Re: further exploration of high vit D cautions, Marshall Protocol, sun exposure

[Guest guest]

Hi,

I read through the links and read multiple posts on the Marshall

Protocol list. One disturbing thing is that the people who do the

protocol are instructed to wean off their adrenal support. I went off

my adrenal support for two weeks to do my saliva test and it was no

fun at all. I had trouble sleeping and my shoulder problem got so

much worse. I think I have mild adrenal issues. I cannot even

imagine how bad it would be to go off adrenal support with a severe

adrenal problem.

Also, I read information that lead me to believe that Marshal Protocol

people do not understand cortef and prednisone. For instance one

post that I read said that 15 mg of cortef can or will shut down your

adrenal glands. They all really need to read Jeffries. I just wonder

if the people on the Marshall Protocol would do so much better if they

were placed on adequate adrenal support during the protocol rather

than going off all cortef and prednisone?

The final thing that I found disturbing was that one of the links

seemed to discount the link between sun exposure and the maps that

show mortality rates for diseases like breast cancer and MS.

I used to live in the fog belt near San Francisco CA. We were very

close to the coast and we had almost no sun. Most every day the fog

would roll in limiting the sun. The joke on the news was that you

could tell who the tourist were because they were the ones wearing

shorts with goose bumps on their legs. I never wore shorts back then

unless I was going inland where it was warm and sunny. Even in the

summer I always had a jacket with me. My husband and I were sick

quite often and needed several courses of antibiotics wile living in

that area. When I see the breast cancer mortality map and the red

area near San Francisco I KNOW it has to have something to do with the

sun.

I also lived in N. Virginia for several years. That map area is

medium pink (more medium breast cancer risk). When I lived there I

wore shorts for a couple of months in the summer but I stayed inside

most of the time because the weather was hot and humid in the summer

time. My husband and I needed multiple courses of antibiotics wile

living in Virginia.

I live in S AZ now, my breast cancer map area is medium dark blue

(less cancer than the red of San Francisco or the pink of N VA). We

have lots of sun here. I wear short for nine months out of the year.

There are only about three months where I have to cover up.

Everyone else here even the older retired men and women wear shorts

and short sleeves also. I have lived here for over seven years.

Neither my husband or I have needed a course of antibiotics since

moving here (knock on wood!). Every year that goes by without a

severe respiratory infection for the both of us amazes me. No sinus

infections, no influenza, no bronchitis, no strep throat, nothing that

we have not been able to get over on our own. Believe me

I used to get more than my fair share of URIs.

The map tells me that it seems very likely that breast cancer

mortality is related to sun exposure. It also seems likely to me that

sun exposure may decrease the incidence of upper respiratory

infections. The Marshal Protocol people may discount the link but I think

they have it wrong. How can I believe what they say if they do not

even understand cortef dosing?

http://dceg.cancer.gov/cgi-bin/atlas/mapview2?direct=breswf70

Kathy

>

> > I think it must be more complex than just a type of vitamin D = bad.

> >

> >

>

>

> Karima...Exactly! Now to put all the pieces together for what works

> well for each person individual biochemistry.

>

> Thanks for the part about the condition of the host....I do think

> that's a key.

>

> Lynn

>