even ones without the gene mutation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 --- I found this thread especially interesting as I have estrogen that is four times what it should be post-menopause and the doctors are blaming my mold exposure on the HIGH estrogen. Is it possible that the levels of estrogen can go in either direction after a mold expoure? It sounded Sharon like you thought your level was low due to the mold. I have been very concerned about cancer with this level being so high and it has been there for four years now. Is is not true that mold poisoning normally causes high estrogen or am I mistaken? Thanks Diane In , " barb1283 " <barb1283@...> wrote: > > Well, I hope everything turns out okay. > > > > > > I think you have a point there Barb but we are not just exposed to > > the estrogen our bodies produce. We are bombarded with hormones in > > our drinking water and the foods we eat. That's why I have gone > > organic when I can. And this is why I believe a lot of women are > > getting breast cancer earlier even ones without the gene mutation. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 Have you considered getting checked for Lyme by a good Lyme doctor who would know how to test or look for symptoms? Many people with Lyme have mold related problems and other issues. Just a thought. I am sorry that you are going through so much. I hope you will find healing. cathy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 My dog who was very sick from mold and extensively tested had double the amount of estrogen a male dog should normally have. > > --- > I found this thread especially interesting as I have estrogen that is > four times what it should be post-menopause and the doctors are blaming > my mold exposure on the HIGH estrogen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 I know this story very well only with my adrenals. I have obvious signs of a Cushings like syndrome (Cushing's disease is associated with too much cortisol production). I have a buffalo hump, swelling around the neck and frontal obesity and yet I am adrenal insufficient. I'm not sure if you have read Shoemaker's work but he says that at first we will produce too much cortisol and then we won't produce enough. This, I believe is also true for estrogen and I believe that I have also produced too much estrogen for my age before I crashed. It's the unregulated state we are in and Shoemaker says it's all about MSH. Mine was less than eight but the normal range is 35-80. Because my hormones were so impacted by my mold exposure I think I've covered it all. The entire range from hyper-thyroid to hypo-thyroid from a Cushing's like syndrome to Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency and now another auto-immune disorder associated with low estrogen and testosterone but my exposure was over a five year period and it was colonized inside my body inside my breast and then I was exposed to a sick building. I don't know of anyone else exposed to mold that has been hit so hard hormonally but I'll gladly pass the torch if someone wants to take it. > > My dog who was very sick from mold and extensively tested had double > the amount of estrogen a male dog should normally have. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 I had MSH of 8 also or less than 8. I think if reads <8. Dr Shoemaker said he feels I have been over exposed to mold much longer than dates I gave him. > I have also produced too much estrogen for my age before I crashed. It's the unregulated state we are in and Shoemaker says it's all about MSH. Mine was less than eight but the normal range is 35-80. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 Yep that's about as low as you can go. I can truly empathize with you. By the way I am working again and with the help of hormones I am functioning again. But with this new diagnosis I wonder what is going on. Am I being exposed again? I'm also getting shocks on a regular basis again. Sharon H. > > > I have also produced too much estrogen for my age before I crashed. It's the unregulated state we are in and Shoemaker says it's all about MSH. Mine was less than eight but the normal range is 35-80. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 I have had cancer too, and will answer your email on that separately. What do you mean by shocks...from your nerves, or like 'winter time, dry air' shocks? > > Yep that's about as low as you can go. I can truly empathize with you. > > By the way I am working again and with the help of hormones I am functioning again. But with this new diagnosis I wonder what is going on. Am I being exposed again? I'm also getting shocks on a regular basis again. > > Sharon H. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.