Re: Scanning for best rife frequencies?

[Guest guest]

research the Ondamed device

http://www.ondamed.net/home.html

it is supposed to be able to scan you and finds frequencies you need and treats

also.

Also the Inergetix is supposed to do similar and much more

http://www.energy-medicine.info/

Both pricey so, for most only obtainable by finding a service provider to pay

for the sessions

>

>

>

> Hi, So many people seem to have trouble finding the right frequencies with

rife machines.

>

> I was wondering if there were any accurate shortcuts to doing this such as

using a machine to scan you for the best frequencies then using those

frequencies on a rife machine.

>

> Anyone know any specific machines that can do this and any special ways it's

done?

>

> How about other shortcuts like muscle testing?

>

> Any additional thoughts appreciated!

>

>

> Bay Area, CA

>

[Guest guest]

We use both the F-SCAN2 and the Zyto for this.

http://www.royalrife.com

>

>

>

> Hi, So many people seem to have trouble finding the right frequencies

> with rife machines.

>

> I was wondering if there were any accurate shortcuts to doing this

> such as using a machine to scan you for the best frequencies then

> using those frequencies on a rife machine.

>

> Anyone know any specific machines that can do this and any special

> ways it's done?

>

> How about other shortcuts like muscle testing?

>

> Any additional thoughts appreciated!

>

>

> Bay Area, CA

>

>

[Guest guest]

The new free Frex17 can run sweeps, so perhaps that could be used to figure out hits? It would take time and patience to figure it out.

The F-scan definitely has this capability as it records hits during it’s initial scan and saves and can print out this data.

Muscle testing can be very useful, but has limitations i.e. if the bugs aren’t actively being addressed by the immune system i.e. are encysted during testing, they could be missed. That would probably also be true for any method used.

<So many people seem to have trouble finding the right frequencies with rife machines. I was wondering if there were any accurate shortcuts to doing this such as using a machine to scan you for the best frequencies then using those frequencies on a rife machine. Anyone know any specific machines that can do this and any special ways it's done?How about other shortcuts like muscle testing?Any additional thoughts appreciated!>

Bonita PoulinCanadian CoordinatorGLOBAL RECOGNITION CAMPAIGNMultiple Chem ical Sensitivityand other Chem ically Induced Illnesses, Dis eases & Injuryaffecting civilians and military personnelwww.mcs-global.org www.mcsglobalawareness.com

[Guest guest]

The Frex16 version also has had the capability to do sweeps and " wobbles " so, no

need to wait for the final Frex17.

>

> The new free Frex17 can run sweeps, so perhaps that could be used to figure

out hits? It would take time and patience to figure it out.

> The F-scan definitely has this capability as it records hits during it's

initial scan and saves and can print out this data.

> Muscle testing can be very useful, but has limitations i.e. if the bugs aren't

actively being addressed by the immune system i.e. are encysted during testing,

they could be missed. That would probably also be true for any method used.

>

>

>

> <So many people seem to have trouble finding the right frequencies with rife

machines.

> I was wondering if there were any accurate shortcuts to doing this such as

using a machine to scan you for the best frequencies then using those

frequencies on a rife machine.

> Anyone know any specific machines that can do this and any special ways it's

done?

> How about other shortcuts like muscle testing?

> Any additional thoughts appreciated!>

>

>

>

> Bonita Poulin

>

> Canadian Coordinator

> GLOBAL RECOGNITION CAMPAIGN

> Multiple Chem ical Sensitivity

> and other Chem ically Induced Illnesses, Dis eases & Injury

> affecting civilians and military personnel

> www.mcs-global.org

> www.mcsglobalawareness.com

>

[Guest guest]

> The Frex16 version also has had the capability to do sweeps and

> " wobbles " so, no need to wait for the final Frex17.

The main purpose for FreX 17 is to produce a correct output frequencies

to run Jeff Garf's 3.1 MHz frequency sweep. Jeff's sweep requires a 500

to 25,000 Hz frequency range.

Since computer sound systems usually cannot reproduce signals above

21,000 Hz, FreX 17 is designed to output one half of the required

frequency. I. E., a 500 Hz required frequency equals 250 Hz output from

FreX 17; a 25,000 Hz required frequency equals 12,500 Hz output from

FreX 17.

The output from FreX 17 is now within the frequency range that the

computer can generate. The computer's audio output is then sent to the

input of my SSQ-2F v3.10 circuit board. The SSQ-2F v3.10 doubles the

audio frequency from the computer, converted into a square wave, and

uses square wave modulates a 3.1 MHz carrier. The 3.1 MHz carrier is

then amplified to a power level sufficient to drive a small plasma tube.

However, FreX 16 will work just fine with the SSQ-2F v3.10. You just

have to do the frequency division yourself and insert the half

frequencies into FreX 16 and tell it to use those. FreX 17 will have

some other features as well, but it still under development, according

to Ken.

Yours truly,

Ralph Hartwell

Spectrotek Services

http://rife-beam-ray.com

[Guest guest]

Thanks for the clarification.

<The main purpose for FreX 17 is to produce a correct output frequenciesto run Jeff Garf's 3.1 MHz frequency sweep. Jeff's sweep requires a 500to 25,000 Hz frequency range.>

Bonita PoulinCanadian CoordinatorGLOBAL RECOGNITION CAMPAIGNMultiple Chem ical Sensitivityand other Chem ically Induced Illnesses, Dis eases & Injuryaffecting civilians and military personnelwww.mcs-global.org www.mcsglobalawareness.com

[Guest guest]

USA Today , 07/17/2012 , has an interesting article on Microbes in the human body !

Subject: Re: Scanning for best rife frequencies?To: Rife Date: Monday, July 16, 2012, 2:04 PM

The new free Frex17 can run sweeps, so perhaps that could be used to figure out hits? It would take time and patience to figure it out.

The F-scan definitely has this capability as it records hits during it’s initial scan and saves and can print out this data.

Muscle testing can be very useful, but has limitations i.e. if the bugs aren’t actively being addressed by the immune system i.e. are encysted during testing, they could be missed. That would probably also be true for any method used.

<So many people seem to have trouble finding the right frequencies with rife machines. I was wondering if there were any accurate shortcuts to doing this such as using a machine to scan you for the best frequencies then using those frequencies on a rife machine. Anyone know any specific machines that can do this and any special ways it's done?How about other shortcuts like muscle testing?Any additional thoughts appreciated!>

Bonita PoulinCanadian CoordinatorGLOBAL RECOGNITION CAMPAIGNMultiple Chem ical Sensitivityand other Chem ically Induced Illnesses, Dis eases & Injuryaffecting civilians and military personnelwww.mcs-global.org www.mcsglobalawareness.com