Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Tenant Sickened By Mold Awarded $1 Million

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Tenant Sickened By Mold Awarded $1 Million

Disabled Woman Claimed Landlords Ignored Her Complaints

POSTED: 5:50 pm EDT March 18, 2009

UPDATED: 8:23 pm EDT March 18, 2009

Video: Tenant Sickened By Mold Awarded $1 Million

http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/18961264/detail.html

BOSTON -- A civil jury has awarded Helen Herman what amounts to, with interest,

just over $1 million dollars for damages suffered while living at 56 River Road

Rear in Tewksbury four years ago.

Video: Tenant Sickened By Mold Awarded $1 Million

" Although the verdict was awesome, we love it, it doesn't bring back my health, "

said Herman.

Newscenter 5's Amalia Barreda first did a story in March 2005 on a mold problem

in the house they were renting, which Herman claimed was making her sick. She

said her landlords, area developers Sullivan and his father,

Sullivan, ignored her complaints.

At the time, the couple's own mold home testing kit revealed alarming results.

Molds appeared that could trigger debilitating ailments. Severe asthma is among

the things that permanently disabled Herman, and forced her to leave her MBTA

job of 20 years.

" My doctor suggested I leave, and I was devastated, " said Herman.

Herman's husband said all of their possessions were contaminated.

" We wound up throwing everything we owned in the trash, " said Christian

Langlois.

The couple said their complaints to the Sullivans fell on deaf ears. Barreda

reported that over the telephone their attorney told Newscenter 5 they were

" disappointed in the jury verdict. " O'Reilly added, " we do intend to

pursue fully our rights on appeal. "

But Herman's attorneys said the jury heard strong evidence that the Sullivans

repeatedly ignored the mold problem, even after Herman and her husband moved

out.

" They just kept turning it over after slapping on a new coat of paint, " said

attorney Doyle.

The judge has taken a very important matter under advisement, and that is that

under the Consumer Protection Act, the judge could double or even triple the

jury's verdict.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...