Questions

[Guest guest]

Hi Everyone,

These past few years has seen the publication of “ A History of Rife’s

Instruments and Frequencies” , authored by Jeff Garff. Jeff has done a

remarkable job in chasing down Rife history and made some great

discoveries about the original Rife instruments. However, I believe that

there are problems with some of the premises presented within this

document, and wish to constructively discuss a few of these

..

There are enough early Rife instruments and documentation about

that we know quite a bit about them. Just for starters - lets take a

sentence from Dr. Rife - that has been used by Jeff in his paper.

RIFE: “You know we had an idea when we had our Clinic in La Jolla,

of course that was battery and motor generator operated that

set "

In other words, batteries were used to drive an electric motor that then

turned an AC generator. These generators were commonly found in three AC

hz configurations. There was 60 hz of course, but more common was

500 hz and 240 hz. I haven’t looked into this basic fact, but perhaps

someone might. The AC current frequency may be of some

significance.

A good discussion of motor generators can be found in this book on Google

From Google Books.... " Practical Wireless Telegraphy

" .

http://books.google.com/books?id=DI9RAAAAMAAJ & pg=PA64 & lpg=PA64 & dq=wireless+motor+generator & source=bl & ots=fwQOtK2syY & sig=4XCsb5R1UFe0wS-T5-v5KVAeahc & hl=en & sa=X & ei=IaAZUMDrFO3piQLX74DoBQ & ved=0CF4Q6AEwAg#v=onepage & q=wireless%20motor%20generator & f=false

Page 51 starts a whole chapter on the use of

motor generators.

A big question that I have has to do with the original Rife instruments,

which includes those made by Hoyland. I would like to know when

these original Rife instruments began using square wave modulation. The

original 1939 Beam Ray instrument of the Rife UK group produces a wave

form output that can be seen on the link below.

This is the same instrument whose treatment frequencies are being

utilized to calculate sideband frequencies for the MOPA.

http://www.rife.de/scoon_1939_beam_ray_machine.html

This 1939 device utilized sine wave modulation. There is a

built in gate generator to the transmitter whose rate depends upon

the AC power frequency. Although the 1939 Beam Ray used 60 hz AC,

Rife with his earlier use of a Motor Generator might

have used 500hz AC output in his early devices. If the electrical

gate configuration was somewhat similar to the 1939 Beam Ray, 500 hz AC

could produce 500 hz gate rates in Rife’s earlier designs.

One of the discoveries about the original Beam Ray instrument is

crucial, to quote from Aubrey Scoon - “The actual

carrier frequency of the machine depends very much on the plasma tube and

also on coupling effects between the tube and any person in the

vicinity.” To put this more plainly, the actual carrier frequency

of the original Rife Beam Ray instrument was unstable and not fixed.

Which of course would play havoc with the entire premise of using a

specific side band to output a specific stable frequency.The actual

carrier wave of the 1939 Beam Ray device is not a pure sine

wave, so multiple carrier frequencies , some of which are harmonics

, are produced simultaneously. To quote from Mr. Scoon, “Some of

the dominant harmonics have been observed at approximately 2.3 MHz, 4.6

MHz and 9.09 MHz.” Since these are harmonics of the primary carrier

frequency, these harmonics or any of the carrier frequencies

generated, must also vary in frequency ( are unstable ) based upon

the plasma tube and patient. With a different power output tube in the

circuit, the Beam Ray instrument was more stable but the carrier

frequency changed to 4.68 MHz, and still maintained multiple carrier

frequencies in it’s output . The oscilloscope patterns show the multiple

carriers as being modulated as well. So if side bands are being utilized

at a specific frequency, exactly which unstable sideband of which

unstable carrier wave was chosen by Hoyland to hide the treatment

frequency ?

The GB4000/Mopa charts and data and frequencies have been

presented showing sideband formation . The GB 4000 and MOPA use

square waves to modulate and create sidebands. Doesn’t the

historical record point to the exclusive use of sinewave modulation prior

to about 1950 ? Meaning that is how the original Rife

frequencies were created and measured ?

Here is a good question. “ Is a specifically calculated

sideband frequency highly critical to treatment success. “ We know

from Aubrey Scoon’s Beam Ray device that the carrier wave had an unstable

frequency and produced multiple carrier wave frequencies. Can

someone explain why Hoyland would hide the treatment frequency in a

sideband due to a designed in instability of the primary carrier

frequency and the multiple carriers that were produced ? How is it

possible to generate a specific side band frequency in a reliable

manner every time the Beam Ray device was turned on due to the

carrier instability created by interaction with the patient ?

The next topic has to do with carrier frequencies . The FCC has set aside

parts of the radio spectrum for use with what are known as

Industrial, Scientific, and Medical ( ISM) instruments. These

frequencies occur at 6.78 MHz, 13.56 MHz, and 27.12 MHz. Each of the ISM

bands above, are all double the frequency of the one that proceeds it. To

extrapolate downwards a little, ½ of 6.78 MHz is 3.39 MHz about 60 KHz

off the original Beam Ray instrument with a carrier of 3.33 MHz ( which

was unstable and varied) and only 90 KHz off the 3.3 MHz promoted

for the MOPA unit. So why aren’t carrier frequencies in the 3

MHz ranges being used these days ? There is a very good answer to that,

an answer considering the consequences that should be of some concern to

all of us.

The MOPA amplifier with its’ 2.2 MHz to 3.6 MHz carrier

output overlaps the 2.850 MHz to 3.155 MHz Aviation Bands.

Using a MOPA, one is splattering a good portion of these aviation bands

with 180 watts of modulated RF output and with 400+ watt short

duration power spikes. In Canada, 3.33 MHz is used as the National

Research Council Canada time signal. Question.... is RF splattering

of the aircraft bands and a critical government time signal something

that should be encouraged ? Maybe some faraday cages would be

extremely useful here?

3.3 MHz, or close by this frequency , is claimed to be highly

important. But is it really all that important ? Here is a quote

from Dr. Holt’s web site about frequencies below 4 MHz.

http://the-institute.com.au/about-radiowave-therapy/physics-of-radiowaves/

" Radio frequencies below 4 MHz - the body is essentially

transparent to the energy, as the frequency is increased, more energy is

absorbed by the human body “

The technical term for this is SAR or Specific Absorption Rate which

increases with increases in carrier wave frequency. It is why we use

microwaves to cook with, and not HF radio waves. A pertinent

question here is “ If the RF waves emitted by the MOPA are

transparent to the body , are the MOPA’s sidebands

capable of being demodulated by the body ?

An item of interest. Holt’s use of 434 MHz is significant, this is

an ISM band frequency, and 434 MHz is exactly 16 times the

ISM frequency of 27.125 MHz. Going back to the lower MHz ISM bands of

6.78, 13.56 and 27.12 there is a harmonic ratio between these.

13.56 MHz is double 6.78 and 27.12 MHz is 4 times 6.78. All musical

harmonic ratios i.e. 2, 4, 8, 16 and so on . If one were to start with

3.39 MHz. The harmonics would once again be double the frequency of the

preceding band.

Some basic science about Amplitude Modulation :

At 100 % modulation only about 1/3 of the total power of the amplifier is

available for the side bands. A device with 120 watts of carrier power,

when 100 % Amplitude Modulated ( AM ) - a modulation ratio of 1 -

,will have a power output envelope of 180 watts. The formula for

this is :

Pr = Pc ( 1 +

[m2/2] )

Where:

Pr is the Power of the modulated carrier

Pc is the unmodulated r Power

M is the modulation factor ( 100 % modulation = 1 ) As

another example, 70% modulation produces a modulation factor

of 0.7

In such a situation the total power available to all the sidebands

is 1/3 or in this case 60 watts. It is important to remember that the

sidebands hold all the actual information ( signal data ) and it is

the sidebands that can be demodulated to produce a signal within the

body. The 60 watts is then split between the upper and lower

sidebands, or 30 watts to each sideband. As each sideband is formed, a

harmonic of the sideband would be 1/2 the strength of the harmonic

that precedes it. For example if one is discussing the 12th harmonic of a

sideband , that harmonic is 1/2048 of the total power in the

sideband or in this case 30 watts/2048 = .0145watts. That is

a little over 1 hundredths of a watt . This is at the plasma tube - toss

in the inverse square law with distance and the power available for

treatment using this particular sideband starts looking ridiculously

slim.

Lets take the 5th sideband harmonic. At the 5th harmonic things

seem a little better at only 30/ 16 or 1.875 watts ( lets

round up to make it a whole 2 watts ) ....at the plasma

tube.

Going out to the 20th harmonic which is promoted as somehow being

effective, gives 30 watts/1048576 =.0000572 watts .

Can someone explain to me how a sideband with 57.2 millionths of a

watt ( at the plasma tube ) is somehow able to produce a field

powerful enough to interact with the body ( at say 3 to 5 feet away where

the field is much less – perhaps only 40 millionths of a watt ) and then

produce a strong enough resonance effect to kill off a virus or

bacteria ? A virus or bacteria that is deep inside the body.

A virus and bacteria whose resonant frequency is created by a

sideband that is being demodulated from a carrier wave that when below 4

MHz, the body is essentially transparent to ?

With this type of low power output from the side bands – why even use the

MOPA unit ? Why not just use the GB4000 with it’s 10 watt amplifier

to directly deliver the frequencies ? Why utilize amazingly

weak sidebands ? If you need 3,220,080 hz just have the GB 4000

output it at 10 watts ? The GB 4000 with amplifier can do this

using electrodes with more power delivery for most of the sideband

frequencies being promoted as effective than the MOPA .

There is a significant problem with some of the calculated

sidebands. Square waves produce only odd number harmonics. No even

number harmonics of the fundamental are generated. It is possible that

through mixing effects within the plasma tube and also through some

electrical qualities of the tuner circuit that even harmonics

can be emitted by the plasma tube. Generation of specific

even harmonics, especially a desirable even harmonic, is not reliable.

The reason is that if one is feeding the amplifier/modulator circuit only

with odd harmonics to modulate , it is the odd harmonics that are

amplified. Only when those odd harmonics reach the tube tuning circuit

and or the plasma tube will even harmonics possibly be generated.

Thus modulation of the MOPA unit with a square wave from a GB 4000

reliably produces an output to the tuning circuit and the plasma tube

that contains only the odd harmonics of the fundamental frequency.

Let's take a 6000 hz square wave modulation signal for example. The

harmonics of that 6000 hz modulating square wave which creates the

sidebands, are 6000, 18000, 30000,42000, and 54000. This for

the 1st through 5th sidebands ( upper and lower ) that would be

formed using square wave modulation of the RF carrier. Missing are 12000,

24000, 36000, 48000 and 60000.... all the even harmonics of 6000 Hz.

What does all this mean ?

How about an example using the GB4000/MOPA chart ?

Let's take 3.3MHz modulated with 8020 hz for E coli. It is

claimed that the 4th upper sideband ( a harmonic of 32080) will be

3,332,080 hz . That is doubtful. Let's see why. Using square waves

for modulation one obtains:

Sideband Harmonic 1 8020 hz

Sideband Harmonic 2 = 24060

Sideband Harmonic 3 = 40100hz

A complete miss of the even harmonic frequency being fed into the

MOPA for modulation/amplification.

If someone happens to be working with sideband harmonics and a MOPA on

something serious like Sarcoma, perhaps they might be a bit

concerned. BY virus has a resonance supposedly using 20080 hz with

a 3.3 MHz carrier. The problem is that this combination coupled with

square wave modulating signal provided by the GB4000 will not produce the

supposed BY frequency. The frequency is supposed to be at the 12th upper

sideband harmonic given at 240960 hz. Examining this, the frequency

is an even harmonic and that frequency is not fed to the MOPA for

modulation/amplification.

1st harmonic 20080

2nd harmonic 62400

3rd harmonic 100400

4th harmonic 140560

5th harmonic 180720

6th harmonic 220880

7th harmonic 261040

Completely missing the BY frequency . But for the sake of argument, let’s

say the 12th even upper sideband was generated. What sort of

power would it have? As previously mentioned, only .0145

watts.

Then there is the problem of frequency sweeps. The GB4000 is able to do

sweeps, but the minimum step size is 1 hz. If one is using the

3rd sideband harmonic of 8020, i.e. 40100. With a 1 hz

step sweep ( 8020, 8021, 8022) the third sideband harmonic becomes 40105,

40110, 40115 and so on. Steps are 5 Hz. Go out to the 10th

sideband harmonic, each 1 hz step in the modulation frequency

is 19 hz at the side band ! If one is relying upon the formation of

even harmonics via circuit output tuning and mixing effects within a hand

made plasma tube – who knows what size each frequency step will be.

A topic that concerns me is that well known Rife Frequencies have

undergone modification. I do understand that there is a slight room for

error on Rife’s part in measuring the frequencies, but do not understand

how some of these frequencies were derived and then modified with such

absolute accuracy. Why is it that Rife’s original frequency for

B.coli virus is 770000 hz and in charts which are associated with

theGB4000/ MOPA, the frequency for the B. coli virus is given as 769035

hz ? Why didn’t Rife just use 769,000 instead of 770,000 ? At

769000 he would have been only 35 hz off ?

There is a whole chart in use by the GB4000/MOPA where many

of the frequencies are quite different from those in the historic record

.. This chart is used to calculate the sidebands for the MOPA and GB4000

with amplifier devices. But notifications of what are in some cases

significant frequency variances from Rife’s aren’t provided to the

public . This is of concern to me for the title for the chart is "

Dr Rife's True Original HF Frequencies Fine Tuned to the Precise

Frequencies By Philip Hoyland " . I must ask “ is this really

...True, Original, and Fine Tuned " ? Does anyone know of a

frequency list with historic providence that Hoyland created using

these exact frequencies ? Are these “True and Original”

frequencies , really from Hoyland or Rife ?

Rife gave a frequency for the BX virus of 1.604MHz. The new list provides

a significant modification Rife's frequency . 1,604,000

becomes 1,607,450 hz . An amazing level of accuracy, right down to a 0

hz, not 451, not 448, but exactly 450 - this is a claimed accuracy equal

to one part in ten million ! Can someone please provide a historic

document with such accuracy and that proves this is the

actual frequency ?

For another major issue Carcinoma – I must question the following

statement.

To quote:

" The ability of this instrument to produce harmonic sidebands made

it possible for Philip Hoyland to use a fixed carrier frequency of 3.30

Megahertz (3,300,000 Hertz) and modulate that carrier frequency with an

audio frequency of 21,275 Hertz to produce the BX cancer virus primary

frequency of 3,214,900 Hertz (Dr. Rife's primary BX frequency of

1,607,450 Hertz multiplied by 2). What happens in the Beam Ray instrument

is the audio frequency of 21,275 Hertz creates many sideband frequencies

exactly 21,275 Hertz apart. The 4th lower sideband frequency that is

created from 21,275 Hertz is the BX cancer virus primary frequency of

3,214,900 Hertz. "

I would like to know the how the accuracy of the frequency above

was determined and the reliability of the above statement.

Where is a document saying that 3,214,900 Hz is the BX cancer

frequency ? This is a number accurate to one part in ten million.

What is not widely known is that there was some dissension within the UK

Rife group about the modulation frequencies of their original Beam Ray

instrument . In speaking with one of the team members, the team member

related to me that there were questions about a possible earlier

partial rebuild of the device and how the device had been reassembled

following the rebuild. Some members of the UK group felt the

10X treatment frequencies might have been correct. Certainly,

the one team member feel the frequency were correct, and felt the

actual frequencies should have been 1/10th that measured. In other words

802 hz was correct and not the 8020 hz.

One thing is for certain, 802 hz has produced results when used

on multiple differently designed frequency devices and 8020 hz has

not. The same with 2127.5 Vs 21275 and 2008 Vs 20080. The ten X

frequencies were not , and have not been effective .

By the way - Rife never had a frequency for cancer. He discovered a

frequency for a Virus that he claimed caused Cancer . The BX virus. Just

one carcinoma causing virus. We now know there are many viruses

linked to the creation of carcinoma. Rife may have been able to

isolate and culture his BX virus from some sort of cancer ( breast and/or

?) . But other people besides Rife have isolated different viruses

from cancer and showed these viruses can cause cancer. Different

viruses being found in different tissues , causing different

carcinomas. Rife did not differentiate what type of carcinoma the

BX was producing. Just because a cancer occurs in the lungs , bone, or

colon, does not mean that all cancers that may be related to the

cancer caused by Rife's BX virus. For one to say that Rife's BX virus is

the only virus linked to and is the cause of all

cancers is in my opinion, ridiculous.

Then there is the question - does killing off a virus that may be causing

a cancer kill off the cancer too ? The answer is no . Let's look at this

situation starting with a bacteria. H. pylori causes stomach cancer, once

the cancer starts, taking antibiotics doesn't kill the cancer, but does

remove the H. pylori infection. Taking antiviral medications when a woman

has cervical cancer may kill off her HPV infection, but doesn't do

anything to the cancer. One explanation about what is happening with

Rife's BX frequency, is that the frequency affects cancers

regardless of origin. The frequency obviously also affects

Rife's BX virus should it happen to be present in a particular case of

cancer. If one has a different type of viral infection that may

have caused or contributed to their cancer, it might be wise to obtain

specific frequencies for that virus from Charlene Boehm using her

patented frequency derivation method.

Rife's invitro effects more specifically his MORs’ - according to Rife

- are due to an interaction of a particular frequency with the

chemical constituents of a particular bacteria or virus. There are

two issues here to consider. Issue #1 - " What makes up the

chemical constituents of a bacteria ? " This is a highly important

question. The answer as it relates to Rife's Invitro effect is in part,

extremely basic and not complex at all. Issue #2 - The frequency input to

the device in conjunction with the device’s electronics and plasma tube

size and construction determines the spectral output of the device. This

output being emitted from the plasma tube is highly complex. I assure you

that unless one were to duplicate Rife's original instruments down to the

component level, then use the device with the identical plasma tube Rife

used , that the output of any replica device will be substantially

different in many aspects of its emission spectra than that of an

original device.

The question is of course how important is complete and absolute

replication ? What is ultimately important is the ability of the device

to produce physiologic effects and repeatable outcomes. Modern day

frequency devices of all types are highly adept at this.

The carrier frequency is not the be all, end all, secret to achieving

treatment success. There are many aspects related to superior treatment

success. Each type of frequency device has strengths and weaknesses. An

electrode device can stimulate muscles and lymph flow for instance where

a field device cannot. Some field type devices do not use carrier waves

and are quite effective. In using a device that has a

carrier wave, the carrier wave when coupled with the other

electrical components that constitute the device produce

attributes that contribute to effectiveness.

When discussing Rife’s Invitro effects there is some good news. I believe

I am right about this, and existing science backs my

contention. There is no magical missing electrical component

or electrical field emission necessary to create Rife's

invitro effect. No special carrier frequency, no specific side band

frequency matched to a carrier wave of a special frequency is

necessary. A specific modulation/treatment frequency plays a part, but it

is just part of the effect. The MOR’s that Rife derived were

useful, for not only did the MOR create effects in a petri dish, but also

within the body. A very important consideration. What good is an MOR of

an invitro effect unless it translates into treatment effectiveness

? The answer to how invitro success may be correlated to

invivo treatment success of that same frequency I believe is quite

simple . This is a topic for a later time – but my opinion is that the

invitro effect is dependent upon all aspects of what Rife was doing

to determine the MOR , and not just the device.

What ultimately makes a particular field device effective is a

combination of factors, the sidebands are only one factor, and all

other factors of the device are also important. What is

significant, is that modern day instruments of all types have the ability

to use the same frequencies and obtain results. Some devices work

better and quicker and more effectively than others. But the frequencies

are , have been, and continue to be , interchangeable between machines.

How well the sideband modulation frequencies promoted for the GB400/MOPA

work on other machines is unknown.

Some important considerations:

Patents behind the plasma tube system that I have created are based upon

overmodulation. A Bare instrument or the Resonant Light Technology

P.E.R.L. instrument ( which uses the Bare Patents ) is not the same as

the MOPA, and should not be confused with the MOPA. Overmodulation

is where the modulating signal is in excess of the power of the

carrier wave. That is, a modulation ratio greater than 1. In my system,

Modulation Ratios approach 3, the system produces what is known as a

diminished carrier, dual side band transmission. The patented Bare

system ( which is also used by the Resonant Light Inc. P.E.R.L.)

with similar modulated power output to that of a modulated MOPA

transmitter ( 180 watts ) moves almost all of the RF power of the

system to the sidebands. Instead of there being sidebands with a total of

60 watts of power, power in the side bands of the Bare overmodulation

system (for this example) would be well in excess of 160 watts.

That is 80 + watts for each set of upper and lower sidebands Vs 30

each for the MOPA. In order for a MOPA to produce 160 watts of power

for the sidebands, the carrier wave in a MOPA would have to be 320

watts and the modulated signal of the MOPA to be of 480 watts.

Overmodulation ( well in excess of 200 % ) also produces more

sideband harmonics than use of 100 % modulation as in the MOPA.

When one modulates a fixed, stable, sine wave RF carrier at 100 %

with a single frequency sine wave – there are no harmonics and only one

upper and one lower sideband is generated and fed to the tuning circuit

and plasma tube. When one Overmodulates an RF carrier with a sine

wave – Even and Odd harmonics are created in both the upper and lower

sidebands prior to the signals being sent to the tuning circuit and

plasma tube. To keep from infringing upon my patents, the MOPA is

limited to 100 % modulation, and cannot/should not overmodulate.

Overmodulation of square waves coupled with duty cycles in excess of

50% will also produce even sideband harmonics. In fact spectral

displays of the plasma tube emissions from a Bare device with 100 hz

resolution show the presence of not only odd and even harmonics,

but also the presence of heterodyne product formed

sidebands.

I apologize that this document is so lengthy, however there has

been a need of open discourse and evaluation of these topics

for some time.