Re: f-165 - duty and pulse

[Guest guest]

Duty refers to the percentage of each frequency cycle when the signal level is

high. Hence " duty 75 " would mean that each cycle is high for 75% and low for 25%

of the time.

Pulse refers to the rate at which frequencies are switched off and on. Pulsing

enhances effectiveness of frequencies. There are two parameters for pulse, pulse

frequency and pulse duty. " Pulse 64 75 " means pulse at the rate of 64

times/second, and run the frequencies for 75% of the time for each pulse.

Some generally useful frequency program parameters are...

dwell 180

duty 75

pulse 64 75

The pulse rate should be less than the frequencies being run.

Can anyone tell me what duty and pulse are used for in an F-165?

[Guest guest]

thank you Warren,

I have seen some use pulse 6.66 66.6

is any discussion on WHY you would use a specific pulse and duty?

I keep hearing that you should do 3 minutes for each frequency to get

any kind of affect.

so I understand the dwell 180.

but short of me just using your suggestions, which I will naturally anyways.

why would I?

I'm just trying to wrap my mind around this now that i have the f-165

and a magnetic pad to do the healing..

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Warren Rekow

wrote:

>

>

>

> Duty refers to the percentage of each frequency cycle when the signal level is

high. Hence " duty 75 " would mean that each cycle is high for 75% and low for 25%

of the time.

>

> Pulse refers to the rate at which frequencies are switched off and on. Pulsing

enhances effectiveness of frequencies. There are two parameters for pulse, pulse

frequency and pulse duty. " Pulse 64 75 " means pulse at the rate of 64

times/second, and run the frequencies for 75% of the time for each pulse.

>

> Some generally useful frequency program parameters are...

> dwell 180

> duty 75

> pulse 64 75

>

> The pulse rate should be less than the frequencies being run.

>

>

>

>

>

> Can anyone tell me what duty and pulse are used for in an F-165?

>

>

--

damn it feels good to be a peaceman

http://soundcloud.com/mcguire-1/damn-it-feels-good-to-be-a

[Guest guest]

There are no empirical studies defining the most effective pulse parameters that

I know of. It would not be surprising if the most effective pulse settings vary

with the equipment, person, ailment etc. It may be helpful to set up the

parameters such that each pulse outputs at least a few cycles where cycles per

pulse = (frequency/pulse rate) * pulse duty. Normally I do not pulse frequencies

less than 100Hz. It is not a satisfying answer, but your own experience may be

your best guide.

thank you Warren,

I have seen some use pulse 6.66 66.6

is any discussion on WHY you would use a specific pulse and duty?

I keep hearing that you should do 3 minutes for each frequency to get

any kind of affect.

so I understand the dwell 180.

but short of me just using your suggestions, which I will naturally anyways.

why would I?

I'm just trying to wrap my mind around this now that i have the f-165

and a magnetic pad to do the healing..

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Warren Rekow

wrote:

>

>

>

> Duty refers to the percentage of each frequency cycle when the signal level is

high. Hence " duty 75 " would mean that each cycle is high for 75% and low for 25%

of the time.

>

> Pulse refers to the rate at which frequencies are switched off and on. Pulsing

enhances effectiveness of frequencies. There are two parameters for pulse, pulse

frequency and pulse duty. " Pulse 64 75 " means pulse at the rate of 64

times/second, and run the frequencies for 75% of the time for each pulse.

>

> Some generally useful frequency program parameters are...

> dwell 180

> duty 75

> pulse 64 75

>

> The pulse rate should be less than the frequencies being run.

>

>

>

>

>

> Can anyone tell me what duty and pulse are used for in an F-165?

>

[Guest guest]

We like to use the fuzz function. When that is used, it does not make

sense to use pulse at the same time as the signal would be off during

part of the fuzz/sweep.

http://www.royalrife.com

>

> There are no empirical studies defining the most effective pulse

> parameters that I know of. It would not be surprising if the most

> effective pulse settings vary with the equipment, person, ailment etc.

> It may be helpful to set up the parameters such that each pulse

> outputs at least a few cycles where cycles per pulse =

> (frequency/pulse rate) * pulse duty. Normally I do not pulse

> frequencies less than 100Hz. It is not a satisfying answer, but your

> own experience may be your best guide.

>

> O

>

[Guest guest]

Yes, I often use fuzz too, commonly with a setting of fuzz 2 0.1, with the

intent being to encompass variations such as microbe frequency sensitivity,

potential machine variability, person sensitivity, etc. The " ideal " most

effective frequency in any situation may include some fractional Hz value rather

than always being an integer value, or it may span a limited range, so fuzz may

help to target that ideal frequency.

Often I run pulse and fuzz concurrently (using a Rife/Bare machine) and have had

good results doing so. Perhaps the benefit of pulsing generally offsets any loss

of benefit from the signal off time? If you have tried using pulse and fuzz both

together and separately then it would be interesting to learn what differences

in results were observed under given conditions.

We like to use the fuzz function. When that is used, it does not make

sense to use pulse at the same time as the signal would be off during

part of the fuzz/sweep.

http://www.royalrife.com

>

> There are no empirical studies defining the most effective pulse

> parameters that I know of. It would not be surprising if the most

> effective pulse settings vary with the equipment, person, ailment etc.

> It may be helpful to set up the parameters such that each pulse

> outputs at least a few cycles where cycles per pulse =

> (frequency/pulse rate) * pulse duty. Normally I do not pulse

> frequencies less than 100Hz. It is not a satisfying answer, but your

> own experience may be your best guide.

>