Guest guest Posted January 11, 2012 Report Share Posted January 11, 2012 One problem is that a lot of graphics could apply to ear pain -- physical pain from noise -- and not the kind of annoyance/rage engendered by 4S. So I think it is important that any graphic not be too general. There should be no room for a misophonia T-shirt (or coffee mug, which I like better) to be confused with a hyperacusis T-shirt. There is already enough confusion on that point, to the detriment to 4S sufferers. That's one reason I like the NYTimes graphic. The bubblegum in the ear indicates a specific type of sound -- a chewing sound - whereas a general covering of the ear more indicates a response to physical pain. I also like that graphic because it was connected to the story that legitimized 4S in the mainstream media and kicked off a lot of the current attention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2012 Report Share Posted January 14, 2012 Haha, yeah, I might as well wear a t-shirt that says " annoy me...please " . > > > A potential problem I see, might be that nobody will want to wear a tee shirt admitting that they have a problem with chewing noises or sniffling, it's really hard to admit to. > > But Peach, you make a great point about making it clear that the 4s-misophonia is not about physical pain or loud sounds, and not to be confused with hyperacusis! Thank you. : ) > > > > ________________________________ > > To: Soundsensitivity > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 8:13 PM > Subject: Any graphic should make clear that 4S is NOT hyperacusis > > > > One problem is that a lot of graphics could apply to ear pain -- physical pain from noise -- and not the kind of annoyance/rage engendered by 4S. > > So I think it is important that any graphic not be too general. There should be no room for a misophonia T-shirt (or coffee mug, which I like better) to be confused with a hyperacusis T-shirt. There is already enough confusion on that point, to the detriment to 4S sufferers. > > That's one reason I like the NYTimes graphic. The bubblegum in the ear indicates a specific type of sound -- a chewing sound - whereas a general covering of the ear more indicates a response to physical pain. > > I also like that graphic because it was connected to the story that legitimized 4S in the mainstream media and kicked off a lot of the current attention. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.