Guest guest Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 That is really a good, simple definition. It helps to explain why the defense digs and digs. It also help to explain why they will twist things to infer unclean hands, whether that is correct or not. So my point is, since plaintiff attorneys get paid on a percentage most times, they will spend more time (not all, some) IF the potential financial return on time invested to fight the implications is greater. You are 100% right, Ginny. The ONLY way we are going to stop what is happening to people over this issue is to change regulations, public perception and mainstream medical awareness. Its hard enough for those that have the means to fight, but the poor stand very little chance under this current system. What is worse, is that some of the attorneys who have gone to bat for the sick and poor have lost cases that should have been won. This has left them with less means to fight another day. The whole situation is tragic on many levels. Sharon In a message dated 2/26/2009 5:32:00 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, ginloi@... writes: I like this definition and explanation as well. Objet: " Clean Hands Doctrine " Defined À: _ginloi@..._ (mailto:ginloi@...) Date: Jeudi 26 Février 2009, 8h07 _http://www.lectlaw.http://www.lehtt_ (http://www.lectlaw.com/def/c202.htm) Sharon Noonan Kramer **************You're invited to Hollywood's biggest party: Get s updates, red carpet pics and more at Moviefone. (http://movies.aol.com/oscars-academy-awards?ncid=emlcntusmovi00000001) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.