Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

letter to Colorado committee for its mercury/vaccines hearing Wednesday, Feb 15, 2006

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Original document was sent in MS Word, thus the odd format herein.

Proposed bill can be enjoyed at url in cite 34.

This post may be forwarded hither and yon.

* * * *

Limiting Mercury in vaccines

SB06-099

to:

cc: Bob Hagedorn ©

Deanna Hanna (VC)

Steve

a Sandoval

Shaffer

Kiki Traylor

fr: Binstock

Researcher in Developmental & Behavioral Neuroanatomy

P.O. Box 1788

Estes Park CO 80517

As your committee considers SB06-099 (34), please consider several points:

A. The CDC’s 1999 study found statistically significant associations

between thimerosal injections and a range of neurologic problems,

including but not limited to attention deficits, language problems,

sleep disorders, tics, and autism (1).

B. The CDC proceeded deliberately to dilute its own 1999 findings (eg,

2-5).

C. “Pediatrics”, a journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics,

published the diluted-data rendition of the CDC’s findings as

Verstraeten et al 2003 (6).

D. FOIA evidence presented in court documents includes a CDC-IOM meeting

transcript indicating that conclusions for the IOM’s second thimerosal

hearing were predetermined by the CDC, which hired the IOM to

orchestrate the IOM’s second thimerosal hearing (7, see also 8).

Thus, public record indicates that the primary basis of rationales

alleging thimerosal’s lack of adverse effects is rooted in CDC data that

CDC employees diluted. Were a medical school researcher to deliberately

dilute data, he or she would be promptly barred from the laboratory.

Furthermore, recent U.S. history offers precedents in suppressing data

damaging to financial interests and in the recruitment of physicians and

researchers willing to cooperate with those same financial interests on

behalf of hiding data showing adverse effects (eg, 9).

Conclusion: The toxic load of pregnant women is increasing, as are the

numbers of toxins in infants and others (eg, 10-27). Thus, thimerosal –

which is 49.6% ethylmercury by weight (reviewed in 28) – ought not be

added to the toxic load within the bodies of women, fetus, infants, and

toddlers. I encourage this Senate committee and the Colorado legislature

to pass legislation banning or severely limiting physicians’ and nurses’

ability to inject thimerosal, a known neurotoxin (eg, 29-33), into

humans in Colorado.

References:

1. CDC documents obtained by FOIA, critiqued by Mark Blaxill of

Safeminds.org

http://www.safeminds.org/Generation%20Zero%20Syn.pdf

http://www.safeminds.org/Generation%20Zero%20Pres.pdf

2. http://www.safeminds.org/legislation/foia/simpsonwood.html

3. http://www.safeminds.org/research/past.html

4. http://www.generationrescue.org/mercury_myths14.html

5. http://www.momsonamissionforautism.org/index/VSD.SafeMinds.critique.pdf

6. Verstraeten T et al. Safety of thimerosal-containing vaccines: a

two-phased study of computerized health maintenance organization

databases. Pediatrics. 2003 Nov;112(5):1039-48.

7. Closed Meeting Transcript of IOM - Immunization Safety Review Committee

http://www.nomercury.org/iom.htm

8. Congressman Weldon (R-Fla) speech to Autism One conference

http://www.autisminfo.com/WeldonAutismOne2004.htm

9. Exposed: The Secret Corporate Funding Behind Health Research

Academics and the media have failed dismally to ask the crucial question

of scientists' claims: who is paying you?

by Monbiot

Tuesday, February 7, 2006 by the Guardian/UK

http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,1704107,00.html

10. Bosman J. Reporters Find Science Journals Harder to Trust, but Not

Easy to Verify.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/13/business/media/13journal.html

11. Marsee, K, TJ Woodruff, DA Axelrad, AM Calafat, and SH Swan. 2006.

Estimated Daily Phthalate Exposures in a Population of Mothers of Male

Infants Exhibiting Reduced Anogenital Distance. Environmental Health

Perspectives, in press.

http://www.ourstolenfuture.org/NewScience/oncompounds/phthalates/2006/2006-0205m\

arseeetal.htm

12. One in five women of childbearing age for mercury in a national

survey have levels exceeding the EPA's recommended limit. The more fish

they ate, --including store-bought fish, canned tuna and locally caught

fish-- the higher their levels. An Investigation of Factors Related to

Levels of Mercury in Human Hair.

http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/press/reports/an-investigation-of-factors-re

13. North American children remain at risk from environmental exposures.

Data show a rising number of childhood asthma cases across North

America. Lead levels have improved but paint hazards remain. Mexico

faces large challenges in water and sanitation. Children’s health and

the environment in North America. Published by North American Commission

for Environmental ation. 4 February 2006.

http://www.cec.org/pubs_docs/documents/index.cfm?varlan=english & ID=1917

14. A cocktail of harmful toxic chemicals has been found inside every

person tested in a Canada-wide study. Many of the chemicals discovered

in the bodies of Canadians are associated with cancer, hormone

disruption, reproductive disorders, respiratory illnesses and harming

the development of children. Toxic Nation. Pollution, It's in You!

Published by Environmental Defence Canada. 19 January 2006.

http://www.environmentaldefence.ca/toxicnation/home.php

15. Tap water in 42 states is contaminated with more than 140 chemicals

lacking safety standards. Public health officials have not set safety

standards for these chemicals, even though millions drink them every

day. A national assessment of tap water quality. Published by

Environmental Working Group. 20 December 2005.

http://www.ewg.org/tapwater/findings.php

16. CDC's biomonitoring report reveals continued presence of several

long-banned chemicals, such as PCBs and DDT, in people in the US.

Children had higher levels than adults of phthalates and organophosphate

pesticides. Disparities among racial/ethnic groups continue to be a

concern, with Mexican Americans, Non-Hispanic Blacks and Non-Hispanic

Whites showing different patterns of exposures to several chemicals.

LDDI analysis – CDC biomonitoring. Published by The Learning and

Developmental Disabilities Initiative. 11 November 2005.

http://www.iceh.org/LDDISummaryCDC.html

17. The first US study to test household dust for a new and wide variety

of chemicals found disturbing evidence of toxic chemicals in ordinary

homes across the country. This study shows that the US federal

regulatory system has failed in protecting people from exposure to

hazardous chemicals including toxic flame retardants, pesticides, and

hormone disrupting chemicals. Sick of dust. Published by Safer Products

Project. 24 October 2005

http://www.safer-products.org/page.php?p=dust

18. A European-wide family bloodtesting survey found a total of 73

man-made hazardous chemicals in the blood of 13 families (grandmothers,

mothers and children) from 12 European countries. The highest number of

chemicals was detected in the grandmothers' generation (63). However,

the younger generation had more chemicals in their blood (59) than their

mothers (49), and some chemicals were found at their highest levels in

the children. Generations X. Published by World Wildlife Fund - UK. 6

October 2005

http://www.panda.org/campaign/detox/news_publications/news.cfm?uNewsID=23635

19. Environmental contaminants in breast milk. Nickerson K. J Midwifery

Womens Health. 2006 Jan-Feb;51(1):26-34.

20. Determination of organochlorine pesticide residues in the blood of

healthy individuals. Charlier CJ, Plomteux GJ. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2002

Apr;40(4):361-4.

21. Tests on blood taken from the umbilical cords of nearly 30 new-born

babies and from more than 40 new mothers revealed contamination in every

sample of mother or baby blood tested. All umbilical cords contained a

minimum of five of the 35 chemicals tested for, some contained as many

as 14. Two of the mothers tested had 17 of the 35 chemicals in their

blood. A present for life: Hazardous chemicals in cord blood. Published

by Greenpeace International, World Wildlife Fund - UK. 8 September 2005.

http://www.wwf-uk.org/news/n_0000001830.asp

22. A new study confirms that chemical exposure begins in the womb, as

hundreds of industrial chemicals, pollutants and pesticides are pumped

back and forth from mother to baby through umbilical cord blood.

Laboratory tests of 10 American Red Cross cord blood samples found an

average of 200 contaminants. The pollutants included mercury, fire

retardants, pesticides and the Teflon chemical PFOA. In total, the

babies' blood had 287 chemicals, including 209 never before detected in

cord blood. The Pollution in Newborns. Published by Environmental

Working Group. 14 July 2005

http://www.ewg.org/reports/bodyburden2/newsrelease.php

23. Children as young as nine years old are not only contaminated with a

cocktail of hazardous man-made chemicals but can have higher

concentrations of certain newer chemicals than older generations. Of the

104 chemicals analysed, 80 were detected - children were found to have

75 chemicals in their blood, 75 were found in parents and 56 in

grandmothers. Contaminated: the next generation. Published by World

Wildlife Fund - UK. 10 October 2004.

http://www.wwf.org.uk/News/n_0000001359.asp

24. Very few women’s health concerns, including the effects of exposure

passed from mother to fetus, are taken into account when government

agencies or corporations set 'safe' exposure levels. A new report

reveals how women and their families are exposed in homes and

neighborhoods, at work, in the broader community, and across the state.

Confronting Toxic Contamination in Our Communities: Women’s Health and

California’s Future. Published by Women's Foundation of California. 10

October 2003.

http://www.womensfoundca.org/fullreport10_7.pdf

25. Hooper K, She J. Lessons from the polybrominated diphenyl ethers

(PBDEs): precautionary principle, primary prevention, and the value of

community-based body-burden monitoring using breast milk. Environ Health

Perspect. 2003 Jan;111(1):109-14.

http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2003/5438/5438.html

http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2003/5438/5438.pdf

26. Landrigan P et al. Chemical contaminants in breast milk and their

impacts on children's health: an overview. Environ Health Perspect. 2002

Jun;110(6):A313-5.

http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2002/110pA313-A315landrigan/landrigan-full.html

http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2002/110pA313-A315landrigan/EHP110pA313PDF.PDF

27. Suzuki G, Nakano M, Nakano S. Distribution of PCDDs/PCDFs and

Co-PCBs in human maternal blood, cord blood, placenta, milk, and adipose

tissue: dioxins showing high toxic equivalency factor accumulate in the

placenta. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2005 Oct;69(10):1836-47.

http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/bbb/69/10/69_1836/_article

http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/bbb/69/10/1836/_pdf

28. Bernard et al. Autism: a novel form of mercury poisoning. Med

Hypotheses. 2001 Apr;56(4):462-71.

29. Baskin et al. Thimerosal induces DNA breaks, caspase-3 activation,

membrane damage, and cell death in cultured human neurons and

fibroblasts. Toxicol Sci. 2003 Aug;74(2):361-8

http://toxsci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/74/2/361?ijkey=0dd70f346f3fe83d8a3b\

fa5b361af3f4eff26c25

30. Waly et al. Activation of methionine synthase by insulin-like growth

factor-1 and dopamine: a target for neurodevelopmental toxins and

thimerosal.

Mol Psychiatry. 2004 Apr;9(4):358-70.

31. Havarinasab S, Hultman P. Organic mercury compounds and autoimmunity.

Autoimmun Rev. 2005 Jun;4(5):270-5.

32. Mutter J et al. Mercury and autism: accelerating evidence? Neuro

Endocrinol Lett. 2005 Oct;26(5):439-46.

33. Burbacher TM et al. Comparison of blood and brain mercury levels in

infant monkeys exposed to methylmercury or vaccines containing

thimerosal. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Aug;113(8):1015-21.

http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2005/7712/7712.html

http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2005/7712/7712.pdf

34.SB06-099

http://www.leg.state.co.us/Clics2006A/csl.nsf/fsbillcont3/612F2210EC1F055A872570\

660062EC82?Open & file=099_01.pdf

---

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent work !!!

Shari

letter to Colorado committee for its

mercury/vaccines hearing Wednesday, Feb 15, 2006

> Original document was sent in MS Word, thus the odd format herein.

> Proposed bill can be enjoyed at url in cite 34.

>

> This post may be forwarded hither and yon.

>

>

>

> * * * *

>

> Limiting Mercury in vaccines

> SB06-099

>

>

> to:

>

>

>

> cc: Bob Hagedorn ©

> Deanna Hanna (VC)

> Steve

>

> a Sandoval

> Shaffer

> Kiki Traylor

>

>

> fr: Binstock

> Researcher in Developmental & Behavioral Neuroanatomy

> P.O. Box 1788

> Estes Park CO 80517

>

> As your committee considers SB06-099 (34), please consider several points:

>

> A. The CDC’s 1999 study found statistically significant associations

> between thimerosal injections and a range of neurologic problems,

> including but not limited to attention deficits, language problems,

> sleep disorders, tics, and autism (1).

>

> B. The CDC proceeded deliberately to dilute its own 1999 findings (eg,

> 2-5).

>

> C. “Pediatrics”, a journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics,

> published the diluted-data rendition of the CDC’s findings as

> Verstraeten et al 2003 (6).

>

> D. FOIA evidence presented in court documents includes a CDC-IOM meeting

> transcript indicating that conclusions for the IOM’s second thimerosal

> hearing were predetermined by the CDC, which hired the IOM to

> orchestrate the IOM’s second thimerosal hearing (7, see also 8).

>

> Thus, public record indicates that the primary basis of rationales

> alleging thimerosal’s lack of adverse effects is rooted in CDC data that

> CDC employees diluted. Were a medical school researcher to deliberately

> dilute data, he or she would be promptly barred from the laboratory.

> Furthermore, recent U.S. history offers precedents in suppressing data

> damaging to financial interests and in the recruitment of physicians and

> researchers willing to cooperate with those same financial interests on

> behalf of hiding data showing adverse effects (eg, 9).

>

> Conclusion: The toxic load of pregnant women is increasing, as are the

> numbers of toxins in infants and others (eg, 10-27). Thus, thimerosal –

> which is 49.6% ethylmercury by weight (reviewed in 28) – ought not be

> added to the toxic load within the bodies of women, fetus, infants, and

> toddlers. I encourage this Senate committee and the Colorado legislature

> to pass legislation banning or severely limiting physicians’ and nurses’

> ability to inject thimerosal, a known neurotoxin (eg, 29-33), into

> humans in Colorado.

>

>

> References:

>

> 1. CDC documents obtained by FOIA, critiqued by Mark Blaxill of

> Safeminds.org

> http://www.safeminds.org/Generation%20Zero%20Syn.pdf

> http://www.safeminds.org/Generation%20Zero%20Pres.pdf

>

> 2. http://www.safeminds.org/legislation/foia/simpsonwood.html

>

> 3. http://www.safeminds.org/research/past.html

>

> 4. http://www.generationrescue.org/mercury_myths14.html

>

> 5. http://www.momsonamissionforautism.org/index/VSD.SafeMinds.critique.pdf

>

> 6. Verstraeten T et al. Safety of thimerosal-containing vaccines: a

> two-phased study of computerized health maintenance organization

> databases. Pediatrics. 2003 Nov;112(5):1039-48.

>

> 7. Closed Meeting Transcript of IOM - Immunization Safety Review Committee

> http://www.nomercury.org/iom.htm

>

> 8. Congressman Weldon (R-Fla) speech to Autism One conference

> http://www.autisminfo.com/WeldonAutismOne2004.htm

>

> 9. Exposed: The Secret Corporate Funding Behind Health Research

> Academics and the media have failed dismally to ask the crucial question

> of scientists' claims: who is paying you?

> by Monbiot

> Tuesday, February 7, 2006 by the Guardian/UK

> http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,1704107,00.html

>

> 10. Bosman J. Reporters Find Science Journals Harder to Trust, but Not

> Easy to Verify.

> http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/13/business/media/13journal.html

>

>

> 11. Marsee, K, TJ Woodruff, DA Axelrad, AM Calafat, and SH Swan. 2006.

> Estimated Daily Phthalate Exposures in a Population of Mothers of Male

> Infants Exhibiting Reduced Anogenital Distance. Environmental Health

> Perspectives, in press.

>

http://www.ourstolenfuture.org/NewScience/oncompounds/phthalates/2006/2006-0205m\

arseeetal.htm

>

> 12. One in five women of childbearing age for mercury in a national

> survey have levels exceeding the EPA's recommended limit. The more fish

> they ate, --including store-bought fish, canned tuna and locally caught

> fish-- the higher their levels. An Investigation of Factors Related to

> Levels of Mercury in Human Hair.

> http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/press/reports/an-investigation-of-factors-re

>

> 13. North American children remain at risk from environmental exposures.

> Data show a rising number of childhood asthma cases across North

> America. Lead levels have improved but paint hazards remain. Mexico

> faces large challenges in water and sanitation. Children’s health and

> the environment in North America. Published by North American Commission

> for Environmental ation. 4 February 2006.

> http://www.cec.org/pubs_docs/documents/index.cfm?varlan=english & ID=1917

>

> 14. A cocktail of harmful toxic chemicals has been found inside every

> person tested in a Canada-wide study. Many of the chemicals discovered

> in the bodies of Canadians are associated with cancer, hormone

> disruption, reproductive disorders, respiratory illnesses and harming

> the development of children. Toxic Nation. Pollution, It's in You!

> Published by Environmental Defence Canada. 19 January 2006.

> http://www.environmentaldefence.ca/toxicnation/home.php

>

> 15. Tap water in 42 states is contaminated with more than 140 chemicals

> lacking safety standards. Public health officials have not set safety

> standards for these chemicals, even though millions drink them every

> day. A national assessment of tap water quality. Published by

> Environmental Working Group. 20 December 2005.

> http://www.ewg.org/tapwater/findings.php

>

> 16. CDC's biomonitoring report reveals continued presence of several

> long-banned chemicals, such as PCBs and DDT, in people in the US.

> Children had higher levels than adults of phthalates and organophosphate

> pesticides. Disparities among racial/ethnic groups continue to be a

> concern, with Mexican Americans, Non-Hispanic Blacks and Non-Hispanic

> Whites showing different patterns of exposures to several chemicals.

> LDDI analysis – CDC biomonitoring. Published by The Learning and

> Developmental Disabilities Initiative. 11 November 2005.

> http://www.iceh.org/LDDISummaryCDC.html

>

> 17. The first US study to test household dust for a new and wide variety

> of chemicals found disturbing evidence of toxic chemicals in ordinary

> homes across the country. This study shows that the US federal

> regulatory system has failed in protecting people from exposure to

> hazardous chemicals including toxic flame retardants, pesticides, and

> hormone disrupting chemicals. Sick of dust. Published by Safer Products

> Project. 24 October 2005

> http://www.safer-products.org/page.php?p=dust

>

> 18. A European-wide family bloodtesting survey found a total of 73

> man-made hazardous chemicals in the blood of 13 families (grandmothers,

> mothers and children) from 12 European countries. The highest number of

> chemicals was detected in the grandmothers' generation (63). However,

> the younger generation had more chemicals in their blood (59) than their

> mothers (49), and some chemicals were found at their highest levels in

> the children. Generations X. Published by World Wildlife Fund - UK. 6

> October 2005

>

http://www.panda.org/campaign/detox/news_publications/news.cfm?uNewsID=23635

>

> 19. Environmental contaminants in breast milk. Nickerson K. J Midwifery

> Womens Health. 2006 Jan-Feb;51(1):26-34.

>

> 20. Determination of organochlorine pesticide residues in the blood of

> healthy individuals. Charlier CJ, Plomteux GJ. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2002

> Apr;40(4):361-4.

>

> 21. Tests on blood taken from the umbilical cords of nearly 30 new-born

> babies and from more than 40 new mothers revealed contamination in every

> sample of mother or baby blood tested. All umbilical cords contained a

> minimum of five of the 35 chemicals tested for, some contained as many

> as 14. Two of the mothers tested had 17 of the 35 chemicals in their

> blood. A present for life: Hazardous chemicals in cord blood. Published

> by Greenpeace International, World Wildlife Fund - UK. 8 September 2005.

> http://www.wwf-uk.org/news/n_0000001830.asp

>

> 22. A new study confirms that chemical exposure begins in the womb, as

> hundreds of industrial chemicals, pollutants and pesticides are pumped

> back and forth from mother to baby through umbilical cord blood.

> Laboratory tests of 10 American Red Cross cord blood samples found an

> average of 200 contaminants. The pollutants included mercury, fire

> retardants, pesticides and the Teflon chemical PFOA. In total, the

> babies' blood had 287 chemicals, including 209 never before detected in

> cord blood. The Pollution in Newborns. Published by Environmental

> Working Group. 14 July 2005

> http://www.ewg.org/reports/bodyburden2/newsrelease.php

>

> 23. Children as young as nine years old are not only contaminated with a

> cocktail of hazardous man-made chemicals but can have higher

> concentrations of certain newer chemicals than older generations. Of the

> 104 chemicals analysed, 80 were detected - children were found to have

> 75 chemicals in their blood, 75 were found in parents and 56 in

> grandmothers. Contaminated: the next generation. Published by World

> Wildlife Fund - UK. 10 October 2004.

> http://www.wwf.org.uk/News/n_0000001359.asp

>

> 24. Very few women’s health concerns, including the effects of exposure

> passed from mother to fetus, are taken into account when government

> agencies or corporations set 'safe' exposure levels. A new report

> reveals how women and their families are exposed in homes and

> neighborhoods, at work, in the broader community, and across the state.

> Confronting Toxic Contamination in Our Communities: Women’s Health and

> California’s Future. Published by Women's Foundation of California. 10

> October 2003.

> http://www.womensfoundca.org/fullreport10_7.pdf

>

> 25. Hooper K, She J. Lessons from the polybrominated diphenyl ethers

> (PBDEs): precautionary principle, primary prevention, and the value of

> community-based body-burden monitoring using breast milk. Environ Health

> Perspect. 2003 Jan;111(1):109-14.

> http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2003/5438/5438.html

> http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2003/5438/5438.pdf

>

> 26. Landrigan P et al. Chemical contaminants in breast milk and their

> impacts on children's health: an overview. Environ Health Perspect. 2002

> Jun;110(6):A313-5.

>

http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2002/110pA313-A315landrigan/landrigan-full.html

>

http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2002/110pA313-A315landrigan/EHP110pA313PDF.PDF

>

> 27. Suzuki G, Nakano M, Nakano S. Distribution of PCDDs/PCDFs and

> Co-PCBs in human maternal blood, cord blood, placenta, milk, and adipose

> tissue: dioxins showing high toxic equivalency factor accumulate in the

> placenta. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2005 Oct;69(10):1836-47.

> http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/bbb/69/10/69_1836/_article

> http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/bbb/69/10/1836/_pdf

>

> 28. Bernard et al. Autism: a novel form of mercury poisoning. Med

> Hypotheses. 2001 Apr;56(4):462-71.

>

> 29. Baskin et al. Thimerosal induces DNA breaks, caspase-3 activation,

> membrane damage, and cell death in cultured human neurons and

> fibroblasts. Toxicol Sci. 2003 Aug;74(2):361-8

>

http://toxsci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/74/2/361?ijkey=0dd70f346f3fe83d8a3b\

fa5b361af3f4eff26c25

>

> 30. Waly et al. Activation of methionine synthase by insulin-like growth

> factor-1 and dopamine: a target for neurodevelopmental toxins and

> thimerosal.

> Mol Psychiatry. 2004 Apr;9(4):358-70.

>

> 31. Havarinasab S, Hultman P. Organic mercury compounds and autoimmunity.

> Autoimmun Rev. 2005 Jun;4(5):270-5.

>

> 32. Mutter J et al. Mercury and autism: accelerating evidence? Neuro

> Endocrinol Lett. 2005 Oct;26(5):439-46.

>

> 33. Burbacher TM et al. Comparison of blood and brain mercury levels in

> infant monkeys exposed to methylmercury or vaccines containing

> thimerosal. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Aug;113(8):1015-21.

> http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2005/7712/7712.html

> http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2005/7712/7712.pdf

>

> 34.SB06-099

>

http://www.leg.state.co.us/Clics2006A/csl.nsf/fsbillcont3/612F2210EC1F055A872570\

660062EC82?Open & file=099_01.pdf

>

> ---

>

>

>

>

> Many frequently asked questions and answers can be found at

<http://forums.autism-rxguidebook.com/default.aspx>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...