Re: Ca Appellate Decision (unpublished) Mold Environmental Hazard

[Guest guest]

This is long and confusing but am I reading it right that the person that got

sick from exposure won in the end? It seems to me that it is explained that way

pretty extensibly.

 

My second question is I wonder why this is unpublished? If I understand that

right it is so that no one else can refer to this judgement in another lawsuit

of the same type. If that be the case, Why???

   

   Sickbuilding Syndrome should be one of your greatest concerns.    

 www.biotoxin.info    

Issued yesterday by the Calif. Court of Appeal (unpublished)

_http://www.courtinf o.ca.gov/ opinions/ nonpub/G039659. PDF_

(http://www.courtinf o.ca.gov/ opinions/ nonpub/G039659. PDF)

************ **Who's never won? Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all

[Guest guest]

Your guess is probably right. Part of a lawsuit settlement with me

over fraud in stock transactions, was that I not mention it to anyone

and it did not go on institutions records. I didn't want to agree but

attorneys advised me to do it, otherwise the suit would be much longer

and probably not get any more compensation since compensation was

actually 100%. So nobody can find out about the fraud committed by the

stockbroker which was a VP of a financial institution that is well

known. That is the way business is frequently done, unfortunately for

the next guy. He did not lose his license to trade which he should

have.

>

My second question is I wonder why this is unpublished? If I

understand that right it is so that no one else can refer to this

judgement in another lawsuit of the same type. If that be the case,

Why???

>