Guest guest Posted January 5, 2008 Report Share Posted January 5, 2008 I don't entirely trust Dr. Vliet's opinions. She uses a lot of emotional arguments and fear tactics that imply way more than the opinion pieces of the international menopause society that she recommends. For technical details on hormone usage, she is probably a good source of information. However, she also recommends yearly mammograms. Mammograms are implicated as a cause (perhaps leading) of breast cancer. http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/PBC/ Dr. Gofman was a mainstream radiation scientist through most of his career. Karima > > Did you guys know that she has a podcast? http://www.blogtalkradio.com/drvliet/2007/12/18/Dr-Vliets-Savvy-Womans-Health-Gu\ ide > > > B. > www.naturalthyroidchoices.com > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2008 Report Share Posted January 5, 2008 She makes some very powerful points, and then I go to the sources such as the international menopause society that she recommends. Although the IMS is not exactly unbiased themselves, as their awards are sponsored by various pharmaceutical companies such Bayer. They are still very careful about how they describe both the benefits and risks of hormone use. There is so much to read and study on the subject of hormones. I have been putting in hours and hours of reading the various arguments put forward by the cheerleaders and naysayers for hormone supplementation. There is so much to read and I change my mind every day on some aspect of the subject. I am fast becoming very skeptical of anything said about hormones. It is such a loaded topic. And I now trace back and read the references that are used. Try to understand the studies that are used to support arguments. Very often the same studies are used for both sides of an argument. Brings to mind the public affairs saying, " figures lie and lier's figure. " I do think that Vliet makes some good points, but that doesn't mean I accept her opinions on women's health. But when commenting on technical details of hormone usage, she probably has the clinical experience to offer very good advice. The National Women's Health Network offers some great analysis of women's health issues from a feminist, evidence based perspective, but I don't accept a lot of their stances on health matters either. And they are non profit unlike Dr. Vliet. And of course, everyone nowadays claims to be evidence based, and practically saint-like in their efforts to assist women, particularly menopausal ones with annoying hot flashes! Karima > > > > Did you guys know that she has a podcast? > http://www.blogtalkradio.com/drvliet/2007/12/18/Dr-Vliets-Savvy-Womans-Health-Gu\ ide > > > > > > B. > > www.naturalthyroidchoices.com > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2008 Report Share Posted January 7, 2008 I saw Vliet. I loved her books found that most of what she said made sense and since I was a " special " case, pulled my money together and went out to see her. Anyone following this board will have a rudimentary understanding of my issues (Graves/Hashimoto's, elevated androgens, etc.). I am really no better off and have decided to pursue other avenues of healing for right now. Will be glad to go into detail through PM with anybody interested. Avi > > > > > > Did you guys know that she has a podcast? > > > http://www.blogtalkradio.com/drvliet/2007/12/18/Dr-Vliets-Savvy- Womans-Health-Guide > > > > > > > > > B. > > > www.naturalthyroidchoices.com > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.