Guest guest Posted March 22, 2012 Report Share Posted March 22, 2012 Heh. You got my attention, - you *knew* you would! Newland wrote: > *Autism risk gene linked to differences in brain structure* > > http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-03/mali-arg032112.php That's the publisher's Press Release... > > The research they are referring to is available online @ > http://online.liebertpub.com/toc/brain/0/ja > > Scroll down to: ....announcing the actual article: > > *Altered Structural Brain Connectivity in Healthy rs of the Autism > Risk Gene, CNTNAP2* Description: free access > > Larson Dennis, Neda Jahanshad, D Rudie, A Brown, > Kori , McMahon, Greig de Zubicaray, Grant Montgomery, > , Margaret , Bookheimer, Mirella Dapretto, > Arthur Toga, > > Brain Connectivity. Feb 2012, ahead of print. ....which I read in its entirety. > > Abstract <http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/brain.2011.0064> > | Full Text PDF > <http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1089/brain.2011.0064> | [ snip ] The authors say very little about autism itself - essentially nothing. It's all more their demonstration that a very complicated investigative method could be useful in neurological research. However, IMO their choice of target gene - CNTNAP2 - is unfortunate. It *is* an " autism 'risk' gene " in the sense there is a statistical " association " with a population " having " autism. There are many, many such " risk " genes. But CNTNAP2 *also* has a strong association with " seizures " (acknowledged in the Introduction). So they *could* have put " Seizure Risk Gene " in their title (instead of Autism) without changing one iota of their real message - the putative usefulness of a technique. But that's " science " , ...these days. - Bill ...AS, retired geneticist -- WD " Bill " Loughman - Berkeley, California USA http://home.earthlink.net/~wdloughman/wdl.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2012 Report Share Posted March 22, 2012 Heh. You got my attention, - you *knew* you would! Newland wrote: > *Autism risk gene linked to differences in brain structure* > > http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-03/mali-arg032112.php That's the publisher's Press Release... > > The research they are referring to is available online @ > http://online.liebertpub.com/toc/brain/0/ja > > Scroll down to: ....announcing the actual article: > > *Altered Structural Brain Connectivity in Healthy rs of the Autism > Risk Gene, CNTNAP2* Description: free access > > Larson Dennis, Neda Jahanshad, D Rudie, A Brown, > Kori , McMahon, Greig de Zubicaray, Grant Montgomery, > , Margaret , Bookheimer, Mirella Dapretto, > Arthur Toga, > > Brain Connectivity. Feb 2012, ahead of print. ....which I read in its entirety. > > Abstract <http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/brain.2011.0064> > | Full Text PDF > <http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1089/brain.2011.0064> | [ snip ] The authors say very little about autism itself - essentially nothing. It's all more their demonstration that a very complicated investigative method could be useful in neurological research. However, IMO their choice of target gene - CNTNAP2 - is unfortunate. It *is* an " autism 'risk' gene " in the sense there is a statistical " association " with a population " having " autism. There are many, many such " risk " genes. But CNTNAP2 *also* has a strong association with " seizures " (acknowledged in the Introduction). So they *could* have put " Seizure Risk Gene " in their title (instead of Autism) without changing one iota of their real message - the putative usefulness of a technique. But that's " science " , ...these days. - Bill ...AS, retired geneticist -- WD " Bill " Loughman - Berkeley, California USA http://home.earthlink.net/~wdloughman/wdl.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2012 Report Share Posted March 22, 2012 Newland wrote: > Bill: > > I was hoping you would comment. Your field was research and it is always > good to see things through another lens as I am just a lay person. De nada; always glad to be helpful. Research was only a part of my career. My last years before retiring were *clinical* - almost entirely. ...Maybe useful for List subscribers to know. > > Many Thanks! > > > > Heh. You got my attention, - you *knew* you would! - Bill ...AS, retired ( clinical & research ) geneticist -- WD " Bill " Loughman - Berkeley, California USA http://home.earthlink.net/~wdloughman/wdl.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.